Everyone realizes that, yes.
So what? Do you have any evidence that at some time in the future the price will collapse permanently?
The claim was that a permanent price collapse is "inevitable". The use of this word instead of "possible" places the burden of proof on the claimant.Do you have any evidence that it won't? I don't think you understand who really owns the burden of proof when it comes to speculative financial instruments.
The claim was that a permanent price collapse is "inevitable". The use of this word instead of "possible" places the burden of proof on the claimant.
The only person I see in this thread referencing a "permanent price collapse" is you.
Do you have any evidence that it won't?So what? Do you have any evidence that at some time in the future the price will collapse permanently?
Your memory can not possibly be that short:
Hodlers can now panic.
The monthly distribution top is complete with a most elegant neckline.
Target 11k
(initially)
Hodlers can now panic.
The monthly distribution top is complete with a most elegant neckline.
Target 11k
(initially)
HODL
HODL is a term derived from a misspelling of "hold," in the context of buying
and holding Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. It's also commonly come to
stand for "hold on for dear life" among crypto investors.
Neckline
The neckline is a level of support or resistance found on a head and shoulders
pattern that is used by traders to determine strategic areas to place orders.
A neckline connects the swing lows (which occur following the first two peaks)
of the head and shoulders topping pattern. A move below the neckline signals
a breakout of the pattern and indicates that a reversal to the downside of the
prior uptrend is underway.
Welcome to the wonderful world of speculating by looking at charts
of randomness all day long and seeing patterns where there are none.
It's basically the astrology of cryptoland.
On Sunday, an attacker managed to drain around $182 million of cryptocurrency from Beanstalk Farms, a decentralized finance (DeFi) project aimed at balancing the supply and demand of different cryptocurrency assets. Notably, the attack exploited Beanstalk’s majority vote governance system, a core feature of many DeFi protocols.
According to analysis from blockchain security firm CertiK, the Beanstalk attacker used a flash loan obtained through the decentralized protocol Aave to borrow close to $1 billion in cryptocurrency assets and exchanged these for enough beans to gain a 67 percent voting stake in the project. With this supermajority stake, they were able to approve the execution of code that transferred the assets to their own wallet. The attacker then instantly repaid the flash loan, netting an $80 million profit.
Based on the duration of an Aave flash loan, the entire process took place in less than 13 seconds.
The future is now!
13 seconds, don't think you can make a good heist movie out of this nerd stuff:
Decentralized finance, unless someone has enough money to do a majority takeover, then they can just vote as a bloc to clean out the assets. Whoops!
https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/18/23030754/beanstalk-cryptocurrency-hack-182-million-dao-voting
This isn't a hack though in the sense of a computer hack, this is a legal hostile take over. The article does not seem to understand the difference, nothing was actually stolen here.
I also want to know what the supposed benefit, other than this kind of corporate raiding, of borrowing a billion dollars for under a minute.