No, it will be the same. The effect of gravity is the same on ALL objects, because the lower force is balanced by a lower mass. (In a vaccum, a feather and a rock fall at the same speed).
We are
not speaking, and have never been spoken about mass depending influences.
But system depending influences.
Mother Cow pleasseeeeeessse heeeelpp me.
I will soon give up explaining Hans annnnyyyyyythiiiiing.
That seems to be gibberish. If the excentricity changes, the orbital period changes.
Bjarne
These are apogee anomalies fast building up and cancel out. If you give me the duration of the apogee precession period, I can easy calculate the influence. Notice time of 1 orbit is always the same (not affected) only the distance to the Satellites by apogee and perigee.
Hans
That seems to be gibberish. If the excentricity changes, the orbital period changes
Mother Cow pleasseeeeeessse heleeelpp me.
I will soon give up explaining Hans annnnyyyyyythiiiiing.
Hans there is 2 different influences, one is an influence of the eccentricity (not excentricity) , always when there is such 2 possibilities to chose from you can manage to mix it all together. .
I cannot do more for you.
I have before offered you free Cow logic lessons
I think we shall start from there, before taking advanced levels.
YES in the one case the orbital eccentricity (not excentricity) is changing, - this happen for the Moon (we don’t know why) and on a very much smaller scale it
must happens for satellites orbits too, - and not to forget for
ALL Moons.
Nobody cares what you believe. Such a difference would almost immidiately be noticed on GPS sattelites, and of course geostationart sattelites would drift.
No because in this case there is no
time lost of the orbit due to the
apogee precission anomaly, only insignificant signal delay or too fast signal.
The other anomaly is a
orbital eccentricity this will be less as 5 mm per year.
This anomaly will cansel it self out fast and appear agian.
It is billion parts we are talking about. It is extremely difficult to discover.
We already have
good reason to believe satellites
too will be affected with such magnitude.
You can't measure it with a gravimeter, since it will move at the same speed.
Rubbish, if the Speed of the Earth would be fast enough you must be able to measure it with a gravimeter.
It has nothing with a different observer to do; - if this was the case a person living at Jupiter and Mercury would not agree about the mass of the Earth.
In his original dream, matter continuously sucked in space, causing a 'space wind' that was pulling stuff together
Liar I NEVER claimed that,
but
only that matter
in motion would drag space, - and that would cause a space wind. - This is a completely different story.
The
basic claim is that gravity, dark matter and dark energy is a trinity, - the glue / common denominator is to understand the nature of gravity, - which mean that gravity = absorbed space.
All space does is only to stretch or release its own "density".
Dark Energy is release of space.
Gravity the opposite
Dark Matter = the same influence on space as visible matter - but dark matter = matter that exploded 13,7 billion years ago, still the effect from that matter is here, - that effect is releases as so called dark energy, the opposite...
This is the basic theory.
A second parts of the theory is a consequences of; what just have been mentioned; - it is for example about: now when we know how matter and space is connected, we can remove our blindfolds and begin to understand why there is RR (relative resistance), - why and how speed is causing mass increase, and at the same time resistance against motion - simply because, - relativistic mass increase only can be a result of larger space absorption. And this Cow logic simply mean RR
We are now in daylight, and the road is strait, - just follow that, it is all from here so obviously.
And don’t stop , before this theory proves itself.
It is inevitable…
The evidence are already everywhere around us, and more will follow.
The good thing is this theory can point out exactly where to look, - look in exactly the predicted directions and you’ll certainly see more and more evidence popping up everywhere.
For example all the moons are
not following orbits we can predict based on the prevailing knowledge. And whys should they ? - space probes does also not follow orbits we can predict , stars not either, and off course also not the planet.
Someone want a bet 1 million USD that the orbit our Moon not follows an orbit we can predict based on known common knowledge?
!
