Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

[MRC_Hans]

If you can insulate electrons, yes it does not need to be hot, - how would you explain that is possible, - when cooling it will catch free electron.

Electrical field.

Don't you read the posts here? If you did, you would have noticed that I said that industrial plasma fields are normally cold. Now, I suppose you are so used to making stuff up that you think everybody does that, but you need to realize that when I say those plasma fields are cold, it is because I know they are.

But when moving with fast speed the process must cause temperature to rise, if not all gained energy is emitted, (which not is possible).

Wrong.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/1775/why-is-there-no-absolute-maximum-temperature

And apparently you also don't read the texts you are referring to? That article says that there is no maximum temperature. Which is, of course, quite logical, in view of GR.

However, if you had been reading the ensuing discussion, you would also have found that this is debatable.

Anyhow, you were saying that temperature is relative, and you were wrong.

Speaking of temperature, Bjarne: If you place something hot in a perfectly insulated container, what will happen to the temperature?

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

Anyhow, you were saying that temperature is relative, and you were wrong.

Hans

No you say temperature is relative not me .
Read my lips; I wrote "Heat itself is a relative term, as to one object being "hotter" than another, "

 

[MRC_Hans]

No you say temperature is relative not me .
Read my lips; I wrote "Heat itself is a relative term, as to one object being "hotter" than another, "

And what exactly is the difference between 'heat' and 'temperature'?

Speaking of temperature, Bjarne: If you place something hot in a perfectly insulated container, what will happen to the temperature?

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

And what exactly is the difference between 'heat' and 'temperature'?

Speaking of temperature, Bjarne: If you place something hot in a perfectly insulated container, what will happen to the temperature?

Hans

I guess the different between hot and not so hot is almost the same as between a big size cow and a cow not so big, right?
So a big cow is a relative term.
What will happen with the container when the container is too small or the cow too big?

 

[Daylightstar]

I guess the different between hot and not so hot ...

That was not the question.

...
What will happen with the container when the container is too small or the cow too big?

If the cow is too big for the container, then the cow can not be inside the container. Right next to it at the most.
Why would anything happen to the container with the big cow standing next to the container?
Maybe the cow would lick the container?

What kind of intellect would ponder the effects of putting such a cow in such a container?

 

[MRC_Hans]

I guess the different between hot and not so hot is almost the same as between a big size cow and a cow not so big, right?
So a big cow is a relative term.
What will happen with the container when the container is too small or the cow too big?

Which word did you not understand?:

Speaking of temperature, Bjarne: If you place something hot in a perfectly insulated container, what will happen to the temperature?

Just answer the question. Come on, Einstein, show us how smart you are. Is it the relative term 'hot' that bothers you? Fine, temperature is 300degC. OK?

Hans

 

[Bjarne]

Just answer the question. Come on, Einstein, show us how smart you are. the ?

Hans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRxYyQeKnNo

 

[Daylightstar]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRxYyQeKnNo

That bad eh?

 

[Zeuzzz]

Read my lips; I wrote "Heat itself is a relative term, as to one object being "hotter" than another, "

Its much more an absolute measure than relative.

 

[Bjarne]

Its much more an absolute measure than relative.

So how big is an absolute cow?
a.) on the Earth
b.) comparable in the weakest possible field of gravity where the cow still exists.
b.) comparable in the strongest field of gravity, where the cow still exists.

 

[Paul]

So how big is an absolute cow?

I'm beginning to suspect that Bjarne may actually be a surrealist performance artist.

 

[Daylightstar]

So how big is an absolute cow?
a.) on the Earth
b.) comparable in the weakest possible field of gravity where the cow still exists.
b.) comparable in the strongest field of gravity, where the cow still exists.

Why don't you go get a tape measure and find out, sunnyboy. Off you go ...

 

[Daylightstar]

I'm beginning to suspect that Bjarne may actually be a surrealist performance artist.

The performance is called "Dullness of mind, into the abyss of stupidity".

 

[Bjarne]

 

[Daylightstar]

So, you can make a screenshot, well done.
But that still doesn't answer the question.

However, with your lovely screenshot you probably want to convey that because the exact origin of Sedna's unusual orbit is not yet known, that your extremely poorly defined idea(s) explaine(s) this unusual orbit.

It's much like explaining an unknown with another unknown, like unfounded speculation.
It's similar to an appeal to quantum mechanics when attempting to rationalize magical thinking.

You do realize that you squarely belong in the magical thinking subset of the world's population, don't you?

 

[MRC_Hans]

Which word did you not understand?:

Speaking of temperature, Bjarne: If you place something hot in a perfectly insulated container, what will happen to the temperature?

Just answer the question. Come on, Einstein, show us how smart you are. Is it the relative term 'hot' that bothers you? Fine, temperature is 300degC. OK?

Hans

 

[Reality Check]

http://www.science27.com/images/sedna2.jpg

The usual ignorance resulting in a picture of a random astronomical object:
90377 Sedna

90377 Sedna is a trans-Neptunian object discovered in 2003, which as of 2011[update] was about three times as far from the Sun as Neptune. For most of its orbit it is even further from the Sun, with its aphelion estimated at 960 astronomical units (32 times Neptune's distance), making it one of the most distant known objects in the Solar System other than long-period comets.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/90377_Sedna#endnote_Bnone[f]
It is thought to be "nearly certainly" a dwarf planet,[11] though the IAU has not formally designated it as such. Though roughly two-thirds the size of Pluto, its distance from the Sun makes determining its shape, and thus demonstrating that it is in hydrostatic equilibrium, difficult. Spectroscopy has revealed that Sedna's surface composition is similar to that of some other trans-Neptunian objects, being largely a mixture of water, methane and nitrogen ices with tholins. Its surface is one of the reddest in the Solar System.
Sedna's exceptionally long and elongated orbit, taking approximately 11,400 years to complete, and distant point of closest approach to the Sun, at 76 AU, have led to much speculation as to its origin. The Minor Planet Center currently places Sedna in the scattered disc, a group of objects sent into highly elongated orbits by the gravitational influence of Neptune. However, this classification has been contested, as Sedna never comes close enough to Neptune to have been scattered by it, leading some astronomers to conclude that it is in fact the first known member of the inner Oort cloud. Others speculate that it might have been tugged into its current orbit by a passing star, perhaps one within the Sun's birth cluster, or even that it was captured from another star system. Another hypothesis suggests that its orbit may be evidence for a large planet beyond the orbit of Neptune. Astronomer Michael E. Brown, co-discoverer of Sedna and the dwarf planets Eris, Haumea, and Makemake, believes it to be the most scientifically important trans-Neptunian object found to date, as understanding its unusual orbit is likely to yield valuable information about the origin and early evolution of the Solar System.[12]

 

[Bjarne]

double

 

[Bjarne]

The usual ignorance resulting in a picture of a random astronomical object:
90377 Sedna

Others speculate that it might have been tugged into its current orbit by a passing star, perhaps one within the Sun's birth cluster, or even that it was captured from another star system. Another hypothesis suggests that its orbit may be evidence for a large planet beyond the orbit of Neptune. Astronomer Michael E. Brown, co-discoverer of Sedna and the dwarf planets Eris, Haumea, and Makemake, believes it to be the most scientifically important trans-Neptunian object found to date, as understanding its unusual orbit is likely to yield valuable information about the origin and early evolution of the Solar System.

Yeahhh mann
And I believe that there also exist some “scientists” that believe that Sedna must have been tugged by brown cows, dark elephants, dark matter, or a parallel Universe or maybe a herds of higgs, - escaping Cern, and this is why the higgs is cheating us “all” and not found, - The higgs has simply escape out in space and pulled Sedna in its wake.

Or maybe the incoherent speculation blab bla bla bla or bla bla bla bla or bla bla bla or maybe the incoherent speculation blab bla bla bla or bla bla bla bla or bla bla bla

Hmmmm
Could misunderstood relativist resistance be an answer ?