Brainster
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Messages
- 22,358
Don't know if the rest of you have noticed all the chatter about how Barack Obama is doomed to be assassinated. It's a very weird bit; about the only thing I can guess is that Obama Mania = Kennedy Mania and Kennedy was assassinated, so therefore Obama will be killed as well. A Mexican columnist hyperventilates:
As a McCain supporter, I'm pleased to see that last bit, although I note that "skin color" did not protect JFK, RFK, or George Wallace. The columnist does not seem to have a firm grasp of US political realities:
Well, that assumes that Hillary will be offered the VP slot, which seems highly unlikely.
Nor does he seem to know much US history:
JFK was shot by a leftist nut, not an ultra-conservative group. RFK was shot by a Palestinian nut, not an ultra-conservative group MLK was shot by a small-time crook, not an ultra-conservative group. Malcolm X was shot by Nation of Islam thugs, not an ultra-conservative group.
Now, you might think that with all the nuttiness of this column that it's gotten panned, right? Think again. The Moderate Voice, a (purportedly) centrist blog writes:
The topic has also appeared in the New York Times' caucus blog:
The Seattle PI blog notes a new search term popping into the Google top 100:
The Telegraph (UK) headlined:
Any thoughts about what is going on here?
The reason I fear for Obama is that despite his being an extraordinary Democratic leader and a notable promoter of change in the United States - a nation that apparently no longer wishes to greet the dawn with news of another bombing attack on a new country at the behest of George Bush - in spite of all this, and even if he manages to win his party’s nomination, goes on to beat McCain in November and becomes the next president of the United States, he could be brutally assassinated, as happened in their time to Martin Luther King and Malcolm X . There's no reason to kill a McCain - not for his skin color, nor for his political career, nor for his personal name, and it's impossible to associate him with the Muslims that arouse so much prejudice in post-Sept. 11 America …
As a McCain supporter, I'm pleased to see that last bit, although I note that "skin color" did not protect JFK, RFK, or George Wallace. The columnist does not seem to have a firm grasp of US political realities:
The U.S. Democratic Party primaries will make the final decision regarding Hillary or Obama. They will have to choose between a woman and a man of color; in both cases, there are no precedents in the political history of the United States. If Obama wins, he may lose his life … Shouldn't Hillary, just in case, accept the vice-presidential ticket?
Well, that assumes that Hillary will be offered the VP slot, which seems highly unlikely.
Nor does he seem to know much US history:
John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, among other political leaders, have sough to promote change in the United States and all four were cut down by bullets for one reason or another, because it is in the nature of certain ultra-conservative groups in the U.S. to deny the principles of equality to be established among all men - a necessary condition for a Black person to reach the United States presidency.
JFK was shot by a leftist nut, not an ultra-conservative group. RFK was shot by a Palestinian nut, not an ultra-conservative group MLK was shot by a small-time crook, not an ultra-conservative group. Malcolm X was shot by Nation of Islam thugs, not an ultra-conservative group.
Now, you might think that with all the nuttiness of this column that it's gotten panned, right? Think again. The Moderate Voice, a (purportedly) centrist blog writes:
One of the most disturbing questions that Barack Obama’s candidacy raises is this: What if he were murdered? If Barack Obama won the Democratic nomination and was gunned down before November, what effect would this have on the presidential race?
The topic has also appeared in the New York Times' caucus blog:
Today, in Dover, Francine Torge, a former John Edwards supporter, said this while introducing Mrs. Clinton: “Some people compare one of the other candidates to John F. Kennedy. But he was assassinated. And Lyndon Baines Johnson was the one who actually” passed the civil rights legislation.
The comment, an apparent reference to Senator Barack Obama, is particularly striking given documented fears among blacks that Mr. Obama will be assassinated if elected.
The Seattle PI blog notes a new search term popping into the Google top 100:
An ugly topic is capturing attention on the Internet: Today the phrase "assassinate Obama" appeared on a list of the top 100 Google search terms.
A top result is an article by the conservative Washington Times that reports a boost in presidential candidate Barack Obama's security following his win in Iowa, "amid fears over the safety of the man seeking to become America's first black president."
The Telegraph (UK) headlined:
Assassination fears follow Barack Obama
Any thoughts about what is going on here?