Beaver Hateman
Thinker
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2010
- Messages
- 176
'Patently absurd'? How, ummmmm uhhhh, so exactly? Internet squabble? Length of the article? Its existence period? Oh wait nevermind, I found it, that's just your opinion.
So anyway, are you saying Bigfooters and Bigfoot are not interrelated? Let's pretend you really are saying that (you're not, right? right?): Is Bigfoot the only subject there in that pile worth 'reporting' on and since it's supposedly not about Bigfoot it's...errr? I mean, being that silly Bigfooters are just people and people are never news-worthy? Wait, you mean that just Bigfooter people - and especially ones on the Internet - aren't news-worthy? BTW, did it occur to you that Bigfoot is in fact really and solely about Bigfooters? That they are actually, for all intents and purposes, one and the same? Probably not.
The 'reality' (that word again - whose meaning JREFitis™ often suppresses) is, and really, listen up all you 'news-worthiness' judges, news is as news does. What's not important to you might actually be important to somebody else. Unbelievable huh?! Ironically, and keeping more in line with the concept of 'honesty', I personally REALLY DON'T ******* CARE that 'this story' is or isn't 'news-worthy' - in my original original 'critique', I was mostly pointing out seeming hypocrisy - that one claiming something un-news-worthy simply because its basis was rooted on <gasp> the Internet is pretty numbskull-ish given that 'same one' apparently spends what I would deem an inordinate amount of time and energy embracing that same Internet i.e. 3,300 posts. Now, having contempt for the very things you embrace isn't a new concept, but don't be misled by thinking you won't have to ultimately answer for why that may be so.
Is your argument in the first paragraph supposed to suggest that anything people do is newsworthy? It's not about them being Bigfooters, it's about them being Bigfooters with zero public profile; who are not doing or achieving anything even in the field of Bigfoot research. I'm not going to bother with all the side issues you try and raise as I never said any of that in the first place. God forbid this isn't about JREF being better than BFF, or 'JREFers' being better than 'Bigfooters', as you seem to be reading it. I'm not hugely fond of the JREF forums, as it goes. And I'd think it similarly absurd if an argument on here found itself being seriously reported in a newspaper.
And how is a person who posts on the internet saying internet postings are not newsworthy hypocrisy? Has he ever demanded a newspaper report on his postings? Do you never do anything unless you think it ought to appear in a newspaper?