Barry Jennings, dead at 53

It is. nano-thermite does not occur in nature.

Nano thermite would only mean that particles of what makes thermite is smaller than 1000 microns.

Even then, JONES hasn't even fully described what this "nano-thermite" is. IF it has any basis in thermite, then by its very existence, it doesn't go boomb either.

Many of the elements in thermite, in general to occur in nature.


Again, you can do nothing but lie.
 
Lie. Bentham is a well-respected scientific journal.
Lie. Bentham is a pay-to-publish fraud, and you're only lying about it because they accepted Jones' pathetic research, and they only did that because the cheque cleared.

You are just upset that Dr. Jones has been vindicated, and his paper on thermite has now been confirmed by many other expert scientists.
Lie. Jones has not been vindicated, and the only scientists to agree with him are the known twoofer frauds.

You are also upset that Barry Jennings has been vindicated, he heard explosions of thermite reactions in WTC 7.
Lie. Thermite does not go boom. Truthers only say thermite because it does everything they need it to in order to attempt to plug the massive holes in their fantasy. Also, weren't you the one a page or two ago talking about everyone except truthers disrespecting Mr. Jennings? So, why are you still twisting Mr. Jennings' statements and putting words into his mouth when he can no longer defend himself and clarify what truthers claim he said? There is no statement for Mr. Jennings to be vindicated for, there are only the lies that truthers like you have assigned to him.


You are also upset that Willie Rodriguez has been vindicated, he heard a thermite explosion just before the tower was hit.
Lie. Again, thermite does not go boom, and Mr. Rodriguez has not been vindicated.

Harrit's paper proves that the NIST report is a lie. The NIST report has not been peer reviewed, and is bogus pseudo-science, on par with alchemy, astrology, and the book of revelation.
Lie. Truther nutjobs refuse to accept the NIST report because it doesn't say "ZOMG inside jobby job!!!!111!!" and they fail to understand it, so they latch on to their pseudo-science, on par with sticking their fingers in their ears and going lalalalalalala until reality goes away.

Show me a peer reviewed scientific paper from a legitimate organization that proves that Bentham is a worthless journal as you claim.
Your statement is ridiculous. What idiot would create a scientific paper about another journal being fraudulent? Probably a truther, paying to get it published in Bentham.

If you do not have evidence for your claims, then please spare us here of them.
Right back at ya, padre.
 
Last edited:
Eigenfactor.org scores the importance of scientific journals to their community. For example
Bazant's papers were published in "Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE" , a journal with "Article Influence" score of 77.30 .

Scientific American , 79.90

Jones' "Bentham Open" journal has "No results found" out of 7,000 journals reviewed.

___________________________________________
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
 
Red paint, ... no yellow paint, blue paint or green paint.

That means the entire WTC was covertly painted red, probably during the power downs. ...
wtcside.jpg

He is right; but they did it when they built the building. It was planned in the 70s! OH noessssssssssssssss

Poor Jones is an idiot. Poor Heiwa has delusions.
 
Hmmm...looks like every square inch of the WTC's steel was laced with thermite back in the old foundry!!!!!!!

:)
 
Here ya go:



abovetopsecret.com/forum/singlehtml[/URL]


Pitiful, just pitiful. Crushing Truthers with facts and logic is like kicking cornered kittens.

________________________________________Eigenfactor.org scores the importance of scientific journals to their community. For example
Bazant's papers were published in "Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE" , a journal with "Article Influence" score of 77.30 .

Scientific American , 79.90

Jones' "Bentham Open" journal has "No results found" out of 7,000 journals reviewed.

___________________________________________
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
 
Pitiful, just pitiful. Crushing Truthers with facts and logic is like kicking cornered kittens.

________________________________________Eigenfactor.org scores the importance of scientific journals to their community. For example
Bazant's papers were published in "Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE" , a journal with "Article Influence" score of 77.30 .

Scientific American , 79.90

Jones' "Bentham Open" journal has "No results found" out of 7,000 journals reviewed.

___________________________________________
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
I assume this is the link you are referring to: http://eigenfactor.org/
(posting the link since you don't yet have enough posts for it)
 
Originally Posted by dudalb
How long until the Twoofers begin saying that Jennings was about to come forward with new information that would blow the "Official Theory" to hell, and was therefore silenced?
You know that is coming.
Here ya go:


Quote:
I mean C'MONNNNNNNNNNNNN PEOPLE????!!!!!

How blatant is this execution?!

No main news about this?

This is so in our faces, he must have really had a good case against them. I wonder who the lucky detective on this case will be? Paid off or a legit one?

Debunkers?

Z
____________________________________________
Pitiful, just pitiful. Crushing Truthers with facts and logic is like kicking cornered kittens.

(Just learning how to post these things. How do you put footnotes, partial quotes, etc.)
 
Had to think for a moment to recall this thread topic;

If I were a private investigator, And someone gave me a retainer to investigate the death of a private citizen who survived 9/11, And I found out the real reason I was retained was that this jerk thought Barry was murdered by "the government". I would return the retainer too and contact the police to stop this ass from stalking the family.
 
Last edited:
[qimg]hotobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/wtcside.jpg[/qimg]
He is right; but they did it when they built the building. It was planned in the 70s! OH noessssssssssssssss

Poor Jones is an idiot. Poor Heiwa has delusions.


That's a standard red rust-inhibiting lead (in those days) steel primer, still seen today. After erection the columns were covered directly on all sides with 1.5 to 2" of fireproofing plaster, making it impossible to thereafter coat the steel with Thermite.

Also, three of the four faces of the exterior columns lay outside the fixed windows.\


_______________________________________

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
______________________________________
 
Edited by chillzero: 
Edited for civility. Address the topic, and don't make personal attacks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doesn't NIST have samples of the debris dust also? Perhaps they need to send them to a university for examination, solely because they failed their task years ago.
 
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/wtcside.jpg[/qimg]
He is right; but they did it when they built the building. It was planned in the 70s! OH noessssssssssssssss

Poor Jones is an idiot. Poor Heiwa has delusions.

That is just rust and red steel. There is no paint. Can you produce a paint sample, or has someone just monkeyed with the tinting?
 
That is just rust and red steel. There is no paint. Can you produce a paint sample, or has someone just monkeyed with the tinting?
Why are you always wrong and off topic?

Red Steel is a first person shooter video game published by Ubisoft for Nintendo's Wii console.

Why are you research challenged?
wtcfloor.jpg

Oops, the red stuff is Tnemec 99 Red Metal Primer! Galileo you have exceeded the 911Truth expectations for lack of evidence. Do you get anything right?
 
Last edited:
That is just rust and red steel. There is no paint. Can you produce a paint sample, or has someone just monkeyed with the tinting?

From:

" FARWEST PAINT PRODUCT INFORMATION

Primers & Pre-Treatment Coatings
#1013 Red Rust Resistor Primer & Finish Coat
COLOR(S): Red.
PRODUCT TYPE: Alkyd Rust-Inhibiting Primer. (Satin Sheen)

DESCRIPTION: A high quality primer designed to provide maximum rust prevention. A combination of specially processed oils bind the rust to the metal excluding water and air which are the main cause of rust or corrosion.
Intended Use: Primer and finish coat for new or rusted metal. Used by steel fabricators and the marine industry."

Really, Galileo, you have not the slightest idea about building construction. Steel is not red, it is black.

It may be weeks after steel fabrication before steel is erected. Steel begins to rust immediately when exposed to moisture laden air. Steel primer (universally colored red) is applied to resist the rust that would prevent the sprayed and troweled fireproofing from adhering to the columns.

From NIST FAQs
" NIST researchers estimated that at least 0.13 pounds of thermite would be required to heat each pound of a steel section to approximately 700 degrees Celsius (the temperature at which steel weakens substantially). Therefore, while a thermite reaction can cut through large steel columns, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition."

A thin paint coating of Thermite would only have warmed up the steel a few degrees, and would need to have been applied during erection of the steel in the 1970s.

The four surfaces of the columns would need to have the fireproofing removed before application of this Thermite, but three of the four faces of the exterior columns were outside the enclosing windows, making this scenario impossible.

_______________________________________
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
 
Why are you always wrong and off topic?

Red Steel is a first person shooter video game published by Ubisoft for Nintendo's Wii console.

Why are you research challenged?
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/wtcfloor.jpg[/qimg]
Oops, the red stuff is Tnemec 99 Red Metal Primer! Galileo you have exceeded the 911Truth expectations for lack of evidence. Do you get anything right?

That "red steel" is 30 years old! You have to prove that there was no contamination to prove your case. After 30 years, that is impossible to do.
 
That "red steel" is 30 years old! You have to prove that there was no contamination to prove your case. After 30 years, that is impossible to do.
In 23 years you will be wrong on all 911 issues, off topic, and evidence free for 30 years.

You have some great insane posts. Keep up the anti-skeptic act here at a skeptic forum.
 
In 23 years you will be wrong on all 911 issues, off topic, and evidence free for 30 years.

You have some great insane posts. Keep up the anti-skeptic act here at a skeptic forum.

I'm a skeptic of the 9/11 Commission Report.

Are you a believer or a skeptic?
 
Last edited:
You love to place anti-intellectual posts and usually off topic.
You are not a skeptic you are a drank the kool-aid 911Truth follower (not a leader like Galileo really was) who posts dirt dumb ideas made up by 911Truth based on failed opinions, hearsay, cherry picked quotes, failed math, stupid ideas, flawed physics, junk science, lies, and delusions.

Just for you the OP from a seemingly neoNAZI white power kid who loves the dirt dumb ideas of 911Truth; you like the dirt dumb ideas too.
He was the only one to go on the record about the explosion in WTC7.
[URL="http://www.infowars.com/?p=4602"]http://www.infowars.com/?p=4602[/URL]
Opening Post,
say "hello" to the off topic poster, "Hello Galileo";
Opening Post,
say "hello" to Galileo, "Hello off topic poster".

We are off topic, and you are evidence free in your 8th year following 911 spreading delusions.
 

Back
Top Bottom