• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Bigfoot follies

Status
Not open for further replies.
You mean like this?

5 days earlier, this trail was walked and that was not there. No wind storms during that time either.

A few weeks ago I could have taken the exact same picture of a tree broken, about 25-30 cm diameter (1 foot?), and no storm the day before (i go thru there every day to go to work). So what ? Are you going to tell me there is bigfoot in Frankfurt am main too ?

Tree weaken and break all the time. Even that size.
 
Last edited:
A few weeks ago I could have taken the exact same picture of a tree broken, about 25-30 cm diameter (1 foot?), and no storm the day before (i go thru there every day to go to work). So what ? Are you going to tell me there is bigfoot in Frankfurt am main too ?

Tree weaken and break all the time. Even that size.

Please see my post 2603. Thanks
 
Have you put any of these gates across bigfoot trails?

You would think that bigfoot would remove your gates if he understands the concept.

Knock a tree over on one of their trails. Or several. It should offend them and provoke a reaction, since they clearly understand the concept of blocking the road and sending a message about territory.
 
But if you want your tree trunk gate to be left completely alone by Bigfoot then just aim a trail camera at it.

It's also a 100% effective way to prevent Bigfoot from messing with anything at all. Aim a trail camera at it.

Tired of having your cabin pelted with rocks in the middle of the night? Put out some trail cameras. Done.
 
But if you want your tree trunk gate to be left completely alone by Bigfoot then just aim a trail camera at it.

It's also a 100% effective way to prevent Bigfoot from messing with anything at all. Aim a trail camera at it.

Tired of having your cabin pelted with rocks in the middle of the night? Put out some trail cameras. Done.

I know you are being facetious but this is actually a true statement.
 
Personally, I don't think the Boss of the Woods, Bigfoot, would give a Rat's Arse if puny humans are in the woods. He would go around eating, impressing his female Bigfoots and avoiding trailcams. Just like the Mountain Gorillas do, (except for the avoiding trailcams part). Saving his energy to fight off OTHER Bigfoots, not wasting it on the stoopid puny humans.

You know, kind of like this guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2g5XwGrbtY

Or this guy, he even takes a selfie with a tourist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prqLwRtzU6U
 
Last edited:
I know you are being facetious but this is actually a true statement.

Well, trivially "true" in the sense that pointing a trail camera at a fallen tree will not result in a picture of a 'Squatch, yes.

"True" in the sense that it is the camera (rather than, say, the utter lack of any giant, previously undiscovered, North American primate) that is the reason that no such picture will result? Not so much.
 
NL,
Thanks for the pictures, but I’m really asking for a picture of the actual 24” oak that BB is talking about. That simple request was made by several members at the BFF, but no pic was ever posted. I’m reasonably sure there is no broken tree. It is one thing to say a BF broke a tree the size of the ones you posted. If bigfoot was a real animal, you might believe that it could break a 10-12” evergreen off 8-10’ from the ground. Crawl up, bend it over – crack. But when someone says a 24” dia healthy oak tree broken off 2’ from ground, it goes way beyond belief. That is the Catch-22 of bigfoot stories. Kind of like horror movies, each one that comes out needs to “one-up” the last or people won’t come see them. With bigfoot, the same-old story of finding a footprint, or seeing a quick glimpse isn’t good enough anymore. Stories have evolved…from what once was a shy ape-man, we progressed =>howling=>wood-knocking=>rock-throwing=>stick-structure making=>pig-tossing=>camera-avoiding=>infrasound-blasting=>mind-raping=>native-flute-loving=>24” Oak-breaking=>30mph running=>gifting, sometimes sweet, sometimes sour wood ape. You have to “one-up” the norm or you won’t get noticed. So, before getting involved in coming up with explanations of how the tree was broken and what kind of animal BB saw run away, prove to me there actually is a broken 24” healthy oak tree. A simple pic from any of the NAWAC could do this, but it will never happen. No broken tree, no animal running away – just a story. Even some of the faithful BFF’ers finally realized what was going on because he went too far.
The same applies to your Good-n-Plenty story. IIRC, your friend spilled a few GnP’s at some point during the day while you were out looking for BF. Then, around 1 or 2 in the morning, a GnP was tossed out of the swamp, over the campfire and into the guy who spilled the GnP’s chair. What you are asking us to believe is that Bigfoot either saw your friend spill the candy (or else came across the candy, but knew who’s it was) then carried it around for hours, sneaking through the swamp up to your campfire, close enough to make the perfect throw on the first try, but far enough away not to get caught and then sneaked silently back into the swamp. Even if bigfoot was a real animal, your story makes no sense.
 
Wanna prove an animal is in the area? Here's my true life example from yesterday:
Someone told me there's moose around here:
hy3adamy.jpg

So I went for a walk after work with a bucket of plaster and 2 water bottles.
Found these:
qatezune.jpg

Mixed up some plaster and poured like this:
qejatuju.jpg

Waited for a bit:
uzupezap.jpg

And got this:
9aqa4aze.jpg

Total elapsed time: 1.5 hours.
Also saw lots of poop.
If BF was real, there'd be countless clear tracks from "hotspots", plenty of poop, hairs, and photos.
Case closed.
BF "expeditions" that come back with tales of tossed pebbles and broken trees are plainly obvious ghost story playtime adventures. They can't even be bothered to fake tracks anymore. For shame.
 
For those who don't know yet, there is a physics conversation about the NAWAC Area X Wood Ape tree break going on in the JREF Science forum over here.
 
I wonder if Bigfoot would also totally avoid a fake trail camera (just the plastic body) or avoid a photo of a trail camera tacked to a tree.
 
Wanna prove an animal is in the area? Here's my true life example from yesterday:
Someone told me there's moose around here:
Total elapsed time: 1.5 hours.
Also saw lots of poop.
If BF was real, there'd be countless clear tracks from "hotspots", plenty of poop, hairs, and photos.
Case closed.
BF "expeditions" that come back with tales of tossed pebbles and broken trees are plainly obvious ghost story playtime adventures. They can't even be bothered to fake tracks anymore. For shame.

There are an estimated 300,000 moose in the US and between 500,000 and 1,000,000 in Canada. Of all the population estimates I've heard for sasquatch, the largest was 25,000 and the smallest of 700 (Meldrum). It's not that easy.
 
There are an estimated 300,000 moose in the US and between 500,000 and 1,000,000 in Canada. Of all the population estimates I've heard for sasquatch, the largest was 25,000 and the smallest of 700 (Meldrum). It's not that easy.


It should be.
You have them flinging candy at you for crying out loud. No tracks and no poop though.
 
Why does bigfoot think that a dead tree across a trail will bother a human?

Is bigfoot unaware that trees commonly fall in the forest?

Is bigfoot also unaware of chain saws and their ability to rapidly remove trees?

If a tree falls in in the forest and nobody is there then bigfoot did it.
 
Poop would be a great hoax. Accumulate a week's worth of your own dumps and then put it all together next to a broken tree and then the chimp hairs too.

People need to start escalating the hoaxes because its all getting rather boring. Better still would be to flip a Bigfooter's car upside-down and put the poop and hairs on the muffler.
 
There are an estimated 300,000 moose in the US and between 500,000 and 1,000,000 in Canada. Of all the population estimates I've heard for sasquatch, the largest was 25,000 and the smallest of 700 (Meldrum). It's not that easy.

There was a fellow on the BFF that estimated the bigfoot population to be several million. Another fellow chimed in and said he believed there may even be more of them than us.

True story.
 
There are an estimated 300,000 moose in the US and between 500,000 and 1,000,000 in Canada. Of all the population estimates I've heard for sasquatch, the largest was 25,000 and the smallest of 700 (Meldrum). It's not that easy.

The historical North American grizzly population was somewhere around 50,000 and nearly all were extirpated in the lower 48. Much of this annihilation occurred in what many consider to be prime footie habitat. During this exploitation, not one, not a single bigfoot was ever harvested. Not only is that not easy to do, it's impossible.
 
...This is tantamount to wandering around a city and playing the personal incredulity game because some windows are open and others are shut. Being "open" to all explanations, but favoring space aliens using them as entry points to steal food.
:D "Yer killin' me Smalls!"

...BF "expeditions" that come back with tales of tossed pebbles and broken trees are plainly obvious ghost story playtime adventures. They can't even be bothered to fake tracks anymore. For shame.
:D That's true huh. Good one. You'd think with the plethora of Wood Ape™ "sightings" they've had they'd have conjured a track or two also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom