Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
Islamists, probably, Al Qaeda, not necessarily. They are far from the only extremist group in the region.
OK, maybe not Al Qaeda per se, but at least their fellow travellers.
Last edited:
Islamists, probably, Al Qaeda, not necessarily. They are far from the only extremist group in the region.
In this case I don't think so. Musharraf himself is subject to attempts on his life. You have to stop and ask if he really has the means to arrange these attempts (this is the second attempt, and this time it succeeded) and keep it secret. And I don't really see how Musharraf is now better off than he was yesterday. Sure, she was a potential political rival, but now she's a martyr and who knows what sort of instability this might lead to.
OK, maybe not Al Qaeda per se, but at least their fellow travellers.
Not likely, but what if he contracted a third party who was Islamic extremist or pretending to be and willing to sell his services? Now we have the courier. Then this third party could give money to the families of the suicide bombers as Saddam was doing to Palestinians.Granted.
As speculation goes, Musharraf is possible, but one of the most hated men in the entire world by Islamists being able to create a suicide attack?
No, she isn't a martyr. Being an assassinated public figure does not equate to martyrdom, even when one is universally popular which Bhutto was not.And I don't really see how Musharraf is now better off than he was yesterday. Sure, she was a potential political rival, but now she's a martyr and who knows what sort of instability this might lead to.
Ayup.Not likely, but what if he contracted a third party who was Islamic extremist or pretending to be and willing to sell his services? Now we have the courier. Then this third party could give money to the families of the suicide bombers as Saddam was doing to Palestinians.
That is a perfectly valid point but many politicians have risked martyrdom of their enemies before.
I'm not saying he is guilty but I'd say he is a good place to start looking. No?
Yes, sad but true.Drudgewire said:Sad but an easy one to call.
You do realize she was the Prime Minister during the mid/late 1990's, right?Could be anyone, though... a female politician in Pakistan was bound to attract some unfriendly attention.
Tamil Tigers.No, I would start with the Islamists. Is there any precedent for a suicide bomber who is not an Islamist?
Not likely, but what if he contracted a third party who was Islamic extremist or pretending to be and willing to sell his services? Now we have the courier. Then this third party could give money to the families of the suicide bombers as Saddam was doing to Palestinians.
I'm not saying i believe the Musharraf theory, but here is an even more plausible way he could have been responsible, directly or indirectly:Ayup.
I'm not sure how much Musharraf benefits from this, but I think it naive to assume he could not arrange it to happen in the manner it did. And even if it can be objectively shown that he benefits nothing, that does not mean that he would think he would not benefit.
That said, I think it more likely it wasn't Musharraf than that it was.
. Haqqani, who served as a spokesman and top aide to Bhutto for more than a decade, blamed Pakistani security, either through neglect or complicity, in her assassination. "This is the security establishment, which has always wanted her out," he said through tears.
Bhutto: "She has been Martyred"
No, I would start with the Islamists. Is there any precedent for a suicide bomber who is not an Islamist?
I'm not saying i believe the Musharraf theory, but here is an even more plausible way he could have been responsible, directly or indirectly:
By the way, there is no (perfect) security. Bombers like this guy have the initiative.your linked article said:For the past several months Pakistan has been plagued by a wave of violence that has seen hundreds of civilians killed in similar bombing attacks; and hundreds more military personnel, prompting President Pervez Musharraf to declare a state of emergency. On December 16th, Musharraf lifted the state of emergency, stating that the threat had been contained. The bombings, however, continued. Just hours before her assassination, Bhutto, 54, met with visiting Afghan President Hamid Karzai to discuss the threat of terrorism against both countries.
No, she isn't a martyr. Being an assassinated public figure does not equate to martyrdom, even when one is universally popular which Bhutto was not.
Those who achieve martyr status are exceedingly rare and rarer still in the Islamic world. Can you name any from the last fifty years?
Just days before parliamentary polls in Pakistan, leading Prime Ministerial contender and anti terrorism crusader Benazir Bhutto was shot dead during an election rally in the garrison city of Rawalpindi, near Islamabad. "She has been martyred," said party official Rehman Malik.
No, but there is lots of security that should have been perfect whose failure incontrovertibly means someone was negligent or complicit.By the way, there is no (perfect) security.
It didn't take long for the claim to be made there, just as it didn't take long for it to be made here. That is a long way from it being true.From the CNN/Time web page
It didn't take long.
“We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat [the] mujahadeen,” Al-Qaeda’s commander and main spokesperson Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid told Adnkronos International (AKI) in a phone call from an unknown location, speaking in faltering English. Al-Yazid is the main al-Qaeda commander in Afghanistan.
Maybe you could 'splain it to me. To my knowledge, the state of emergency was due to rising Islamic extremism. Also Musharraf and Bhutto were political rivals. Sorry for not giving the full quote, but the gist of it was that security looked the other way and let it happen, not performed the act itself. My knowledge of the situation is not great, though. What factors would have prevented this (security looking the other way)?Your selected quote hardly addresses the political underpinnings of the problem. Remember why the state of emergency was under attack? It was part and parcel to getting Musharraf to stand down as both leader of the army, and leader of the government.
Politics.
By the way, there is no (perfect) security. Bombers like this guy have the initiative.
DR