Bigfoot Hunter at it again

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Shrike said:
No, first we can just ask "why?" Is he implying that it takes at least 5, big, fully-funded, blah blah blah to find a "cryptid?" It didn't take 5 such expeditions to find gorillas and okapis. Heck, we found coelocanths without even looking for them.
Click to expand...

None of them took a short time to find though. They did require patience
 
Skeptical Greg said:
Name me one, fully -funded entity, who thinks searching for Bigfoot is a worthwhile endeavor ...

( ... and don't say ' Monsterquest ' ... hint: they are not searching for Bigfoot ... )
Click to expand...

Wally Hermson, who has yet to supply those Texas Rangers with Thermal cameras
 
The Dire wolf and the short-faced bear still living in places where people don't go very much. If you think that is wrong, you had better mount numerous huge expeditions to prove it, buddy.
 
There are lots of people looking for bigfoot. There was a recent trip to Dolly Sods checking out a report. There are many people in the backwoods besides bigfoot fanatics. Despite the number of people out still no confirmation of bigfoot.
 
hokie said:
There are lots of people looking for bigfoot. There was a recent trip to Dolly Sods checking out a report. There are many people in the backwoods besides bigfoot fanatics. Despite the number of people out still no confirmation of bigfoot.
Click to expand...

That is a rash generalization. Check out a report could mean spending 5 minutes looking at the landscape of the area and saying "pack it up, boys, nothing to see here".
 
William Parcher said:
The Dire wolf and the short-faced bear still living in places where people don't go very much. If you think that is wrong, you had better mount numerous huge expeditions to prove it, buddy.
Click to expand...

The Short-Faced Bear Lives in one, if not the most, unexplored Country in the world Russia, which could EASILY hide any kind of animal.
 
makaya325 said:
Wrong. I am actually correct on the fact that Nobody or organization is spending a considerable amount of time looking for bigfoot, day in and day out, out there 24/7.
Click to expand...

You're suggesting that this level of effort was necessary to "discover" gorillas and okapis?

Look, if you're going to be this far detached from reality, then it isn't going to be much fun trading barbs with you about this. My barbs have sharp points while yours seem to be made of raw pizza dough.
 
The Shrike said:
You're suggesting that this level of effort was necessary to "discover" gorillas and okapis?

Look, if you're going to be this far detached from reality, then it isn't going to be much fun trading barbs with you about this. My barbs have sharp points while yours seem to be made of raw pizza dough.
Click to expand...

No, but I am saying that it did not take a short time to find either one.
 
makaya325 said:
Wrong. I am actually correct on the fact that Nobody or organization is spending a considerable amount of time looking for bigfoot, day in and day out, out there 24/7.
Click to expand...
Yes, you are correct..

Why do you think no organization with the resources is spending a considerable amount of time looking for unicorns, T-Rex, mastodons, Nessy, or Bigfoot, day in and day out, out there 24/7?
 
That is a rash generalization. Check out a report could mean spending 5 minutes looking at the landscape of the area and saying "pack it up, boys, nothing to see here".
Click to expand...
Did you look into what they did? Of course, not. If you had checked you would make such foolish looking statements.
 
Wrong. I am actually correct on the fact that Nobody or organization is spending a considerable amount of time looking for bigfoot, day in and day out, out there 24/7.
Click to expand...
Hardly matters that the intent is to look for bigfoot. There are still many people out there and still no confirmation of bigfoot.
 
Maka's questions have been covered.

I was wondering if anyone had thought about the original claim in the PA video of hearing something in the woods. The still from the video looks like a tree trunk. But what about the sound. I suspect a bird. It has to be loud. What about an owl?
 
Skeptical Greg said:
Yes, you are correct..

Why do you think no organization with the resources is spending a considerable amount of time looking for unicorns, T-Rex, mastodons, Nessy, or Bigfoot, day in and day out, out there 24/7?
Click to expand...

Because, at least Bigfoot is more plausible than Nessy and Unicorns.
 
hokie said:
Maka's questions have been covered.

I was wondering if anyone had thought about the original claim in the PA video of hearing something in the woods. The still from the video looks like a tree trunk. But what about the sound. I suspect a bird. It has to be loud. What about an owl?
Click to expand...

It seems the video is being kept under wraps.
Time to edit/clean up/ add to it?
Seems like youve all been here before :)
 
Because, at least Bigfoot is more plausible than Nessy and Unicorns.
Click to expand...

Wait...didn't you once claim to have seen Ogo Pogo? If lake monsters are less plausible than Bigfoot, it's interesting that you managed to see one.

makaya325 said:
Do Unicorns leave tracks? poop? Hairs?
Click to expand...

And it has been proven that Bigfoot does...where? Let's see that conclusive, without a shadow of a doubt evidence, Gomer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom