hold on everybody, lets look at this sytematically
geeze, i knew this would happen, melbas spys informed her that I had a very busy day today, so it was time to release the hounds! Guys I have to administer 200 essay exams today, then guess what, I have to read them!
OK so I think we can and should go about this in a very systematic way, and many of you would be willing to pitch in a little of your time.
I suggest we start with the list of authors.
First thing we need to know is are all of the authors actually on board with this?
each should be contacted - IN A VERY POLITE WAY, either by email or phone. They should be asked 3 questions - VERY RESPECTFULLY,
1. are they aware they are listed as a co-author on this paper?
2. If so, can they tell you how they were involved? writing? analyzing the genome? preparing samples for sequencing? Doing the actual sequensing?
3. Do they realize the paper is claiming the existance of bigfoot, as a hibred human entity.
Thats it, no confrontation, no real followup (unless they want to talk, then you ought to listen closely).
I see that as step one of a very reasoned approach to examining this paper and it's extraordinary claims.
Going over and analyzing the data may take time, but first, lets examine the participation of the authors.
If anyone wants to tackle part of that, i guess just let me know, so we can divide up the work. We really do not need 15 people calling each and every one of them!
CWB