bigfoot is real I have the proof

[Drewbot]

A few points being missed here.

1. They are NOT going undetected. Creekfreak detects them regularly.
2. Theoretically, if roads are in 1 mile squares, then if Bigfoot walked from one corner to the opposite corner in a straight line, he could travel up to 1.4 Miles in a straight line without crossing a road.
3. Harpoons are used to take big animals, but usually those animals are Cetaceans.
4. Could the Harpoon be an unwitting Metaphor for Creek's Captain Ahab personna?

 

[drapier]

I'd like to pitch an idea for a movie to one of the Hollywood studios. It would be a remake of Jaws, but instead of being about a shark attacking beach-goers it would be about a renegade bigfoot menacing unsuspecting pantries with a screwdriver.

The first main character would be a renegade bigfoot researcher who uses unorthodox methods like blackmail and selling doctored photos on the internet to fund his crusade to convince a skeptical world that its baked beans are not safe while the hairy man is on the loose.

The other main character is a renegade skipper of a Boston Whaler who had a run-in with bigfoot some twenty years earlier in the swampy wilds of Northern Florida. The skipper brandishes a harpoon gun and vows to use it against his nemesis as revenge for the broken tail bone he suffered in the earlier encounter with the giant.

Do you think I have a shot?

 

[Creekfreak]

May we pray !

 

[Locknar]

A few points being missed here.

1. They are NOT going undetected. Creekfreak detects them regularly.
2. Theoretically, if roads are in 1 mile squares, then if Bigfoot walked from one corner to the opposite corner in a straight line, he could travel up to 1.4 Miles in a straight line without crossing a road.
3. Harpoons are used to take big animals, but usually those animals are Cetaceans.
4. Could the Harpoon be an unwitting Metaphor for Creek's Captain Ahab personna?

Why do I suddenly picture Creekfreak as the Sea Captain from "The Simpson's"?

To think...all that regular sighting, and no credible evidence. And after years of regular sightings at that; perhaps he should discover a new hobby?

 

[YouBelieveWHAT?]

The Bigfoot has developed, as a defense, the ability to emit a scent similar to a flowery shampoo. Once the dog detects the scent, he runs in the opposite direction.

I believe this must be the case because both of my dogs run from baths or anything that smells like it may possibly mean a bath. This would make sense, since dogs are attracted to foul smelling things, like garbage, skunks and goose poop.

*insert eyeroll *

Of course - as detailed in another thread - Bigfoot can apparently become invisible, and shift to other dimensions, so even if dogs start tracking, they'll very soon lose the scent

I do agree with you about dogs, Linda - when my dog was alive she behaved exactly as you mention.

Oh - and welcome......

 

[grayman]

Someone else claims to have seen Bigfoot:

 

[Maldon]

I wonder if this is real footage from when the boys from BFF went to visit creekfreak?
Well, it's as good as any BF-film I've ever seen.

 

[William Parcher]

Your link dident work raven but its a standerd 13 1/2 boston whaler I think there are some pics of the hull on the bff but I am not allowed to veiw there site. Me and the fat irish puke that owns that site do not get along he has blocked me form seeing it.

This is totally uncalled for. I presume you are talking about Paul, and he had good reasons to ban you from the BFF. Besides that, AFAIK he does not own the BFF but rather he manages it for Brian. You also now know that you were never blocked from reading that forum.

 

[catbasket]

Howdy Creekfreak!

Sorry I haven't posted to one of your threads for a while - things have been a bit hectic recently. Just in case I've missed any major developments in the last couple of months could you answer a couple of questions for me?

1. Had any good conversations with bigfoot recently?

Oh and yes they do understand english and can speak it also .

2. Have you made any progress on getting your bigfoot hair and DNA samples analysed?

Why dont you ask him why he hasent responed to my hair sample that was sent to him ? And why hasent the palm dates that I have in my frezzer that could have dna on them that I think a bigfoot has sucked the juice out of have not been asked for ?

 

[Locknar]

From another thread:

Your right hist he is part of the smear faction they hide behind a computer screen becouse they know they will get there ass kicked in the feild .
If he came around here talking that trash he would leave a humbled man .
Show me a photo expert kit find the best in the county and have them analize the sd card then Ill will beleave you my picture is not real .
But that wont prove bigfoot is not real your going to have to have the hair samples dna tested also .
Then your going to have to explane the 8 foot man beast I walked up on in my back yard good enough to explaine why it was not a bigfoot a bear anit going to get it son it wasent a bear .
You cant explaine that can you the nsa doesent train you for eraseing memory .
Your nothing give up the act .

Truth be told, your "BF" photo has in fact been viewed by various experts (some of your own choosing) and ALL have concluded it is a photoshoped/altered picture. Added to this is your claim that you had "experts" view and proclaim your photo as genuine...yet refuse to post their reports, names, or any other supporting information. Further, your own recklessness in terms of handling, documentation (or lack there of), etc. render anything you may find as useless.

You continue to proclaim this DNA you have, yet still have not had it tested; why is that? Certainly if your claim were credible, there are any number of "professional" BF researchers that would fund such testing.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need to approach the topic in a serious manner. Your "Cletus the Slackjawed Yokel" (The Simpsons) tact, insults, and baseless or otherwise false claims you make, do nothing but damage any credibility you might have or hope to establish.

 

[William Parcher]

This is a Bigfoot Primate Research Lab! You can click on "Pictures" to see all sorts of pics of this Bigfootmobile.

The Research Vehicle was purchased used in the fall of 2001. A local Veterinarian was using it as a Mobile Veterinarian Clinic. Work was immediately started to accommodate a wide range of video and audio surveillance equipment as well as a shower, toilet and pull out bed. Also included is a Honda 4500-watt gas powered generator and four heavy duty 12VDC Gel-Cell batteries which supply all power to the surveillance equipment. The 25 foot extendable mast was installed to give the Raytheon NightSight 200 Thermal Imaging System a birds eye view of the surrounding countryside. Located on the roof of the research vehicle is a 360-Degree Perimeter viewing camera of my own design. The camera allows you to see a full 360-degree panoramic view of the surrounding area on one video monitor....

 

[EHocking]

...Lock I got the IBW pics back last night you cant see the damm bird very good so I gave them to clif to scan so we could zoom them on a computer .
Then ill send them to russo so he can photoshop an IBW in them you know standerd proceedure stuff for us hoxers .

So it's been 2 weeks. Any chance of seeing a scan of the woodpecker photo?

 

[Locknar]

If there are so many experts on this forum why cant they figure out that my bigfoot pic is real ?

Umm....I'm gonna go with because your "BF" pic is obviously photoshopped, and with no "chain of custody" or extensive notes/documentation totally, 100% worthless.

Anytime you'd like to invite the many experts you claim have looked and "verified" your pic here to discuss - that would be grand! Or...you could provide their reports/findings here (such as PetersCreak did) for all to see vs just blather about a silly claim with no proof.

Really...as the saying goes "put up or shut up" wrt your pic; I'm not trying to be harsh but continuing about a obviously fake picture just makes you look like a hoaxer.

 

[Creekfreak]

I put it up lock and none of you proved it to be a hoax I have explained over and over nothing was added to that picture .
I asked to see your experts that you say are on this forum not a hobbiest is PC an expert in photo forensics ?
I dident think so .
To begin with why hasent anyone asked to see the sd card ?
Dont you think that would be a good place to start a real expert would ask to analize the card none of your experts asked why is that ?
So as it stands the picture is real as I have said all along you have proven nothing .
Bting on the real experts lets get this over with I do beleave the FBI could tell us if it is real or not why dont you call them ?

 

[zooman63]

Creek..Just a couple of constructive points.. Well, maybe not so constructive..I think you should call your Tower Boat,...The "Collapse-So". Kinda like Cousteaus "Calypso", but without all those "get in your way" saftey features. Also, the Camouflage detail you didon it is impressive..as far as I can tell from photo#3 on pg. 40 line 1569 of this thread, you must be using Romulan Cloaking Technology (or RCT as we say in the trade, eh Creek)) to hide the camo effect. Good thinking!! Clever my man, c-l-e-v-e-r!

Edited by chillzero: 

Edit for civility appropriate to moderated thread.

 

[zooman63]

Using a "Stealth" boat for Bigfoot research and surveillance..Brilliant!! Normally, I'd just use standard "walk-in-the -woods" type equipment such as, boots and clothes. Maybe a camera, a notepad, binoculars.., how on earth are you gonna drag that heavy contraption through the tree's and bushes? Is that what the Kitty cat is for? What kinda harness do you put on her? Or does she use her telekinesis to propel said craft through the forest...Better have another surveillance boat stationed inside your trailer, just in case the local bigfoot population around you gets a hankerin' for some beenie weenies in your kitchen pantry. And have some cool refreshments poured, 'cause we all know how Bigfootin' all day really gits your thirst up..I suggest you just get up into that tower, (you may have to cut a hole in your trailer's roof) and have the camera ready to capture all the action when they know there's a free meal waiting in your home, just a few feet away from the safty and security of the woods where they've been elusively hiding (sucessfully, until you came along) since God knows when.. Be sure to post all the pics asap! And take notes too: Like this : Feb. 16/2008, 3:14 pm : Little bigfoot baby poops on linoleum by door, Big male pee's in sink while eating can of beans..3:16pm feb. 16/2008, ..difficult to observe whole kitchen where Bigfoot family is congregated..boat obscuring my view..

 

[bruto]

I put it up lock and none of you proved it to be a hoax I have explained over and over nothing was added to that picture .
I asked to see your experts that you say are on this forum not a hobbiest is PC an expert in photo forensics ?
I dident think so .
To begin with why hasent anyone asked to see the sd card ?
Dont you think that would be a good place to start a real expert would ask to analize the card none of your experts asked why is that ?
So as it stands the picture is real as I have said all along you have proven nothing .
Bting on the real experts lets get this over with I do beleave the FBI could tell us if it is real or not why dont you call them ?

You seem to miss the point. Nobody has alleged, as far as I know, that the original photo is NOT authentic. What has been alleged is that the "enhanced" photo, which in all versions we've seen is missing its EXIF data, is altered in ways that go beyond enhancement. Your SD card, should we examine it, would not hold that enhanced photo, the one which is in dispute, but the originals, which appear both to be authentic and to be devoid of bigfoot, and which cannot be coaxed into revealing a bigfoot without the addition of data, such as appears to have been done rather clumsily in the "ehnanced" photo. It is of no importance, really, who did the enhancing, but whoever did it, dishonestly or not, corrupted the visual data in the doing, and this makes the enhanced photo worthless as evidence.

Nobody has to prove anything here but you.

 

[LTC8K6]

I put it up lock and none of you proved it to be a hoax

That is not true, creekfreak. I personally proved it was a hoax. Others did as well.

I used a lot of my own time on that photo and I don't appreciate your continued telling of lies about the photo and the examinations of it.

 

[Locknar]

I put it up lock and none of you proved it to be a hoax I have explained over and over nothing was added to that picture .
I asked to see your experts that you say are on this forum not a hobbiest is PC an expert in photo forensics ?
I dident think so .
To begin with why hasent anyone asked to see the sd card ?
Dont you think that would be a good place to start a real expert would ask to analize the card none of your experts asked why is that ?
So as it stands the picture is real as I have said all along you have proven nothing .
Bting on the real experts lets get this over with I do beleave the FBI could tell us if it is real or not why dont you call them ?

Actually, everyone has proven it is a hoax. You claimed to have experts that stated otherwise...why can't/won't you provide their comments? Your lack of understanding as to why it is a hoax really does not change the fact that it is a hoax.

I believe you are making a grave error in saying that PetersCreek (or others) is a "hobbiest".

The SD card...I don't see your point. You have a SD card, with no chain of custody, no established protocols, etc. What would "seeing" the SD card do for anyone...other then to say "yep, its a SD card"; one you have no accounting for its custody, or who has done what to it.

Why would I call the FBI (or anyone for that matter) to prove your claim?

Your rather temper tantrum "It's real because I say it is" rants do not establish your pictures credibility.

With "BF" being so abundent in your area, I don't understand why you've only gotten this one hoaxed picture. For that matter, you claim there are LOTS of other witnesses (the 20 you had mentioned, you've also now mentioned hunters) and yet none of them will come forward?

Really...it is just to funny.

 

[Creekfreak]

Zoom I dont recall ever posting a picture of the boat with camo you must have me mixed up with someone else .
There is nothing Collapseable on this boat its rock solid with all the safety equipment needed .
Yes you can use it on land as a observation platfrom as well as in the water a poachers dream in your case .
And BTW that is no she cat that is a man cat the war lord of northern wettapo creek .


So now bruto your saying the EXIF files are not on the photos ?
If that is so then everything that has been said about these photos is null and vold .
Like Ive said all along you have not proven anything .
Just becouse I am an honest man I am willing to let a real photo expert look at the sd card and make a final judgement but you will have to find that expert that everyone can agree is an expert .
If you dont then I am right you have not proven it to be a hoax I say I am right prove me wrong or are you not up for the challange ?
I dont think you are prove me wrong .