dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
Ben Carson:This election cycle's version of Herman Cain.
I also think the question of whether being gay is a "choice" is a red herring anyway. Does "choosing" to be gay mean that gay people are not deserving of equal rights? I think not.
I think anti-gay conservatives painted themselves into this irrelevant "choice" corner when the conversation became about SSM as a civil rights issue, one about equality. When people began asking "why should gay people be legally treated as second-class citizens when we no longer allow black people to be treated that way?" the simplistic response was "but black people have no choice! Gay people do!" The goal post was moved to the easiest place available; then came the gabbling trying to justify the position.
Religion is a choice; political ideology is a choice. No sane conservative would ever even think about making "choice" a standard for restricting those civil rights. Why gay, even if it is a choice? Because it's icky, and gay people are "other"- no matter how they try to dress it up, that is what it comes down to for most of them. Even religion is a cover for that; when they cite Paul (or whoever), all they're doing is echoing and perpetuating a bigotry that had nothing to do with the basic principles of their faith.
Ben Carson is not a stupid man; he's just trapped by a meme into a position where he, as a Christian (choice) politically conservative (choice) figure, needs to deny to others what he benefits from himself.
The new meme is "well, sexual orientation is not a protected class for civil rights, like race or religion." To which I say- "exactly; and at one time, neither was race. And people like you are the reason it should be, and soon will be, for all your caterwauling about it."
Tell Republicans that.
Being right isn't a choice. It's a burden with which some of us are born.Not to derail the thread but is there anyone at either end of the political spectrum who asserts that one's political stance is not a choice?
Tell that to the sexologists
That is the bases for the kinsey institute study on sex where they interviewed thousands of gay and transvestite's in the prison population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_Institute_for_Research_in_Sex,_Gender,_and_Reproduction
I'm not sure where you are disagreeing with Carson. Is homosexuality a choice? Well it is for people in prison, many of which remain gay.
The second point is why do liberals care so much about what Republicans think about Gays?
Oh yeah its the straw man that Republican's are racists homophobes
The OP is pathetic in his attempt to smear the opposition, why don't you find some policy that your against and debate that? Oh yeah I remember because you can't!
Paul Rubio and Mike Lee just came up with a new tax plan its more important that what ben carson thinks about gays in prison.
1. I'm sure that's a very good Wikipedia article about the Kinsey Institute. Where is the study and what does it say?Tell that to the sexologists
That is the bases for the kinsey institute study on sex where they interviewed thousands of gay and transvestite's in the prison population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_Institute_for_Research_in_Sex,_Gender,_and_Reproduction
I'm not sure where you are disagreeing with Carson. Is homosexuality a choice? Well it is for people in prison, many of which remain gay.
For a brief moment, I was going to say, "Damn you for posting what I wanted to say just 20 minutes before I signed in." But I now realize the appropriate response is "Bless you for yadda-yadda.."
Not to derail the thread but is there anyone at either end of the political spectrum who asserts that one's political stance is not a choice?
Which ones?Tell Republicans that.
Which ones?
It's mainly to make them seem less sympathetic and make discrimination against them more tolerable. Because it's (supposedly) their choice to have such feelings and desires, let alone act on those, it makes them more culpable for any abuse, contempt and ostracism they suffer from other people.
I mean if they didn't want to get thrown out by their parents, assaulted by homophobes or thrown in jail for sodomy they could just stop being gay. Right?
It isn't a strawman that Republicans (in general) are homphobes, it is a fact.
Drawing the conclusion that Homosexuality can be a choice using evidence of prison inmates makes someone a homophobe?Edited by jhunter1163:Moderated content removed.
Here's what always really blows my mind about the "gay is a choice" argument. In order for something to be a sinful choice (as the religious right contend), it has to hold some dark, forbidden appeal in the first place. Right?
You know - people are tempted to overeat dessert, because the chocolate lava cake is just so good, consequences be damned! People are tempted to do naughty drugs even though they're bad for the body, because they just feel so damn good for awhile! That kind of thing.
So the people making these "choice" arguments are implicitly saying that gay sex is as awesome as eating a dozen chocolate lava cakes and tooting a big ol' rail of cocaine - and just as deadly for the soul. So it must be resisted, no matter how hard that may seem! I wonder if they realize this.
I'm thinking the irony'd probably be lost on most of them.
I've watched them for half a century and they just keep getting worse.Drawing the conclusion that Homosexuality can be a choice using evidence of prison inmates makes someone a homophobe?Edited by jhunter1163:Moderated content removed.