Daylightstar
Philosopher
Never mind.
Last edited:
Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.
- Thread starter Bjarne
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dark energy
- Status
Never mind.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Riiiight ..... which relative speed? And why speed and not motion?
Do you know the difference?
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Nothing to do with what I posted:
Originally Posted by Reality Check
Doubly wrong
- This is not the Lorentz equation.
- The Lorentz factor is a quantity that appears in SR. It is in its "basic root" an expression of the different velocities of observers.
The Lorentz factor is quite simple. When you take two inertial frames of references (e.g. 2 observers traveling with different velocities), it relates measurements between the frames such as lengths and durations.
Last edited:
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Since Newton it has been a mystery why it require pretty large energy to accelerate an object.
Since Einstein the mystery have been even stranger, now it requires more and more energy to reach diminishing speed increment.
Matter and space is somehow connected / woven into each other, - call in what you want.
RC use your head, it is so stupid to deny that, it is so stupid to deny that "we” have no idea why this is so.
It is in fact an open door to understand much more of the nature of space.
Cows have entered that door long ago.
Why have you not?
And why do you even not want to take even one step forward.
Resistance against motion is a fact.
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Bolding by DaylighstarOops, you forget to edit this. This is not what you really wanted to say.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
How ignorant: There is no mystery.
Newtonian mechanics describes exactly how energy is expended to accelerate objects (F=ma).
SR corrected this for large velocities.
Bjarne use your head, it is so stupid to deny that, it is so stupid to deny that "you” have no idea why this is so.
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
You do not have to confirm your ignorance, Bjarne!
853 days and the answer to Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units) is still no
!Experimental proof that Bjarne "kinetic resistance" is wrong
First asked 2 November 2009 Why particle accelerators disprove Bjarne's impossible "kinetic resistance" (the above post expanded).
Bjarne's idea is evidence wrong (acceleration due to gravity is constant inside a sphere).
First asked 2 November 2009
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Your statement means that you are still ignorant.
Inertia is not a mystery.
Its origin is unknown but there are plenty of theories about what causes it (e.g. Mach's principle)
Newtonian mechanics describes exactly how energy is expended to accelerate objects (F=ma).Its origin is unknown but there are plenty of theories about what causes it (e.g. Mach's principle)
SR corrected this for large velocities.
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
854 days and the answer to Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units) is still no
!He even confirmed this idiocy on 22nd February 2012 by arbitarily inserting the wrong
eek units into an equation!Experimental proof that Bjarne "kinetic resistance" is wrong
First posted 2 November 2009 Why particle accelerators disprove Bjarne's impossible "kinetic resistance" (the above post expanded).
Bjarne's idea is evidence wrong (acceleration due to gravity is constant inside a sphere).
First posted 2 November 2009
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Plenty of thesis, and all could be wrong
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
That is correct.
We know however that you have no thesis and (given how ignorant you have shown yourself to be) can never have a valid one.
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
ferd burfle
Graduate Poster
In an idle moment, I attempted to score this thread using modified (read lazy) rules:
-score each item only once; no multiples
-do the sums in your head
-if in doubt, don't count it
I got to 251.
ferd
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Oh, and Bjarne, plural of thesis is theses. You did not make a spelling mistake, you didn't actually know it.
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
The day you tell me why the resistance against motion only should apply to acceleration and not constant speed, - and mother cow could approve it, I could begin to trust you.
Lex I: Corpus omne perseverare in statu suo quiescendi vel movendi uniformiter in directum, nisi quatenus a viribus impressis cogitur statum illum mutare
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Cow jokes:
http://www.boyscouttrail.com/content/joke/joke-599.asp
Q: What is an unusually stupid cow called?
A: A MOOron.
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Relative to stupid humans, - it doesn’t exist
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Sorry Bjarne,the correct answer:
was already given. You're too late and too slow.
You do not win a prize. Thanks for playing, please visit again.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
The day that you learn that the definition of inertia is the resistance against changes in motion (acceleration), I could think that you have more brains than the mother cow you obsess with.
The fact is that there is no resistance against constant speed. It has never been measured (unless you are thinking about friction
!)857 days and the answer to Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units) is still no
!He even confirmed this idiocy on 22nd February 2012 by arbitarily inserting the wrong
eek units into an equation!The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked)
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
- Status