NotJesus
Unsaviory
this forum need more rational conservative commentaries to balance it out. Where has Brainster been? This Whiplash guy is no good.
Brainster and BPSCG seem to be "on hiatus" since the McCain campaign started nosediving.
this forum need more rational conservative commentaries to balance it out. Where has Brainster been? This Whiplash guy is no good.
So, you've accused him of being angry and bitter because of his laugh, and that can't be challenged because you also accuse him of an unsubstantiated reputation of a problematic temper amongst peers? Gotcha. That's called bias.
John McCain's temper is well documented. He's called opponents and colleagues "****heads," "**holes" and in at least one case "a ****ing jerk."
Enlarged prostate?I've wondered that myself.
I too saw him as a bit aggresive as well. But It may simply be his mannerisms that are easily misinterpreted. He figets a bit in his seat, and it could simply be nervous energy, a busy day, too much coffee.... But the figeting comes off as aggression to those who are inclined to see it as aggresive.
Brainster and BPSCG seem to be "on hiatus" since the McCain campaign started nosediving.
I'm glad McCain was there to help her, but who was there to help McCain?
"You've got me? Who's got you?" ---Lois Lane
McCain is Superman? Hell ya, good to see you coming around Upchurch.
However, we would have also accepted:Might of been, once. Somtime during the last eight years they swapped him out for Bizarro though.
Aquaman, as he, Lois, and the helicopter pilots then plummet to their deaths.
Brainster and BPSCG seem to be "on hiatus" since the McCain campaign started nosediving.
I did watch the vid. I don't see him making any "angry" gestures or postures. Perhaps this is a case of confirmation bias?
And I have heard of McCain's temper. I have not heard any of his colleagues call it problematic. I could be wrong; I haven't looked into it much as his anger problem seems to be under control since he's been campaigning. Considering he's blanketed by reporters every waking morning, if he would have blown up, I'm sure we would have heard about it.
Noting that McCain has a reputation for a bad temper is not bias. It is fact. If you do not believe it, I suggest doing a google search on "McCain temper". You will come up with 1,120,000 hits. here are a few from the first page:
Link
Link
Here's one from 1999: Link
Link
One typical quote:
Now if you wish to argue that McCain's reputation for a bad temper is undeserved, please feel free to supply evidence. If you think that other candidates have equally bad tempers, supply evidence. If you think it is irrelevant, that is your right. But to call another poster biased for noting a well-documented fact--McCain's reputation of a bad temper--demonstrates a lack of critical thinking.
She is now. Back then, she was plain, though not ugly. She had her father's gap-toothed smile.
[qimg]http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/holiday/historicalpets3/images/1977-mistyamy-398v.jpg[/qimg]
Naw, go for it. Besides it isn't obvious to some of the dimmer people here... like me.Must. Resist. Obvious.
Noting that McCain has a reputation for a bad temper is not bias. It is fact. If you do not believe it, I suggest doing a google search on "McCain temper". You will come up with 1,120,000 hits. here are a few from the first page:
Link
Link
Here's one from 1999: Link
Link
One typical quote:
Now if you wish to argue that McCain's reputation for a bad temper is undeserved, please feel free to supply evidence. If you think that other candidates have equally bad tempers, supply evidence. If you think it is irrelevant, that is your right. But to call another poster biased for noting a well-documented fact--McCain's reputation of a bad temper--demonstrates a lack of critical thinking.
Noting that McCain has a reputation for a bad temper is not bias. It is fact. If you do not believe it, I suggest doing a google search on "McCain temper". You will come up with 1,120,000 hits.
That made me curious, so...
http://www.google.com/search?q=obama+temper
1,620,000 for obama temper
http://www.google.com/search?q=biden+temper
159,000 for biden temper
http://www.google.com/search?q=mccain+temper
1,370,000 for mccain temper
http://www.google.com/search?q=palin+temper
910,000 for palin temper
And just for a "control" of sorts...![]()
http://www.google.com/search?q="john+denver"+temper
11,200 for "john denver" temper
Must. Resist. Obvious.
Interesting. I did not know that Obama was rumored to have a temper, as he is usually criticized for being too aloof. I searched through the first few pages, found a nice photoshopped video, a couple of references to rumors, and one anecdote about a heated discussion with Lieberman. Several others discussed Obama's even temper, or contrasted him to McCain. So I guess the simple metric of google hits is not particularly valid. I stand by my point, however, that McCain has the reputation of a violent temper.
ETA: some of this may just come down to differences in the number of web pages. Obama has 209 million hits, McCain only 131 million.
Is that really how conservatives see that interview?