Bigfoot DNA

[Vortigern99]

If you didn't mean it, why did you type "Meldrum lied", which you've now gone back and edited out?

 

[OntarioSquatch]

OS, you cherry-pick points to argue and ignore the rest. Are we to take your silence on the dozens of counterarguments we've made in these threads as your concession of defeat on those points? Or do you prefer to ignore all logic and reason, and continue to live in a fantasy world with your fingers in your ears chanting "lalalalalabigfootexistslalalala"?

I have trouble responding to every point and comment that's brought up. To some of them I ave no idea what to say. things like "there is not a molecule of evidence for Bigfoot".

All I can say is there is.

 

[OntarioSquatch]

If you didn't mean it, why did you type "Meldrum lied", which you've now gone back and edited out?

lol. I absolutely did not type such a thing. I know Meldrum wasn't lying. He simply overlooked the sample.

 

[Vortigern99]

I have trouble responding to every point and comment that's brought up. To some of them I ave no idea what to say. things like "there is not a molecule of evidence for Bigfoot".

All I can say is there is.

Post evidence. Links to evidence. Something, anything that supports your contentions. Argument by assertion is a logical fallacy.

lol. I absolutely did not type such a thing.

You're lying. I read it, and before I could quote it you changed it. I'm done here.

 

[I am Bigfoot]

I never ment he was lying. He was simply mistaken.

Do you ever plan to really address the substantive arguments made towards you?

I mean...without an actual god damned sasquatch body you pretty much cannot prove, at all, that ANY sample came from sasquatch. But the samples came back human...So they are STILL sasquatch. Even though there was no good reason to think they were in the first place.

Do you see the problem with that?

 

[GT/CS]

Oh, no.

Ontario, blind editing a post to cover your ass, and then lying about it, is the ultimate sin here.

If that's what happened I suggest you fess up, apologize, and hope for the best.

 

[aboman]

I think that if you look back to post #1518 at the part that is quoted by I am Bigfoot it looks like he was saying Ketchum would have to lie for Meldrum to be right... I guess we'll know when Sykes publishes (assuming he'll include a test of the steak sample).

 

[Vortigern99]

Hey Aboman, welcome to the forums!

 

[OntarioSquatch]

Dudes. I did not type "Meldrum lied". Hopefully Vortigern99 only misinterpreted the post. Right now it looks like character defamation. I know some of us here don't want to believe Bigfoot exists, but lying like that is morally wrong.

 

[I am Bigfoot]

lol. I absolutely did not type such a thing. I know Meldrum wasn't lying. He simply overlooked the sample.

He didn't overlook a sample. He misrepresented what it was.

 

[aboman]

Thanks

 

[Vortigern99]

dudes. I did not type "meldrum lied". Hopefully vortigern99 misinterpreted the post. Right now it looks like character defamation. I know some of us here don't want to believe bigfoot exists, but lying like that is morally wrong.

You are lying.

 

[I am Bigfoot]

Dudes. I did not type "Meldrum lied". Hopefully Vortigern99 misinterpreted the post. Right now it looks like character defamation. I know some of us here don't want to believe Bigfoot exists, but lying like that is morally wrong.

So is lying about there being evidence for bigfoot.

You keep saying there is, but you don't back that up. The PGF doesn't count because of reasons detailed in that/those thread/s

 

[OntarioSquatch]

You are lying.

Ask a mod to view the posts history if they can. I did not type meldrum lied.

 

[Vortigern99]

Sure you did.

ETA: Unless you care to admit that seeing a thing and having a thing exist objectively are two different things.

 

[OntarioSquatch]

Sure you did.

ETA: Unless you care to admit that seeing a thing and having a thing exist objectively are two different things.

I think we know who is lying.

Yes, I do know seeing something can be different from that something actually existing. People's minds can play tricks.

 

[I am Bigfoot]

Honestly I don't care a whole lot either way if he lied. I think it is a pointless path to travel down at the moment.
I feel like it is distracting from the discussion.

 

[Vortigern99]

This is actually quite instructive.

I am absolutely certain I read the phrase "Meldrum lied" in the post OS edited to change, upthread. As far as I know and can recall, I'm making a factual claim.

I'm a credible source, as my posting history will show. I've never been suspended from the JREF for belligerence or lying or for any other reason; I've never been accused of making untruthful claims.

I might have hallucinated seeing the phrase "Meldrum lied", though. I might simply have imagined it. Or I might have wanted to see it so much that I convinced myself I did see it.

I might have expected to see it, and my brain just fed me the information it anticipated gathering anyway.

Or, I'm making it up.

OS, do you see how this exchange can be applied to bigfoot sighting claims? Why would you take those reports at their word? All of the above provisos and possibilities can explain bigfoot sightings, too.

People lie, misidentify and mistake seeing and experiencing things all the time. Since anecdotes are all we have to support bigfoot's existence, we can safely discard all that as potential fraud and errors, and look instead for objective, physical evidence.

So far, none exists.

 

[OntarioSquatch]

This is actually quite instructive.

I am absolutely certain I read the phrase "Meldrum lied" in the post OS edited to change, upthread. As far as I know and can recall, I'm making a factual claim.

As long as you've actually read it I'm ok. Cuz it would only mean misinterpretation. I was thinking you were lying about it. Anyway, it's been fun discussing things.

 

[AlaskaBushPilot]

I'm still waiting for your most credible sighting, Squatch.

Any sighting. You said there were so many.