Since we have not yet been searching long enough with the right type of detector systems we have a very limited view of the planets around other stars. The main limit is that we are seriously biased towards finding large planets in close orbits
Small earths like planets are difficult to detect, not giant planets.
It is the
pattern that include the
giant planets that is my point.
WASP-18b is a fairly rare case. It's a very large planet that's being slowly torn apart by its parent star.
It is only rare that Wasp-18b is so close a star, - and still alive.
It is normal that very young stars have giant planets in orbit as well as these relative fast falls to their mother stars.
Bjarne
Right we know there is a “friction” due to the tidal wave, - and hence a slower rotation influence due to that.
Wollery
I have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean. It makes no sense in English.
It means that the ocean of the earth is dragged towards the moon, (not much) and at the same time the Earth rotate.
This friction (between the ocean bottom and the ocean) is one of the reason to the Earth’s rotation slows down. - This is common knowledge.
Ummm, well no, not really. A planet falling into a star will speed up the star a little bit, but not "much faster". Equally, tidal forces push planets slowly away from their stars, but "throw a planet away"? Not hardly.
I am
sure we will have to rethink all this> KE transfer again.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13411-earths-rotation-may-account-for-wayward-spacecraft.html
No, it isn't, not in the absence of any frictional force.
According to the prevailing understanding the answer is no.
BUT there are no reasons to claim that resistance against motion only applies to acceleration. This is one of the silliest ideas ever invented.
NOTHING in reality supports this, only old orthodox creeds.
And it is exactly here the chain went off for long ago, - and here the reason to many unnecessary mysteries are to be found.
It requires more and more energy to get a diminishing increase in speed; it is completely silly to believe that the resistance to increase speed suddenly should disappear by constant speed.
I am sure we have much more to learn.
Basic is to understand WHY space resist motion. So far we have not even come close
Also why “M” is increasing due to increasing speed is completely unknown.
And finally we also MUST understand WHY this “process” suddenly "should" stop when constant speed have been reach, - again we have no idea why this strange resistance "inertia" only should apply for acceleration, simple because we don’t understand anything of this in the first place.
The fact is; also by constant speed of an object, - it still require energy to maintain the motion / to overcome resistance agianst motion (intertia).
It make no sense to discuss this further, we have been through it all.
You can
believe in the prevailing completely blind science, OR you can try to
understand WHAT happens really with the cocktail:
Mass / Speed / Space / KE
My opinion is simple;
- The nature of elementary particles is to “twist space around them” This is what consumes space.
- And hence this is what is stretching space near matter.
- And hence this is what gravity really is.
- And hence this is what “bended space" really means.
- Now, - when elementary particles moves in space, these are twisted deeper into space, the result is more contracted space = more mass,
- and hence gradually more resistance due to gradually speed increase,
- and therefore gradually more energy requirement to overcome the gradually increasing resistance.
It is all so cow -logic simple, when you really begin to understand the basic of the nature of gravity, and not just by heard have learn some empty expression and can calculate how much a cow and light bends
- Matter = Contracted Space
- Due to that space around matter = is Stretching ( because of matter “consumed” space).
But this part is not possible
directly to prove, to heavy concrete brains.
So either you prefer the prevailing blind “half wind”, or you have the possibility to understand the basic nature of gravity, -
it is yours choose.
Take it or leave it.
Complete and utter cobblers. Let's start with "billion of stars and planet". We know of fewer than 200 planets, and there are only a few million properly catalogued stars.
This is more than enough to understand the
pattern I have described.
All it requires is only to open your eyes.
Furthermore: Solar system must be created in a similar way.
Understand the law and that's it.
Off course there can be difference in mass / density etc...
but still it is easy to conclude that right after a solar system are created, - there are several giant planets in orbit, - few billion year after, these giant are gone....
These will fall of 2 reason
- The tidal wave
- Resistance against motion.
In the end of the day it is the Sun’s rotation that pays the bill for
all the resistance against motion in the solar system, - both the Sun’s own rotation, as well as the planet orbits.
This mean when one or several giant planet is orbit a Star it will “pull” a lot KE from the stars rotation, to be able to maintenance its speed.
The resistance of planet motion is Mv^2/2, so you can easy conclude that the huge Mass of a planet drags much KE from the stars rotation, whereby the stars rotation fast decreases, and a domino effect takes place, because then the star can transfer less “rotation KE back to the planet orbit ( resistance against motion speed) etc…etc…etc… and the giant planet is doomed.
When there are several giant planets in a solar system, the star will speed up and slow down until all are gone.
This takes longer time , and this is the reason to that it is a mystery that for example Wasp-18b still is alive.
Remember it is the combination between
resistance against motion + the tidal wave that pulls a giant planet down.
But this also speed up the rotation of the star and extend the time other planets have left, because when a giant planet fall, the increase of the stars rotation will throw other planets further out in the solar system...-
The resistance to motion that the planets get from the Sun is tiny. I mean really, really, really small. The Sun will expand to a red giant many billions of years before Mercury would have any chance of falling into the Sun on its own.
The day you fully understand
that resistance against motion also apply by constant speed, you are force to understand that the KE transfer to a planet due to the Suns rotation is
VERY much underestimated.
We have to rethink all this again, - time has come.
Space probes will guide those that have open eyes and open minds.
There is unfortunately no hope for those that have spent years in the education system. Because they are trained to believe that priest, popes, bishop and especially professors are perfect and omniscient, and that anybody else must be considered in collusion with the devil or just completely nuts crackpots. Amen.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13411-earths-rotation-may-account-for-wayward-spacecraft.html
!