• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Being a racist while having a soft skull

Thermal said:
Ya or we could not act like slobbering idiots and say that both are powerfully wrong, and there is nothing to cheer about in either.

When the good guys start acting like the bad guys, but still think they are justified, they have turned a bad corner. They are falling down a slippery slope like one of those power drops at Disney.

Irs fine if you want to talk about how this guy deserved it. Just check your moral hat at the door. You have committed to being an *******.
Click to expand...

You're remonstrating with an audience that endorses political violence, on a forum that has strict rules against advocating illegal acts, but does not see fit to sanction advocating political violence, even though it's assault and illegal pretty much everywhere. Some are more equal than others and your cause is doomed.
 
theprestige said:
You're remonstrating with an audience that endorses political violence, on a forum that has strict rules against advocating illegal acts, but does not see fit to sanction advocating political violence, even though it's assault and illegal pretty much everywhere. Some are more equal than others and your cause is doomed.
Click to expand...

Jesus ******* Christ. It's like you guys are hellbent on strawmen and not understanding what's being said. How do you guys do it? Despite at least a dozen explanations to the opposite you guys keep pushing these bull **** claims. What are you gaining from it? Is this like some weird version of playing the victim by proxy? LoL. It so absurd I am completely lost at what the upside to this is because it really just looks foolish.
 
plague311 said:
Really? You're agreeing with that despite the amount of evidence showing how differently you treat situations depending on race?
Click to expand...

There is no evidence of that, whatsoever. Of course, as was mentioned, some here are playing that racism angle. Not that they are Pujols apologists or sympathizers, of course.
 
plague311 said:
Jesus ******* Christ. It's like you guys are hellbent on strawmen and not understanding what's being said. How do you guys do it? Despite at least a dozen explanations to the opposite you guys keep pushing these bull **** claims. What are you gaining from it? Is this like some weird version of playing the victim by proxy? LoL. It so absurd I am completely lost at what the upside to this is because it really just looks foolish.
Click to expand...

Please consult the thread title. Then come back and tell me how no one is glorifying the guy getting greased and glossing over the actual killing.
 
Warp12 said:
There is no evidence of that, whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Oh, is reading complicated for you? Can you not open the links that johnny posted? Let me know how I can help. It's probably more complicated than aiming a camera at someone being violated with vegetables, so I understand you might have some issues.

Warp12 said:
Of course, as was mentioned, some here are playing that racism angle.
Click to expand...

Who? Where? Links? Just kidding, you won't post anything. You'll come back with some one liner, or an emoticon of some form.

Warp12 said:
Not that they are Pujols apologists or sympathizers, of course.
Click to expand...

Has anyone agree with what Pujols did? Can you link me to posts from more than 1 person showing they condone and approve of what Pujols did?

Kidding, you can't. Don't bother.
 
Thermal said:
Please consult the thread title. Then come back and tell me how no one is glorifying the guy getting greased and glossing over the actual killing.
Click to expand...

Ok, did it. Was that it? Did that really prove your point? LoL what a ******* joke.

ETA: Also, as I've said a ******* million times, one can not condone what Pujols did, and also not be sad the old man is dead. They can both exist. They don't contradict one another. Follow me for more tips and tricks to life.
 
Last edited:
plague311 said:
Oh, is reading complicated for you? Can you not open the links that johnny posted?
Click to expand...

As I recall, he posted links to the Daunte Wright case, where I basically said he was a scumbag and his own actions ultimately led to his death. I stand by that 100%.

What he didn't link, was that I fully supported the prosecution of the cop involved, and I had no problem with the guilty verdict that was handed down.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13690903&postcount=215

What I see here, is that any time skin color can be made a factor, some do. Then, those who reject such notions are promptly labeled "racist". In this case, and plenty of others.

When minorities are involved, their apologists literally sprint from out of the woodwork.
 
Last edited:
plague311 said:
Ok, did it. Was that it? Did that really prove your point? LoL what a ******* joke.

ETA: Also, as I've said a ******* million times, one can not condone what Pujols did, and also not be sad the old man is dead. They can both exist. They don't contradict one another. Follow me for more tips and tricks to life.
Click to expand...

Yes, you keep repeating that. Yes, it still means nothing. I have tried to steer the discussion to the more obvious subject matter, that part about punching out a very old guy who poses no threat to you or anyone else, over insulting words. I think that is kind of a big deal, morality-wise. Not getting much traction tho. You seem to feel that balaboring the point about "not being sad" (that no one anywhere suggests you should) and that it deserves much repetition. You step into other exchanges and bleat this over and over, when no one is discussing them in those exchanges, either.

You're not sad about Cook dying. You do not support Pujols attacking. Got it. No one is arguing those points with you.
 
Thermal said:
Yes, you keep repeating that. Yes, it still means nothing. I have tried to steer the discussion to the more obvious subject matter, that part about punching out a very old guy who poses no threat to you or anyone else, over insulting words. I think that is kind of a big deal, morality-wise. Not getting much traction tho. You seem to feel that balaboring the point about "not being sad" (that no one anywhere suggests you should) and that it deserves much repetition. You step into other exchanges and bleat this over and over, when no one is discussing them in those exchanges, either.

You're not sad about Cook dying. You do not support Pujols attacking. Got it. No one is arguing those points with you.
Click to expand...

Read everything you just wrote about what I'm saying. Read it slowly. Now apply it to the hilited. Literally no one is arguing, or even kind of arguing, the opposite of the hilited. No one is saying it was morally right, condoning it, or anything at all even similar. That's why I keep repeating what I'm repeating. The reason it "hasn't gained much traction" is because it's a "seriously no ****" statement. No one, absolutely nobody, will argue that punching the old man was morally right.

So now what? Where do we go from there? We're talking about it. Take me in the direction you want to go with it now.
 
plague. Here you go bro. Here's a recent comment directed to me from another poster:

johnny karate said:
Plenty of forum members dance on the graves of people who died in less ignominious circumstances than this unhinged virulent racist did.

Some members of this forum have yet to see the corpse of a black man they wouldn't piss on to tell you how terrible he was and how much he deserved to die.

But for some reason, you conveniently only play the role of morality police when it suits you.

This and the fact that you go out of your way to omit important details about Cook's role in escalating the situation that lead to his death makes your schtick come across as disingenuous.
Click to expand...

You might note that said poster pulls quotes from other posters, taking a position I do not hold, and throws them at me quite openly stating that "this is why" he does not take my posts seriously.

Think about that a moment. Not my posts. Never my position, on any thread ever. But that is a character slam against me personally.

You do this too, having claimed in this thread that I support the killing of black men, which was a blatant lie I called you out on and you refused to address.
 
Thermal said:
You do this too, having claimed in this thread that I support the killing of black men, which was a blatant lie I called you out on and you refused to address.
Click to expand...

What the **** does this have to do with the thread at all? Are you just whining about personal grievances now? The reason I didn't address it is because the conversation would lead to exactly no where and had **** all to do with this thread. Much like this entire "woe is me" post.

Got anything relevant?
 
plague311 said:
What the **** does this have to do with the thread at all? Are you just whining about personal grievances now? The reason I didn't address it is because the conversation would lead to exactly no where and had **** all to do with this thread. Much like this entire "woe is me" post.

Got anything relevant?
Click to expand...

Oh, I see. You bring up a character assassination independently, and want to handwave it away as my problem when I point out that you are lying?

You can't make this **** up
 
plague311 said:
So just whining then? Awesome. Good talk.
Click to expand...

Not at all. Couldn't care less. But pointing out your blatant hypocrisy has its charm. Its interesting to challenge a poster on their lying to see how they avoid responding. Some are more artful about it than others.
 
Thermal said:
Not at all. Couldn't care less. But pointing out your blatant hypocrisy has its charm. Its interesting to challenge a poster on their lying to see how they avoid responding. Some are more artful about it than others.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

ETA: It's funny you calling me a hypocrite. As johnny pointed out, speaking of some people being more artful about covering up their bull ****, I haven't seen you argue the morality of the event in too many other threads. Oddly, it's important in this thread. Like I said, what a ******* joke.
 
Last edited:
plague311 said:
:rolleyes:

ETA: It's funny you calling me a hypocrite. As johnny pointed out, speaking of some people being more artful about covering up their bull ****, I haven't seen you argue the morality of the event in too many other threads. Oddly, it's important in this thread. Like I said, what a ******* joke.
Click to expand...

Quick rundown of recent threads then, since your memory is so weak:

-Kyle: I was one of the top posters for dozens of pages, dissecting the morality of Kyle's very presence
-Chauvin: unconscionable broad daylight murder. I opined that Lane was a lesser offender. The courts agreed, and he faced lesser charges.
-Arbery: advocated strongly that he was doing nothing wrong and his murderers were
-Guyger: another top poster arguing vehemently that she had no moral or ethical standing to fire
-Drejka: argued at length that he had no moral right at all to fire upon the man he killed

Did you have another issue in mind or are you just blowing more smoke?
 
Last edited:
theprestige said:
You're remonstrating with an audience that endorses political violence, on a forum that has strict rules against advocating illegal acts, but does not see fit to sanction advocating political violence, even though it's assault and illegal pretty much everywhere. Some are more equal than others and your cause is doomed.
Click to expand...

A conservative accusing others of endorsing political violence.

Absolutely priceless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom