• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Banned by prisonplanet.com!

ref

Master Poster
ref
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
2,685
Banned by Prisonplanet.com! This is a new milestone. Earlier today I posted on their comments section the original non-edited version of the Screw Loose Change Hoax -story, captured by arus808.

Now my post has been deleted, I tried to post there again and got this:

Banned by webmaster. Your comments will not be added.

I LOVE THE TRUTH MOVEMENT, WHICH CENSORS THE TRUTH!

I guess I need another badge.
 
Oliver's not at his desk this morning (it's been chaos here since Killtown's video was released), but feel free to leave him voicemail.

:D
 
That's weird. Yesterday I posted an excerpt from the original story, with a challenge to Watson, and they left it in. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/140307smeartactics.htm

I love how the new title is "Questions abound about "9/11 Hoax?"

That's certainly true. Some questions that occur to me:

Why didn't Watson bother to send a single email to verify the story?

Why did others in the truth movement assume it was true?

What do frothing paranoiacs like Watson and Jones think when they see that rational people are laughing at them?

Was the "FDNY guilty of manslaughter" story also a hoax?

Does anyone at Prisonplanet ever sit down and say, "Hmm, we haven't gotten a single story right this month. Let's try to do better next month"?

Do any of Prisonplanet's fans ever sit down and say, "Hmm, they didn't get a single story right this month...again. Maybe there are more reliable sources of information out there."?
 
What was the difference between the original and the edited version of the hoax story? I read about this yesterday but since I don't frequent SLC and don't know who Pat is (or isn't) I really didn't understand it.
 
Originally it was reported as a straight news story, and a big one: major 9/11 debunker breaks ranks, will reveal "dishonest" debunking tactics!

Big victory for the "truth!"
 
Calcas said:
What was the difference between the original and the edited version of the hoax story? I read about this yesterday but since I don't frequent SLC and don't know who Pat is (or isn't) I really didn't understand it.
Click to expand...

Original is here:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=5956&d=1173895643

In this they rant about the case and have no doubt whatsoever.

Here is the current one:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/140307smeartactics.htm

You can compare the differences. When it turned out to be a hoax, they posted an update in their website, along which they posted their "original" story, which was actually an edited version of the original story and had numerous doubtful phrases added in it.
 
Great post Gravy. I think I can add to it too :)

Gravy said:
That's certainly true. Some questions that occur to me:

Why didn't Watson bother to send a single email to verify the story?
Click to expand...

Same goes for the EMT that allegedly heard a 20-second countdown to the destruction of WTC7. No attempt to verify or anything of the sort.

Why did others in the truth movement assume it was true?
Click to expand...
I think they are desperate. Anything that remotely bares any resemblance to being "good for the movement" will be reported on and devoured as soon as they possibly can. Quite sad really. In the end it just makes them look like completely ignorant children.

What do frothing paranoiacs like Watson and Jones think when they see that rational people are laughing at them?
Click to expand...
Anyone who laughs at Alex Jones is a member of the NWO. Saddest part about that... I think he actually believes that.

Was the "FDNY guilty of manslaughter" story also a hoax?
Click to expand...
I almost threw up when I read that. Reading your WTC7 paper managed to cool me off though. Despicable "journalism" on behalf of Alex Jones. I would love to see Alex Jones walk into a fire department in NYC and read that article aloud.

Does anyone at Prisonplanet ever sit down and say, "Hmm, we haven't gotten a single story right this month. Let's try to do better next month"?
Click to expand...
I think they do something similar. "Hmm, we haven't gotten a single story right this mont. Let's try to spin them in a way that shows that we knew all along and that government shills are trying to make us look stupid".

Do any of Prisonplanet's fans ever sit down and say, "Hmm, they didn't get a single story right this month...again. Maybe there are more reliable sources of information out there."?
Click to expand...
Anyone who reads prisonplanet and takes it seriously has to be mentally delusional beyond any capacity of rational thought. When they see that Jones says something wrong, they themselves will find a delusional way to make it seem as if he is right.

I honestly cannot see how anyone buys into articles written on a clearly bias website that appear to be written by an angry 13 year old.

Nice post Gravy.
 
ref said:
Banned by Prisonplanet.com! This is a new milestone. Earlier today I posted on their comments section the original non-edited version of the Screw Loose Change Hoax -story, captured by arus808.

Now my post has been deleted, I tried to post there again and got this:

Banned by webmaster. Your comments will not be added.

I LOVE THE TRUTH MOVEMENT, WHICH CENSORS THE TRUTH!

I guess I need another badge.
Click to expand...

Banning seems to be the way the troof movement thinks they can win a debate over the debunkers or anyone who disagrees with their theories.
 
zeppy_gorrila said:
Well, as we've all learned: The truth isn't always right the first time, but if we change the music and put some new animations it can be!
Click to expand...

Perhaps a Final Edition would do the trick.

:D ;)

However, it would still have to be changed again because it would contain errors.
 
The Demon's Head said:
Perhaps a Final Edition would do the trick.

:D ;)

However, it would still have to be changed again because it would contain errors.
Click to expand...

:D

Dylan Avery said:
I'll be the first to admit that our film definitely contained errors, it still does contain some dubious claims and does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom