BBC 9/11: The Conspiracy Files

Aphelion said:
What??? The CBC journalists interviewed Thomas Kean and Popular Mechanics, and at the end of the show they said they had interviewed at length scientists on both sides.
Click to expand...
Impossible, there are only scientists on one side.
 
Aphelion said:
What??? The CBC journalists interviewed Thomas Kean and Popular Mechanics, and at the end of the show they said they had interviewed at length scientists on both sides.
Click to expand...

What scientists should they have interviewed from your side?

Stephen Jones? Judy Wood? Do tell.
 
stateofgrace said:
I am not angry, I stating my opinion, is that allowed? Or would you rather it be censored?

Whatever anger I do actually feel is directly solely at you and truth movement and certainly not any other member of this forum , so do yourself a favor stop avoiding the issues and start addressing them. Dancing around and avoiding issues is what you guys do best isn’t it?

Simply asking questions eh?

Incorrect you are not, you are accusing, and you are making false accusations towards anybody that disagrees with your complete nonsense.

So rather than do that, why do you not do something that no other cter has ever done, put up. Tell me what happened on 911. Got the metal to do that or prefer to play the poor victim? The poor sad pathetic victim who nobody listens to and nobody cares about, so come on put up.

What happened on 911?
Click to expand...


You have no idea what I believe.
 
Aphelion said:
What??? The CBC journalists interviewed Thomas Kean and Popular Mechanics, and at the end of the show they said they had interviewed at length scientists on both sides.
Click to expand...


...


I give up.

I had always thought that clinical death was defined by the termination of brain activity. But you have completely blown that theory out of the water.

-Gumboot
 
CptColumbo said:
I think he/she has actually answered more questions than most CTers we have seen lately. It took a few posts, but it finally came out. This exchange hasn't been perfect, but has been more productive than the usual woos (look at christophera for the extreme opposite).
Click to expand...

It is noticeable that he is trying to deflect this debate away from the inadequacies of his argument.

Whether other members feel the BBC is biased is not really relevant to this particular debate, it is completely beside the point. I personally believe they are fair and impartial broadcaster, if other people feel not, fine this is an opinion and people are entitled to it. It actually shows that we do not all think the same way and actually have differing views on other topics.

This entire thread is about the broadcasting of a documentary about 911 theories and whether the BBC were influenced in anyway by external pressure, i.e. from the UK or US Government.

If he believes this is the case then simply put up, show me the evidence that this documentary was a hit piece by the UK /US government and not just one of many well informed and well presented documentaries presented by the BBC.
 
Aphelion said:
I will if you will. You tell me what you think happened.
Click to expand...

Certainly.

Four planes were hijacked on 911 by members of a group called Al Qaeda. Two were flown into the Twin towers, which suffered massive structural damage and after being on fire for a while collapsed. During this collapse WTC 7 amongst many other buildings were damaged and caught fire. It later collapsed. NIST are investigating the exact cause. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and Flight 93 crashed after the passengers fought back.

Now over to you, just a summary please. Include the following.

The Towers.
WTC 7
Flight 77
Flight 93
Al Qaeda
NIST
 
stateofgrace said:
Now over to you, just a summary please. Include the following.

The Towers.
WTC 7
Flight 77
Flight 93
Al Qaeda
NIST
Click to expand...

Oh and Aphelion: try to include the part where the Bush regime manages to fool every structural engineer on the planet.

That one I gotta hear!
 
stateofgrace said:
Certainly.

Four planes were hijacked on 911 by members of a group called Al Qaeda. Two were flown into the Twin towers, which suffered massive structural damage and after being on fire for a while collapsed. During this collapse WTC 7 amongst many other buildings were damaged and caught fire. It later collapsed. NIST are investigating the exact cause. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and Flight 93 crashed after the passengers fought back.

Now over to you, just a summary please. Include the following.

The Towers.
WTC 7
Flight 77
Flight 93
Al Qaeda
NIST
Click to expand...

Four planes were hijacked on 911 by members of a group called Al Qaeda. Two were flown into the Twin towers, which suffered massive structural damage and after being on fire for a while collapsed. During this collapse WTC 7 amongst many other buildings were damaged and caught fire. It later collapsed. NIST are investigating the exact cause. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and Flight 93 crashed after the passengers fought back. This attack was allowed to happen by members of the intelligence community.
 
Aphelion said:
Four planes were hijacked on 911 by members of a group called Al Qaeda. Two were flown into the Twin towers, which suffered massive structural damage and after being on fire for a while collapsed. During this collapse WTC 7 amongst many other buildings were damaged and caught fire. It later collapsed. NIST are investigating the exact cause. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and Flight 93 crashed after the passengers fought back. This attack was allowed to happen by members of the intelligence community.
Click to expand...


Well at least we agree the BBC doco was factually accurate.

:)

-Gumboot
 
Aphelion said:
Four planes were hijacked on 911 by members of a group called Al Qaeda. Two were flown into the Twin towers, which suffered massive structural damage and after being on fire for a while collapsed. During this collapse WTC 7 amongst many other buildings were damaged and caught fire. It later collapsed. NIST are investigating the exact cause. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and Flight 93 crashed after the passengers fought back. This attack was allowed to happen by members of the intelligence community.
Click to expand...

Why ?
 
babazaroni said:
Actually, I sensed a little question in her voice.
Click to expand...


The presenter also made a very clear statement that the "9/11 conspiracy files will remain open for a very long time".

Which kinda doesn't sound like "case closed".

-Gumboot
 
I haven't had a chance to rewatch the CBC video (flash is being buggy within firefox 2.0) so until google fixes this problem or flash fixes the problem , I can't give my critique.

But I see that gumboot has already offered a good summary of what hte CBC video was about... and it was biased toward the CT claims without doing any amount of research into validating or debunking the claims.

that's the bias.
 
gumboot said:
The presenter also made a very clear statement that the "9/11 conspiracy files will remain open for a very long time".

Which kinda doesn't sound like "case closed".

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

hmm. and i made that point quite a whiles back.

again, showing that Aphelion doesn't have reading comprehension and also doesn't have hearing comprehension.
 
Arus808 said:
I haven't had a chance to rewatch the CBC video (flash is being buggy within firefox 2.0) so until google fixes this problem or flash fixes the problem , I can't give my critique.

But I see that gumboot has already offered a good summary of what hte CBC video was about... and it was biased toward the CT claims without doing any amount of research into validating or debunking the claims.

that's the bias.
Click to expand...

So when you claimed earlier it was biased you were just guessing?

It did loads of research. It interviewed the chief editor of the popular mechanics piece, it interviewed the chairman of the 911 commission. It offered the counter claims to every claim made by the CTs.

I conclude that you can't find any bias and so you lied earlier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom