Bigfoot DNA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jodie said:
If they participated on the BFF in the last two years then they have no excuse. The real intent of those articles were discussed ad nauseum on that forum. Because those articles are posted on the BFF it disqualifies any excuse the footers might concoct about her being duped. She is a college graduate with a working doctorate, she should have enough sense to recognize what the articles were about. That leaves three possibilities:

1. She knew and didn't care because it was a lost cause once Wally's pay check stopped coming.
2. She didn't write the paper and foisted it off on Robin Lynn, who didn't know any better.
3. She really is that stupid.
Click to expand...

4. She really thinks her audience is that stupid
 
TheJackal said:
So, let's just digest what Ketchum says. It was the referee that made her do it. So, if we extrapolate, then there are two possible conclusions based upon her statement. One, the referee realized what a joke her paper really was and forced her to reference a blatant April Fools joke; or, two, the referee was not qualifed to review the paper, and forced inclusion of a blatant April Fools joke out of ignorance. Of course, all this assumes you can take her statement at face value. If you disagreed with the referee, do you not think an editor from such a highly respected journal as DeNovo would have chosen to edit out an obvious April Fools joke from the references to maintian the journal's integrity ? Someone help me out here
Click to expand...


Speaking of journals, editors and referees, there supposedly was a precurser to DeNovo: it was called the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology, and it was supposedly sponsored by a foundation, whose supposed administrator named Casey Mullins was supposedly the editor of the Journal, and the whole kit and caboodle supposedly had a lawyer. And yet, strange to tell, the entire package supposedly appeared, briefly (supposedly) did its thing, and then quickly disappeared (THAT is a fact), kind of like a dog fart during Sunday dinner, without a sound and with only the hint of a foul odor left behind... almost, you might say, like it never existed.

Yes, brothers and sisters: the journal, the foundation, the editor, the supposed reviewers, the lawyer...they are all as gone as those little kids in the National Parks that David Paulides wrote about in Missing: 411.

My question: where is this supposed editor Casey Mullins person who doesn't even have a working email account or internet presence [but never mind] but nonetheless was the supposed editor of the supposed journal sponsored by a supposed foundation ( that also doesn't have an internet presence or an email address) that she supposedly worked for; which supposed journal supposedly passed the paper through a supposedly genuine peer review.

And where is the supposed lawyer for that supposed Casey Mullins/supposed journal/supposed foundation, who supposedly kiboshed the supposedly successfully peer reviewed paper, so as a supposed result Ketchum supposedly had to buy the supposed journal from the supposed foundation and supposedly transmogrify it into the [cough] "DeNovo [supposedly] Scientific Journal?"

I mean, Jackal, with all due respect: what is 'face value' these days?

Just askin.....
 
Last edited:
Jodie said:
If they participated on the BFF in the last two years then they have no excuse. The real intent of those articles were discussed ad nauseum on that forum. Because those articles are posted on the BFF it disqualifies any excuse the footers might concoct about her being duped. She is a college graduate with a working doctorate, she should have enough sense to recognize what the articles were about. That leaves three possibilities:

1. She knew and didn't care because it was a lost cause once Wally's pay check stopped coming.
2. She didn't write the paper and foisted it off on Robin Lynn, who didn't know any better.
3. She really is that stupid.
Click to expand...



I suspect that there's a fourth...


4. She slapped the paper together, but, she never even read the damned things.

Flunkie #1: "Don't you need some reference type things to make it look smart and stuff?"
Melba: "Yeah, I guess. What have you got?"
Flunkie #1: "How about these? You should have a look."
Melba: "This isn't rocket science. Just give me the overall vibe."
Flunkie #1: "They're pretty cool about Bigfoot."
Melba: "Sweet. Now we're cooking. Stick 'em in. Let's get some doughnuts."
 
I'm sorry, this is the level of writing we get from a veterinarian?

"Do to the wild rumors out on the internet. I felt it important to address a new rumor about a possible hoax. First we have never hoaxed anything as there is no need to. We have the proof we need in the science. I hope this helps everyone understand."

That would be about D-level work for my undergraduates. Are we sure that the person who wrote this even has a Bachelor's degree?
 
The Shrike said:
I'm sorry, this is the level of writing we get from a veterinarian?

"Do to the wild rumors out on the internet. I felt it important to address a new rumor about a possible hoax. First we have never hoaxed anything as there is no need to. We have the proof we need in the science. I hope this helps everyone understand."

That would be about D-level work for my undergraduates. Are we sure that the person who wrote this even has a Bachelor's degree?
Click to expand...

I guess it didn't help you understand. Perhaps do to the fact you didn't see the proof in the science.
 
Last edited:
What people saw it in person, and why does that mean it wasn't an adulterated mask if they did?
 
parnassus said:
Many months ago, at the end of 2010 or early 2011, there was speculation about whether and how one could seem to "prove" bigfoot through DNA analysis. Based partly on the Native American mtDNA mistakenly touted as bigfoots in the Snelgrove Lake fiasco, I speculated that one could, if one wished, obtain samples from some isolated tribal group that wasn't yet in GenBank, then possibly mail them in to an unsuspecting lab from post offices all over the country. That way, the lab would naively think that they had identified "novel" DNA from related individuals all over North America. Quite a theory, eh? Some people ridiculed my plan as too complicated, too expensive.
Click to expand...

I thought you had a very good idea on this, I briefly brought it up on the bff back then but was quickly shot down, it only showed me that they didn't want to hear other explanations for unknown DNA, I get a good laugh out of what they have now ~ At least the pigmy DNA would have had some intelligence and forethought connected to it, now all they have is some Smeja DNA mixed with thousands of footers tears and the pain of defeat, it is a game with them after all, it sure is not about science or the truth.

Tim :)
 
It would appear that Mr. Moneymaker sees a few chinks in the veneer of bigfoot and is trying to stop the bleeding. I wonder if they will gin up some kind of bigfoot sighting that we can actually see on Finding Bigfoot to keep the ball rolling.
 
William Parcher said:
Bigfoot lifts us up where we belong.

(The Bigfooters)
Click to expand...
:D Comedy gold.

parnassus said:
Seems I was wrong...
...or was I...?

<brevity snip>

...big yap shut.
Click to expand...
Interesting. I'd say you were 'righter' than 'wronger'. Hers was some sort of imported Wal-Mart version of that scheme. And what yer really saying is in TheMelba's book of standards and practices for Establishing a Whole New Species With Nothing But Anonymous DNA While In A Constant State Of Ethanol Drunkenness, a little bit of bleach can go a long way?

Ph.D or not, I'm now not so convinced she's even savvy enough to know about the popular 'daddy gets on top of mommy or other mommies that look like her' method of DNA exchange that's all the rage nowadays. Seriou...

LTC8K6 said:
http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/moneymaker-refutes-munns/

Moneymaker Refutes Munns (on Matilda)
Click to expand...
But, but...but then that would mean all us idiots here are wrong?! Then again, ya can't fight fate. That's it folks, we got us a Bigfoot. Of course it's identical to a major movie character mask sold at Shhh Don't Tell™ stores nationwide, but still. What are the chances?
 
I wonder if Bill consulted with Dr. Meldrum before releasing this info about the Chewbacca Defense.

Certainly Bill and Dr. Meldrum might see a shift their way in private Bigfoot funding, if the Ketchum project went balls up.
 
Meldrum and Munns are smart and know better their audience. Both, as far as I know, never made claims like Melba's or the GABoyz's, for example. They never promissed to deliver one evidence to rule them all. So, their business continue while others come and go bust. The others come, make promisses about a paper, a body, whatever, while M&M keep a low profile. Footers flock to the new prophets and then, when down the drain it all go, they return to their tried, old, reliable, trusty guides.

Meldrum's position and profits are steady, he built through the years a consolidated group of followers and a reputation among bigfootery circles. The noobies come and go, have a spike in their profits and followers' numbers and then drop down to zero. Their followers' numbers drop and then they are reduced to nothing but the most fanatic, deluded, naïve, gullible, ignorant people. In the meanwhile, Meldrum, Gimlim and Munns continue and are ready to wellcome back to the flock those who stranded.

I bet you can see this happening now.
 
I've got to say as someone fairly new to this whole BF thing, this is all an incredibly fascinating study in human behavior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom