• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Bitcoin - Part 3

It's quicker than saying that there are errors in your post.

If you want to talk about steep increases/decreases then go back to 2017 or 2013.

Ah, so here's the error in yours: that there are steeper increases doesn't make this one not steep.

And, FYI, having a differing point of view doesn't make other peoples' wrong.
 
Ah, so here's the error in yours: that there are steeper increases doesn't make this one not steep.

And, FYI, having a differing point of view doesn't make other peoples' wrong.
Come off it. This is just a run of the mill price change for bitcoin and you know it. Why you would want to cherry pick one price change and disguise it as newsworthy is beyond me.
 
Come off it.

Come off what? Pointing out that, once again, your favourite thing in the world is having hiccups?

This is just a run of the mill price change for bitcoin and you know it.

That is not mutually exclusive with my comment.

Why you would want to cherry pick one price change and disguise it as newsworthy is beyond me.

It'd be beyond me too, were that what I did. Fortunately I didn't. Perhaps you should refrain from adding your own interpretation on top of my clear, concise posts.
 

Try this: Bitcoin often has steep climbs and declines.

See how that works? You can't even logic this topic properly. Mind you, if you didn't find yourself obligated to respond to every criticism or comment about BTC you wouldn't put yourself in such ridiculous predicaments. You say you only respond to erroneous claims about BTC, but your history shows otherwise.
 
It's quicker than saying that there are errors in your post.

A different point of view is not the same as an error. He portrays frequent steep changes in value as a negative. You dismiss it as "normal for Bitcoin".

If you want to talk about steep increases/decreases then go back to 2017 or 2013.

You also keep putting out this idea that if something were discussed before that we shouldn't raise the issue again. This is BS. The volativity of Bitcoin has been an ongoing issue, and it's just a viable a topic today as it was in years past.
 
You also keep putting out this idea that if something were discussed before that we shouldn't raise the issue again.
Anybody would think that bitcoin's volatility is something that is seldom discussed. That is not the case with bitcoin where price changes are constantly being posted by everybody with an anti-bitcoin agenda.

At some point it stops being news and falls under the "water is wet" category.
 
Anybody would think that bitcoin's volatility is something that is seldom discussed. That is not the case with bitcoin where price changes are constantly being posted by everybody with an anti-bitcoin agenda.

At some point it stops being news and falls under the "water is wet" category.

Not everybody reading this has followed the discussion from the beginning. For some of them being told "water is wet" is informative. Even so, it's not your place to police what someone else considers to be a contribution.
 
Bitcoins are quantum, you can't observe them without affecting their value.
 
Not everybody reading this has followed the discussion from the beginning. For some of them being told "water is wet" is informative. Even so, it's not your place to police what someone else considers to be a contribution.
And yet you find it necessary to police my posts. :rolleyes:

BTW It is still only a month since I OFFERED for you to do an imaginary short of bitcoin. It might only have been a mental bet but you would be losing your mind right now. Do you find that informative or should I wait 6 or 12 months before reminding you that you wanted to short bitcoin?
 

Back
Top Bottom