thaiboxerken
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2001
- Messages
- 34,618
I'm not sure and NDA can protect Bloomberg from sexual harrassment suits. It's my understanding that NDA's can't be used to keep criminal acts secret.
I'm not sure and NDA can protect Bloomberg from sexual harrassment suits. It's my understanding that NDA's can't be used to keep criminal acts secret.
I'm not sure and NDA can protect Bloomberg from sexual harrassment suits. It's my understanding that NDA's can't be used to keep criminal acts secret.
Round and round...
The point is the negative campaign against Sanders has not yet happened. It will.
Actually, the point is you assume that you know the ultimate effects of that negative campaigning. You don't.
I understand. It depends on the level of sexual misconduct.
Or the exposure of the sexual misconduct. Even if a woman claims that she was raped, and has good evidence of that, she has no duty to report that crime to police. In fact, it may be to her personal benefit to not report that rape to police if the rapist was someone of great wealth.
Yes I watched the debate. Yes I saw all the candidates exclaiming Bloomberg should release said people from their NDAs.
It was nothing but a gotcha.
While true, I don't think her reporting it would be a violation of any NDA, not an enforceable violation.
I’m finding your posts here in support of Bloomberg ... interesting.
It’s well-reported what the NDAs the women signed are all about. Vox has an explainer.. The guy is mysoginist...sexist, even.
So why the defense of Bloomberg? It seems...inconsistent.
This is indeed possible, but it assumes that he loses the nomination / general election.He could always wait until after the election season to reap vengeance. If Bloomberg loses the election, there's really no reason for him not to extract his pound of flesh from whoever injures him by violating the NDA.
This is indeed possible, but it assumes that he loses the nomination / general election.
I heard an interesting analysis this morning to the effect, nobody wants to attack sanders because they still can't believe he might get the nomination and they don't want to alienate his voters. Most of them figure that anyone currently willing to vote for any of the rest of the candidates will probably vote for the Dem in the general regardless but they think there's a good chance that Bernie's voters will stay home if the eventual candidate was perceived as too anti-Bernie.
Its interesting, I don't totally buy it but its interesting.
Don't get me wrong, you had an excellent point. The reason I was frustrated is it meant starting over looking for some evidence surrounding the lawsuits.When one accepts a settlement the terms of that settlement typically include the payment of a large sum of money and the signing of an NDA.
I have no evidence of such settlements, I am just trying to clarify that such NDAs are often much different from the NDA one may sign as they are hired into a company or onto a campaign. In fact, they are typically drafted from basic form language but tailored to that particular case or dispute.
#notallndas
There's enough out there to know he makes sexist comments. He's single has plays the field apparently. I don't think it's a big deal. Certainly he has nothing like Trump's disdain for women."How sexist?" is something left to be discovered.
I’m finding your posts here in support of Bloomberg ... interesting.
It’s well-reported what the NDAs the women signed are all about. Vox has an explainer.. The guy is mysoginist...sexist, even.
So why the defense of Bloomberg? It seems...inconsistent.
So there have been ~40 cases, over 20 years, against the company not against Bloomberg, most involving discrimination, not harassment, most settled out of court. Meaning the plaintiffs took a settlement.The majority of those cases concerned discrimination — on the basis of gender, race, disability status, or pregnancy.
You would be correct. It's the same when people put any illegal things in contracts. You can't do that.I'm not sure and NDA can protect Bloomberg from sexual harrassment suits. It's my understanding that NDA's can't be used to keep criminal acts secret.
Actually, the point is you assume that you know the ultimate effects of that negative campaigning. You don't.