Why, of course, there can be no other reason besides racism.
I guess if I can't determine the reason, there is no other choice. After all, he is black.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Being Black While Kissing Your White Wife
- Thread starter shemp
- Start date
Why, of course, there can be no other reason besides racism.
I guess if I can't determine the reason, there is no other choice. After all, he is black.
plague311
Great minds think...
Why, of course, there can be no other reason besides racism.
I guess if I can't determine the reason, there is no other choice. After all, he is black.
Thank you for literally proving my point. I couldn't have asked for a better example. You even fit a few emojis in to top it off!
Of course you don't have any evidence that he was teaching CRT. He's not a teacher, and it's not taught anywhere in the school. So we know that's out. It can't be because of the pictures, as Thermal stated they've been taken down and it's going on 2 years ago. They aren't saying it's because of job performance as they distinctly said it was a "personal matter".
So again, just post your ******* one-liner, top it off with some emojis, and prove my point a little more because seriously, you have nothing else.
Thanks.
Whatever you say, bro. Great investigative work on your part, btw. Sounds like you really got to the bottom of this whole thing. I don't need to have any evidence of CRT; the District is not claiming that is the reason for his suspension. You are making that assumption.
The important thing is that we highlight this man as a supposed victim, of course. Because, black guy.
ETA: Did I mention that this guy is black?
Last edited:
plague311
Great minds think...
Whatever you say, bro. Great investigative work on your part, btw. Sounds like you really got to the bottom of this whole thing. I don't need to have any evidence of CRT; the District is not claiming that is the reason for his suspension. You are making that assumption.
The important thing is that we highlight this man as a supposed victim, of course. Because, black guy.
ETA: Did I mention that this guy is black?
Really doubling\tripling down on it, eh? It's definitely working.
It's not investigative work, though I'm sure to some it may seem that way, it's really just deductive reasoning. I can tell I'm right because the opposing argument, which I guess is what you're trying to present, is providing no other reasoning. Just a constant need to mock the idea that it's racist. That his race can't play a factor. Now, of course, you aren't going to provide any other theories, ideas, or possibilities. Why? You have none. You'll just keep repeating this flippant mockery because you know that eventually no one wants to play chess with a pigeon, right?
Yes, I am mocking the assumption that it is racist. You have not provided any evidence that it is. It's just a convenient assumption for you and others to make. It is the general groupthink around here.
plague311
Great minds think...
Yes, yes, yes, I know. This place is just chock full of SJW's and what have you. Which, again, you haven't actually disputed anything I've said. Hell, even this is little more than an ad hom. You aren't dismissing my deductive reasoning based on any of your own. You're just dismissing it because of how we are "around here". It's the laziest, possibly most disingenuous, fallacy to make.
For the record, I'm not saying it's absolutely the reason. I'm saying the way everything is shaping up, it certainly appears to be tied to his race.
You (the general you) can't prove a negative, in your case you (you specifically) haven't even tried to prove anything, but I'd be more than interested in what other reasons there could be for his suspension. I'm sure you have one, after all, us groupthink morons here can only see racism. I'd be shocked if a freethinking, out of the box, genius like you didn't have a perfectly valid explanation. Hopefully you can dumb it down for someone like me, I ain't got the good brains.
Last edited:
"I'm not racist, I'm just a self appointed 'Too much racism' watchdog in every discussion about racism" is a weird flex, but okay.
And it's not even an original flex. It's the exact same excuse we always get.
And it's not even an original flex. It's the exact same excuse we always get.
Last edited:
I guess the only reason black people ever get suspended is over racial matters. That's using the noggin', all right. Of course, when it comes to white people, there are probably a limitless number of other possibilities.
Gee, I wonder what keeps victimhood mentality thriving? Its many supporters, of course!
plague311
Great minds think...
Your ability to form a strawman has increased! (15)
Your ability to dodge providing an answer has increased! (23)
Ooohh nice dig, I think you have it thinly veiled enough to pass muster. Good on ya. Is this all you have? Just a rinse\repeat of "it's not racist"? If so we can just stop. I'm really doing nothing more than forcing you into saying the same thing repeatedly because it's mildly entertaining for me to watch you find new ways to admit, without actually admitting, that you've got no alternative theory. I'm good when you're good.
Thermal
August Member
Doc Whitfield is calling out the board for racism, according to his own words in his FB posting, because a speaker said Whitfields name during his address (which the Board interrupted to reprimanded Clark for repeatedly during his speaking). Whitfield brought up the couple year old anniversary pics (which he hadn't previously said a peep about) in support of this.
Honestly, now. Does this sound just a little capricious, race-wise? Sounds a whole lot more like an anti-CRT battle getting red-herringed.
Dr Whitfield used his personal FB page to discuss both school matters, personal life, and CRT advocating. Seems to me if he kept school matters off the personal FB page, the board would have no issue with any of it. Reasonable or nah?
Honestly, now. Does this sound just a little capricious, race-wise? Sounds a whole lot more like an anti-CRT battle getting red-herringed.
Dr Whitfield used his personal FB page to discuss both school matters, personal life, and CRT advocating. Seems to me if he kept school matters off the personal FB page, the board would have no issue with any of it. Reasonable or nah?
plague311
Great minds think...
No, they corrected him once, according to reports. The fact is that after they corrected him, he kept calling him by his name, and no one really seemed to bother correcting him after that. Unless I missed something, I've been doing that a lot around here.
I understood that he brought it up to show a pattern of behavior, which appears to be targeting him for minute, pathetic little things just to nitpick or harass him.
Yet there's no CRT being taught in the school, let alone by the principal, who of course doesn't teach. He hasn't pushed for anything CRT related to be taught in the schools, he hasn't pressured any teachers to teach racism, etc., or at least there's absolutely no evidence of it.
So why would a man who has not done anything at all with regards to implementing, or pursuing the teachings of CRT in a school being targeted? What other possible explanation could there be that a man is being targeted for absolutely no reason at all? Anyone? Take your time. I know I'm stumped.
Absolutely Thermal, you're absolutely right. I couldn't agree more. There is absolutely no way at all that anyone, in any way, could possibly view this as racist. Thank you for clearing that up, this is obviously just one big misunderstanding and Whitfield should just shut the **** up, get fired, and learn to keep his God damned mouth shut in the future, ESPECIALLY on his facebook.
Last edited:
Sweet. You're halfway there.
Thermal
August Member
Catch up on the thread. It was just on the previous page.
The entire thread has been nothing but the same "I'm not saying racism doesn't exist, I'm just saying that racism never actually happens, and my proof is liberals are SJW cucks who who overplay the race card" from the same people who make that argument in every thread.
There, now everybody is entirely caught up on everything that matters.
There, now everybody is entirely caught up on everything that matters.
Thermal
August Member
Watch the video. I did. It was twice, and no, they didn't let him continue.
Yeah, exactly two things in this pattern: "letting" a speaker say his name, and asking him to remove arguably sexy pics on a page where he discusses school matters.
Yeah, I think the CRT postings are much ado about nothing. An evidently conservative contingent is making noise over it. So ok. They're not the only ******** bitching about CRT for no reason. The Board did nothing to support said bitching, though. A lot of posters here seem to forget that. They have to hear concerns as a formality, which they did. No other action till being publicly called out for racism by their new principal. If all Whitfield has is "letting" Clark say his name, and the anniversary pics, then I dunno. Pretty weak T.
Not what I said. Pay attention:
Keep school matters off his personal page. Done and done, and IMHO, reasonable.
plague311
Great minds think...
I think my personal favorite has been:
"You have no evidence it's based on racism"
To which I reply:
"Technically true. There's nothing solid because that's not how ******* racism works. What I can say is that it can't be due to CRT, because he doesn't teach and isn't having his teachers teach CRT? So if that's the reason "they" are upset, then it's just a screen. He took the pictures down per their request so it can't be that either. It's not his job performance or else they wouldn't have said it was a 'personal matter' (which he is steadfastly denying). Which doesn't leave us with a whole hell of a lot of other options. He's obviously being targeted as this is the 3rd thing they've tried to harass him with specifically (the Floyd stuff was brought up too), and it appears this is working."
I'm not positive it's racism, but I'm ******* trying to come up with something else and I'm left with my hands open. I've asked warp12 and he doesn't have anything at all. Just the normal one-liner quips that always seem to pop-up. Thermal has made a quasi decent argument, but it's really just based on saying "they didn't say they were racist, so it's probably not racism. It's probably just this CRT thing." Which just doesn't pass the sniff...
plague311
Great minds think...
Do you have a link? Maybe I watched the wrong video. Just a post # will work too.
Plus the complaints about George Floyd and the statements that he's teaching, wants to teach, or is pushing "CRT" in some way, but ok.
But they are doing something, he's suspended right now. If what you're saying is true then this is a crazy amount of restriction on the 1st Amendment rights of a public school principal (I'm pretty sure that, like universities they do get reasonable leeway in what they can say, due to being a government employee). Lets be honest though, there will be nothing at all that makes you see this otherwise. You aren't even being honest by including everything that's happened. Nothing will change unless you physically see one of the people involved say on video, "I can't stand black men, and he's a black man" and even then I'm there's a "but he's only one person, not the whole district" waiting on the tip of the tongue.
That's not required. That's not something he has to do. That's not a policy I've seen, and that's not what the **** this is about because that's not at all what the school is saying. If you're implying that it's about what he's posting on facebook more than racism then I'll need to see the same amount of evidence that you're requesting with regards to proving it's about racism. As of right now, I see nothing to support this and it's just another red herring in a bowl of red herrings used against this guy.
Last edited: