Be my Stundie: February 2014 Nominations

[Bishop]

February has begun, but we seem to be missing a new Stundie nomination thread. So I made one. Insert Valentine's Day joke here.


Guidelines for what is a good Stundie nominee:

1) Posts must be funny.

2) Posts must exhibit ignorance, faulty logic or stupendous arrogance mixed with an ironic mistake.

3) No spelling errors, typos, grammar issues or math mix-ups unless they are deliciously ironic.

4) Posts should not just be something you disagree with.

5) All nominated posts must have some sort of link or screenshot to prove the reality of the post and its source.

6) Keep the introductions short and sweet as Stundies should not need too much background.

7) Nominated posts should be cut down to the nominated part which should be concise and stand on its own.

8) This is not the place for ad hominems so a post should be funny independent of knowing who it is that said it.

9) Pictures are not generally allowed on their own but descriptions of pictures, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed.

10) Videos are not allowed on their own but transcripts of videos, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed even if you personally did the transcribing.

Also, nothing from Clayton Moore is eligible for nomination. I think the consensus is that he's just so good at producing Stundie material that it's simply not fair to others to include his gems.

 

[Hans]

Also, nothing from Clayton Moore is eligible for nomination. I think the consensus is that he's just so good at producing Stundie material that it's simply not fair to others to include his gems.

Perhaps the challenge should be to find something from old CM that is intelligent, urbane and germane.

 

[Travis]

Heck I leave for a day to do 1st of the Month stuff and I get usurped!

*now gets to deflect blame*

 

[thedopefishlives]

Heck I leave for a day to do 1st of the Month stuff and I get usurped!

*now gets to deflect blame*

At least it wasn't by someone who was desperate to nominate himself for a Stundie and win it.

 

[Bishop]

Heck I leave for a day to do 1st of the Month stuff and I get usurped!

*now gets to deflect blame*

I HAVE CONQUERED YOU!

 

[Travis]

Well I guess I could do the finals early then. Instead of waiting until the middle of the month. Would people want that?

 

[Biscuit]

I would like to nominate the disclaimer from truthernews

Truther.org Legal Disclaimer
Truther.org’s stated purpose is to prevent terror attacks by drawing unwanted global attention to these terror plots prior to their fruition. State-sponsored terror alerts, warning, assertions and forecasts made by Truther.org DO NOT necessarily imply that these terror events will transpire in reality but rather that there is a distinct possibility they could theoretically occur based on the cited date. Historically, once a major false-flag terror plot is exposed (e.g., the Super Bowl XLV Nuclear Terror Plot), the terror plot is immediately canceled or postponed. State-sponsored acts of terror must have a prior paper trail in order to set-up patsies, prime scapegoats, create plausible deniability, as well as mislead the public from the true perpetrators of terror. By first identifying and then connecting the dots of the terror related paper trail, Truther.org has successfully blown the whistle on numerous terror related plots. Please spread the word in helping make terrorism a thing of the past. Blessed are the Peacemakers. Namaste

The evidence for the terror plot is that it never happens when we say it will.

link

 

[LordXenu]

Your PIN number for your ATM card is the mark of the beast:
http://www.conspirazzi.com/the-atm-and-the-mark-of-the-beast/

Tav means “Mark, sign, cross.” An X or cross was the ancient Phoenician form of the letter Tav. Ancient Rabbis called Tav “the seal of truth, god, creation”. A signature is the mark one makes that states law or truth. We sign a document with our name to indicate that it is true and binding.

The ATM uses an electronic signature or mark called a PIN (Personal Identification Number). This signature is kept in the person’s head. This fulfills prophecy.

Revelation 13:16

And he causeth all the people, small and great,
rich and poor, free and slave,
to be given a mark
in their right hands or in their foreheads,

Revelation 13:17

And that no man might buy or sell,
save he that had the mark,
or the name of the beast,
or the number of his name.

 

[Horatius]

Your PIN number for your ATM card is the mark of the beast:
http://www.conspirazzi.com/the-atm-and-the-mark-of-the-beast/

Oh, good find!

 

[LSSBB]

Your PIN number for your ATM card is the mark of the beast:
http://www.conspirazzi.com/the-atm-and-the-mark-of-the-beast/

Only if you use 0666

 

[sylvan8798]

And that no man might buy or sell,
save he that had the mark,
or the name of the beast,
or the number of his name.

Or a Discover card, American Express, VISA, or MasterCard

 

[Bishop]

This one doesn't even make any sense in context. In fact, I think the author posted it in the wrong thread:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1061975389#post1061975389

In contacting the DNA of the people on the planes to make a list of exactly who was on the planes, I found that ther are zero people to connect to.
After realizing with no peopole on the planes, they must have been drones.

I contacted the DNA of the person who piloted the drones, and immediatley mass murderer Richard Cheney appeared. I contacted the DNA of the person who shot the pentagon with a missle the same day, yup, you guessed it, Richard Cheney.

Contacting DNA? Drones? What?

 

[jaydeehess]

This one doesn't even make any sense in context. In fact, I think the author posted it in the wrong thread:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1061975389#post1061975389



Contacting DNA? Drones? What?

Channeling is my guess. If you attempt to Chanel a supposed person and cannot, then be deduction that person does not, did not, exist. The "they" in "they must be drones" would be the planes, not the people associated with the DNA samples.

Its your fault for not listening better to his inner dialogue. Its all quite clear when you know what he is thinking.

One learns something new every day though. I did not know that one of the "peopole" trained to fly drones and shoot missiles is Dick Cheney

 

[Travis]

Well who doesn't contact DNA these days? I mean @DNA is just so readable and current!

 

[Black Hole Box]

skulb at DIF replying to someone who would have preferred a scientist speak out rather than a pudgy nobody interrupting a press conference:

I`d rather listen to an honest guy with no education than all the pompous, self obsessed professors in the world as long as they think truth is irrelevant.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061976869&postcount=74

Truth movement: Listening only to uneducated people since '01.

 

[000063]

Your PIN number for your ATM card is the mark of the beast:
http://www.conspirazzi.com/the-atm-and-the-mark-of-the-beast/

I'm juggling 3 separate PINs in my head. Does that mean there are 3 separate Beasts?

 

[Bishop]

Why do people who don't understand evolution keep insisting that they do?

http://theweek.com/article/index/25...-relationship-with-science#comment-1231247966

Macro-evolution means changing from a fish to a bird. Large scale. It can't be proven, at least not until we have millions of years of recorded history which records such a change taking place. I'm skeptical that it would ever happen because it seems to contradict everything else we know about the physical world.

She's actually quite right with the last line. That would indeed contradict everything we know about the physical world. That's why scientists don't claim that it happens. And yet the irony just whooshed over her head.

 

[LSSBB]

I'm juggling 3 separate PINs in my head. Does that mean there are 3 separate Beasts?

The REAL question is how many angels are dancing on the pins.

 

[Biscuit]

When an anonymous coward hears that the American Humanist Association has set up a website, http://www.kidswithoutgod.com which has the tag line "GOOD without God," he jumps to this conclusion.

Atheists want to turn everyone into cheats and crooks.

Then they will complain because everyone is a cheat and crook.

So they will accept a NWO government to watch everyone's move.

This is what happens when you destroy a society's moral compass.

Without a moral compass, expect someone else to make decisions for you.

Atheists are the biggest enforcers of a NWO. Knowingly or unknowingly. Their "acts of freedom" only re-enforce the idea of a police state.

link

There is another funny post earlier in the thread where shoot straight johnny wonders this about the AHA,

Yet they don't start up other organisations such as KidsagaintUFOs, or KidsagainstGhosts or KidsagainstHarryPotter.

Very telling.

Humanists - fighting harry potter since 1856!

Never mind the website is kidsWITHOUTgod not kidsAGAINSTgod.

 

[turingtest]

Why do people who don't understand evolution keep insisting that they do?

http://theweek.com/article/index/25...-relationship-with-science#comment-1231247966

Originally Posted by conservativechick
Macro-evolution means changing from a fish to a bird. Large scale. It can't be proven, at least not until we have millions of years of recorded history which records such a change taking place. I'm skeptical that it would ever happen because it seems to contradict everything else we know about the physical world.

She's actually quite right with the last line. That would indeed contradict everything we know about the physical world. That's why scientists don't claim that it happens. And yet the irony just whooshed over her head.

Notice, too, the insistence that it can't be true unless we can see (and record) it happening. I'm guessing that this is another one who would proclaim "no transitional fossils!" Strictly speaking, I don't think she's demanding a "crododuck" so much as she's just claiming the massive change can't be proven unless it takes place in front of her eyes. She's setting an impossible standard for proof, then pretending that failure to meet that self-serving standard disproves evolution.