Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Land animals that live in the PNW, but are not unique, and have hides, scales, skins or feathers that don't have any markings on them that might help them hide in their environment, that are not rather tiny and quick, don't look like Hummingbirds or moths and are not transparent, are easier to see than animals in the air or in the water".

Is that a concept even worth grasping for?
 
Keep moving those goal posts.

So now, if I have this straight, your assertion is that,

"Land animals that live in the PNW, but are not unique, and have hides, scales, skins or feathers that don't have any markings on them that might help them hide in their environment, that are not rather tiny and quick, don't look like Hummingbirds or moths and are not transparent, are easier to see than animals in the air or in the water".

I concede, you are definitely on to something here.
How could I have been so wrong...:rolleyes:

Ahhhhh!! Listen, here me out:

Animals that actually live in the same enviornments as humans are very unlikely to be mistaken for something else. Sure, a sea serpent may be mistaken for many things because its long and narrow. Bigfoot, on the other hand, pretty much resembles a hairy human of extraordinary proportions: What known animal resembles that? Nothing.

Just because bigfoot doesnt have many mistaken species candidates, doesnt make it any more real than Greys. One may say "You cant mistake a Grey alien for anything else because nothing on earth resembles it", which would debunk my own statement.
 
Ahhhhh!! Listen, here me out:

Animals that actually live in the same enviornments as humans are very unlikely to be mistaken for something else.
Addendum ad infinitum:
"Land animals that live in a house, in the PNW, but are not unique, and have hides, scales, skins or feathers that don't have any markings on them that might help them hide in their environment, that are not rather tiny and quick, don't look like Hummingbirds or moths and are not transparent, are easier to see than animals in the air or in the water".

Sure, a sea serpent may be mistaken for many things because its long and narrow.
Non sequitur. Does a sea serpent line in the same environment as a human?
Bigfoot, on the other hand, pretty much resembles a hairy human of extraordinary proportions: What known animal resembles that? Nothing.
or a gorilla or a bear...
Just because bigfoot doesnt have many mistaken species candidates,
I disagree.
...doesnt make it any more real than Greys. One may say "You cant mistake a Grey alien for anything else because nothing on earth resembles it", which would debunk my own statement.
What on earth does EXTRAterrestrial beings have to do with your statement that, "A person is more likely to be correct in identifying a terrestrial animal than an animal in flight."?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
This is just too precious...


He screwed up this easy one too.

makaya325 said:
Ones a racoon, which are EVERYWHERE

William Parcher said:
You fool. That's a ringtail.



cybersniper0009.jpg
 
Crap. Its the second screenie JohnWS manages to take from my desktop. Gotta check the damn firewall, antivirus, etc...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom