• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Birthers 'R' Back

Still incorrect on the ownership of Mombasa during that time, but at least they are getting better at forging.
 
If that is a standard 8.5x11 piece of paper, then Obama had a huge foot for a newborn.:confused:
 
Ohnoes said:
If that is a standard 8.5x11 piece of paper, then Obama had a huge foot for a newborn.:confused:
Click to expand...



Well, you know what they say, "Big feet, ......























.....wait for it........
















....big shoes."
 
I thought you were totally going to say....


























"Large socks!"
 
Wow, that is a truly scary blog. Hitler talked to children, Barack Obama wants to talk to children, therefor Obama is just like Hitler. Oh my GOD!!1!

Barack smokes, the Marlboro Man smokes, is it possible that Barrack Obama is the Marlboro Man?
 
Ohnoes said:
If that is a standard 8.5x11 piece of paper, then Obama had a huge foot for a newborn.:confused:
Click to expand...


Not really. I measured on my monitor and scaled, and the print is a little over 3" long. That's right in the middle of the range for Size 0 - birth to 6 weeks. (See here.)

The dates are much more problematic, IMO.
 
SpitfireIX said:
Not really. I measured on my monitor and scaled, and the print is a little over 3" long. That's right in the middle of the range for Size 0 - birth to 6 weeks. (See here.)
Click to expand...



Well then, anything you might derive from this about the size of the President's .... shoes..... should probably be disregarded as erogenous erroneous. I meant to say erroneous!
 
So it has a space for the residence of the mother, but not the father? Also, it doesn't list the father's birthdate.
 
Heh - and the names of the doctors include O WANG and O DONG... and yet neither signature appears to have the letter G in it.
 
fullflavormenthol said:
Still incorrect on the ownership of Mombasa during that time, but at least they are getting better at forging.
Click to expand...
Well I would disagree, and say that in fact it really is a far more lazy forged birth certificate when compared against the one that was based off the Australian certificate.


(I changed my opinion, and felt arguing with myself is the most productive means to express this.)
 
Last edited:
Oh it has a baby footprint, so it HAS to be real.

Interesting that the date of birth of the father Barack H. Obama has only the year, reflecting the fact that most public information about him lacks precisely this information (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama,_Sr.). It is hardly plausible that neither Obama Sr. nor his wife knew what day his own birthday fell.
 
Isn't Kenya metric?
Weren't they already in 1961? I can't dinf that info, maybe someone else?
And really, do birthers want Joe Biden as president?
 
Mangoose said:
It is hardly plausible that neither Obama Sr. nor his wife knew what day his own birthday fell.
Click to expand...

I don't find it implausible, given that Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in the 30s. African birth records from that era can be spotty (as they still are in some regions), and I have no idea whether knowing the day of your birth is a big deal in Kenya or not.

As for early 1960s Kenya and the metric system... it was a British colony, so my guess is they'd use imperial (the UK didn't phase out the imperial system until 1995, and even then they didn't go completely metric -- a British pint is still a pint, not .5 liters), but I'm not sure. This could be one of those things birthers get right accidentally.
 
Last edited:
So...he's plotted for years to hide his lack of real citizenship, run for office and obtain the presidency but didn't have some "agent" go to Kenya and scrub the files?
 
headscratcher4 said:
So...he's plotted for years to hide his lack of real citizenship, run for office and obtain the presidency but didn't have some "agent" go to Kenya and scrub the files?
Click to expand...

It couldn't be done, because there's a footprint of The Chosen One on the birth certificate, and destroying that is like throwing darts at a picture of Stalin in the Red Square circa 1951.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom