Bill Clinton made $75 million from speeches

ANTPogo said:
Hopefully, a discussion of the BET interview. You keep ignoring my questions about that, BaC.
Click to expand...

Howdy ANTPogo

You might want to repost that question or a link to it. Lets review what our inept 'researcher' is hiding from.
 
I haven’t been keeping up with the news but I assume Clinton has been arrested and is awaiting trial for his myriad crimes? No doubt also his money as been stripped away, and whatever lawyer would lower himself to representing Histories Greatest Monster™ is cowering in fear at the IRONCLAD proof that BaC has, I am sure, presented in this very thread?

The alternative of course is that BaC has spent countless hours combing the crack-pot end of the internet to piece together a convoluted justification for his deranged paranoid fantasies. And there's no way that's true, there are people who spend their lives in tiny bare rooms who still have better things to do then that.
 
LukeB said:
I haven’t been keeping up with the news but I assume Clinton has been arrested and is awaiting trial for his myriad crimes? No doubt also his money as been stripped away, and whatever lawyer would lower himself to representing Histories Greatest Monster™ is cowering in fear at the IRONCLAD proof that BaC has, I am sure, presented in this very thread?

The alternative of course is that BaC has spent countless hours combing the crack-pot end of the internet to piece together a convoluted justification for his deranged paranoid fantasies. And there's no way that's true, there are people who spend their lives in tiny bare rooms who still have better things to do then that.
Click to expand...

I should point out that Clinton hasn't denied that he started the Second Gulf War by sleeping with Saddam Hussein's first wife....what villainy!!!
 
Yeah, he was arrested by an elite squad of "internet ninjas" and will be tried by a jury of his peers (overpaid leftist sex offenders) on youtube.

You'll need to subscribe to his twitter feed to find out when the trial will be.
 
BeAChooser said:
I never said there was anything wrong with Clinton making money. It's the American way. As far as he goes.

What I said, clearly and now almost a half dozen times (do you folks have trouble reading?), is that the people idolizing and giving huge sums of money to him ... a man who broke just about every oath he could break (from marriage vows to the oath to tell the truth during depositions to his oath of office as President) and who by all appearances was involved in criminal act after criminal act (some QUITE serious) ... is disgusting, IMO. It says volumes about those people.

Are you clear now? Ears unplugged?
Click to expand...

But considering that there isn't any actual evidence that he's committed any capital offenses, just speculation by people who seem to have an awful lot of political bias. It's honestly more telling that you have a problem with people wanting to actually hear what the man might have to say than the people who are willing to pay for it.

Remember, allegations of wrongdoings are worthless without real evidence - and the "evidence" that has been provided appears to be constantly rejected by experts and the justice system. Assuming it's all a coverup to protect one man is, frankly, insane. This a country that loves to watch the downfall of famous people.

And no, my ears are quite plugged from this damn cold.
 
elbe said:
But considering that there isn't any actual evidence that he's committed any capital offenses
Click to expand...

So anything but a capital offense by Clinton himself doesn't count? :rolleyes:

elbe said:
, just speculation by people who seem to have an awful lot of political bias.
Click to expand...

And what political bias can you prove that CPO Janoski had? She was a democrat who voted for Clinton in the previous election. So was Cyril Wecht. In fact, can you show that ANY of the named pathologists in the Ron Brown case harbored a political bias? Or are you just *speculating* about that?

How about Miquel Rodriguez? Can you offer anything to prove he had a political bias? Or are you again just *speculating*?

Likewise, what about the man who headed the impeachment effort in the House, David Schippers? He was a democrat. Who TWICE voted for Clinton. Yet, he stated that had the statutes of limitation not expired, he'd have tried Clinton for rape. He stated that certain republicans in Congress sold out and Clinton should have been charged with crimes extending all the way to treason. Where was his political bias, elbe?

And how about Jerome M. Zeifman? He also was a democrat (in fact, the chief counsel of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of the Nixon impeachment). He said this in 1998:

I believe my fellow Democrats on today's Judiciary Committee have a moral, ethical and constitutional responsibility to vote to impeach President Clinton. The positions taken by the president and his die-hard Democratic defenders in Congress and the media are indefensible.
Click to expand...

In 1999 he added this

In my opinion, the misconduct of President Clinton and his White House is more egregious by far than the misconduct of the Nixon White House with respect to the misuse of the IRS. We found that in fact there was some misuse of the IRS [by Nixon], but it was not part of an overall systematic plan, as has been the case with the Clinton White House.
Click to expand...

And later added this:

In his conduct of the office of the president of the United States, William J. Clinton has given or received bribes
Click to expand...

Are you claiming that Zeifman was political biased, too? Seriously?

:rolleyes:
 
BeAChooser said:
So anything but a capital offense by Clinton himself doesn't count? :rolleyes:



And what political bias can you prove that CPO Janoski had? She was a democrat who voted for Clinton in the previous election. So was Cyril Wecht. In fact, can you show that ANY of the named pathologists in the Ron Brown case harbored a political bias? Or are you just *speculating* about that?

How about Miquel Rodriguez? Can you offer anything to prove he had a political bias? Or are you again just *speculating*?

Likewise, what about the man who headed the impeachment effort in the House, David Schippers? He was a democrat. Who TWICE voted for Clinton. Yet, he stated that had the statutes of limitation not expired, he'd have tried Clinton for rape. He stated that certain republicans in Congress sold out and Clinton should have been charged with crimes extending all the way to treason. Where was his political bias, elbe?

And how about Jerome M. Zeifman? He also was a democrat (in fact, the chief counsel of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of the Nixon impeachment). He said this in 1998:



In 1999 he added this



And later added this:



Are you claiming that Zeifman was political biased, too? Seriously?

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


PSSSSTTT! He was talking about you!:D

What's next?
 
BeAChooser said:
So anything but a capital offense by Clinton himself doesn't count? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, that was just a misspeak on my part - I've been living in a bit of a fog from this cold.

Read it as "there isn't any actual evidence that he's committed any capital offenses". It's all just speculation or people saying "it looks like". Yes, I'm sure you're more than willing to show me the "evidence", but I don't particularly want go down that road to nowhere, and considering how no one else, at least of any importance, seems to actually agree with you I'm taking your evidence as not particularly persuasive.
 
elbe said:
Read it as "there isn't any actual evidence that he's committed any capital offenses".
Click to expand...

Again, are capital offenses committed by him the only crimes that matter? What about capital offenses committed by someone else but covered up by him and his administration? Do those not count either? Does treason not count? Bribery? Any other crimes you'd like to name that actually do count?

elbe said:
It's all just speculation or people saying "it looks like". Yes, I'm sure you're more than willing to show me the "evidence", but I don't particularly want go down that road to nowhere
Click to expand...

http://www.ostrichheadinsand.com/images/ostrich_head_in_sand.jpg

elbe said:
, and considering how no one else, at least of any importance, seems to actually agree with you I'm taking your evidence as not particularly persuasive.
Click to expand...

LOL! So you don't consider David Schippers as having been important? Or Miquel Rodriguez? Or the pathologists at Dover? Or Ziefman? But you seem to think JREFers are? LOL!
 
BeAChooser said:
Again, are capital offenses committed by him the only crimes that matter?
Click to expand...

Gah! I did it again! I copied my original sentence intending to modify it (essentially remove the capital part) and completely forgot to - I think I had to add a "t" that I missed in copying.

I think I need a good lie down.
 
I done hear tell the Clinton may have jay walked at some point in his life...there forth we should undue the entire 8 years he was in office...don't cha know.
 
Where has BAC gone? Has he abandoned yet another thread when what he said was evidence, was AGAIN, shown to be wrong.......but now he doesn't even seem to want to continue the challenges he made........which was exactly what was predicted he would do.....
 
We have gone through the purpose and authenticity of the LOR. I am ready for whatever is next BaC.

Shall we move to Brown and discuss the BET interview? You know the one no one can seem to find.
 
ANTPogo and Biscuit has our the gallant challenger fled the field?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom