• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot - serious, not follies

Diamond said:
Only five days, apparently.

Does anyone think Beckjord a) will mend his ways and b) is a good recommendation for the JREF?
Click to expand...


Answer;

a) No.
b) The attitude and response he gets at JREF can be a good recommendation for the forum as a whole. If people can keep their heads about them and continue the discussion despite the noise level.
 
erikbeckjord said:
Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at
Gettysburgh civil war field.)

I don;t put lies on websites.

Besides, Nicole got her revenge...

OJ has lost his hair.

:p

WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET.


* Here I am. I have written and denied the idea that you or anybody else is a bigfoot expert as that would require knowledge of its anatomy, physiology, ecology, origins, ancestry, diet, classification, examination of both live and dead specimens, intense and sustained observation. etc. I doubt that you are evn an expert in the required fields to ever become a bigfoot expert even shoiuld there be found thousands of them. Are you an expert in ichthology. trichology, scatology, genetics, zoology, systematics, cladistics, phytobiogeography?Your claims are meaningless babble and it is the rest of us on this board who should be searching elsewhere for intelligent debate for you are not the one to give any.*



Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate.
Click to expand...
 
Gorillagator said:
Click to expand...

Was there a point to quoting an entire post from earlier in the same thread, while adding absolutely nothing new?

Edited to add: Hmm, out of five total posts to date, this is at least the second time Gorillagator has done this, while a third post (all three in this thread) merely added a non-sensical reply to someone else's post. Sock puppet?
 
Beady said:
Was there a point to quoting an entire post from earlier in the same thread, while adding absolutely nothing new?
Click to expand...

Nothing new? Did you note it was all bolded and stop without reading it?

I had trouble with the quote feature at first too. It's takes some getting used to, even with experience on this kind of board. Leave out one [/B] and that's all she wrote.


Edited to add: Hmm, out of five total posts to date, this is at least the second time Gorillagator has done this, while a third post (all three in this thread) merely added a non-sensical reply to someone else's post. Sock puppet?
Click to expand...

What a lovely welcome to a new member! I think you'll find E.L. isn't what you're used to in the way of fresh meat. The guy knows his stuff.
 
LAL said:
I had trouble with the quote feature at first too. It's takes some getting used to, even with experience on this kind of board. Leave out one /B and that's all she wrote.
Click to expand...


That's what the "Preview Reply" and "Edit" buttons are for.

What a lovely welcome to a new member! I think you'll find E.L. isn't what you're used to in the way of fresh meat. The guy knows his stuff.
Click to expand...

Except how to use the quote feature.

And I'm not looking for "fresh meat." If you, yourself, had more experience, you'd realize that. I just expect a certain level of competence in someone who has made it this far.
 
Beady said:

And I'm not looking for "fresh meat." If you, yourself, had more experience, you'd realize that. I just expect a certain level of competence in someone who has made it this far.
Click to expand...

I myself and E.L. have plenty of experience, just not on this board. He tends to have his own quoting style elsewhere, too, which is quite readable, if a little unconventional.

I don't know how many boards you've posted on, but coming onto a new one is always like walking into a pack of hyenas. One or more of the regulars can't wait to tear a "newbie" to shreds. On a couple of occasions other posters have come to my defense; that's always appreciated if no longer necessary.

Reminds me of school, somehow.

Do you have some position here that gives you the right to expect a "certain level of competence in someone who has made it this far"?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post

Gorillagator said:
And good enough for Son Of Sam...
Click to expand...

And Andrea Yates............
 
LAL said:
Do you have some position here that gives you the right to expect a "certain level of competence in someone who has made it this far"?
Click to expand...

No, and that's my point. Some things, you can reasonably expect that everyone in a given venue knows how to do. If you're on the freeway, the average person has a perfect right to expect that everyone he encounters knows how to drive.

BTW, as long as we're talking about "rights," please show me your authorization to speak in this EL's name? If he's as competent as you say, let him speak for himself.
 
Beady said:
No, and that's my point. Some things, you can reasonably expect that everyone in a given venue knows how to do. If you're on the freeway, the average person has a perfect right to expect that everyone he encounters knows how to drive.

BTW, as long as we're talking about "rights," please show me your authorization to speak in this EL's name? If he's as competent as you say, let him speak for himself.
Click to expand...

He already has. Did you miss it?
 
Beady said:
Was there a point to quoting an entire post from earlier in the same thread, while adding absolutely nothing new?

Edited to add: Hmm, out of five total posts to date, this is at least the second time Gorillagator has done this, while a third post (all three in this thread) merely added a non-sensical reply to someone else's post. Sock puppet?
Click to expand...


* Writing about nonsensical replies, this last of yours beats all. There sure was a point to repeating my post; The lack of a response which I still have yet to read. when one doesn't recieve a proper answer to a set of questions and evades them like the plague then it only seems proper to corner the person by repeating the same questions again and again until some kind of honest answer appears. But I see that this isn't going to happen here. Instead a sorry critique of my post is the answer which means that you have no proper reply and thus evade the issue by whining about the content of my posts. BTW when will you add something to the forum? Sick puppet?*
 
erikbeckjord said:
I am here to save you from the error(s) of your ways.

;)
Click to expand...


* Well starting from a poor premise such as yours above will lead you to errors as you have surely demonstrated.*
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Erik

erikbeckjord said:
Reply:we have no evidence acceptable to science. OK? But we have a 23 ft 16mm film, FWIW. Also blood and hair and a claim of DNA.

But this is not enuff. OK? And it is impossible to prove a supernatural thing. But we are trying. Now stop your stupid giggling. Get your a** out there and do some research,.

You want an attempt at proof? http://www.biggfoot.org

Now our best proof of superantural is

Hundreds of trax in snow that are unfakable due to stride, (59 in) and depth, and size, that simply start from nothing and end in one last step.


* Allegedly. Tracks that start from nowhere and lead to nowhere are most likely in your head only.*


On video yet.
Brian Smith.


I also found this four times in snow, mud, grass over mud and more snow. It does happen.


* No it doesn't. Not in reality it doesn't.*



This means:

BF either goes up in a helicopter (none ever seen nor heard) or it is supernatural.



* You forgot a third possibilty; that you are fibbing. Or another possiblity is that you are hallucinating. A fifth possibility is that you misssed the start and end of the alleged tracks.*


Now quityour childiish sniggering, and get real, and assist us. Ditto you other kiddies.

:o
Click to expand...
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Erik

Gorillagator said:
Click to expand...


RE MISSED END OF TRACKS.

COMMENT: NO, WE DID NOT.

Obviously, you think we are novices.

Not the case.

Fibbing? Have no time to waste on that. Stop insulting us.

Besides, it is now on video, and de camera, she do not lie, senor.

Brian Smith video. Tracks in snow.

El Erik

:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom