Lets say you display your ignorance of math yet again - the circumstance of the Sun is the distance around it not the distance to it.
Lets say you make up a bunch of gibberish once again
!
Lets say you demonstrate your ignorance of relativity one more time
!
Let’s say observer ‘A’ and ‘B’ live in a high-rise flat. 'A' at 1st. floor and 'B' at 10th. They have identical clocks.
Observer A will say that observer B's clock is ticking
slower faster due to gravitational time dilation. Observer B will say that observer's A's clock is ticking
faster slower due to gravitational time dilation.
Let say they both measure the distance to the Moon by bouncing a laser off the Apollo reflectors (as is done every day). Light has a constant speed. They will measure the same time for the reflection.
They will calculate the same distance.
This is where relativity comes in,
Bjarne: If observer A calculates the time that observer B's clock will measure then A will get a different result from their clock.
This is the actual reality of the universe as experimentally confirmed and totally ignored by you.
In the example A and B are
observers.
They are both observing how fast
the Earth is orbiting the Sun.
They both can
observe that the distance must be the same, since there is a tape measure between the Sun and the Earth.
Both can
observe the measure tape. .
But A and B will not agree how fast the Earth is orbiting the sun, because clocks thick different.
Therefore the same Earth, where A and B lives, must from the perspective of A and B be moving with different speed.
The point is we know that
1.) Time at A and B's clock thick different
2.) We know that (comparable) speed therefore cannot be the same.
3.) We don't know whether also distances somehow are affected; simply because there are no experiments that can demonstrate this.
This mean we in fact really cannot be sure whether we
fullyhave understood relativity or not.
If you can imagine a version where
distances is stretching proportional with
time, - speed would be
comparable different
because these two factors are different.
This explains why speed is comparable different, but also why time must change when distances is changing.
But seen from their own perspective speed would be the same. This is the version I am sure is correct understanding of relativity.
Such version would not violet anything, - but rather
explain why and how speed of the Earth is observed, and seems to be (comparable) different for A and B.
Such version would be coherent and understandable.
In that case the Mercury Perihelion Precession Anomaly is not solved.
And because Einstein WANTED to solve that mystery he got that part of the theory wrong.
Relativistic resistance is the true cause of Perihelion Precession Anomalies.
!
