Attiyah's razor

Attiyah, can you even give an operational definition of what comprises an "anomaly"?

Isn't it just sort of "I know it when I see it"?
 
I recommend that Attiyah switches to shaving with vorpal razors.
Great thanks in advance.
I hope that Vorpal's razors will be siutable to shave the hair every where on the skin for both women and men. Please, Vorpal, send me yourself so as to shave according to your recommendation. It is the only practical trustable way to begin shaving with VPs.
 
Attiyah's Vorpal Blade would not go "Snicker-Snack"...

... it would just snicker ...
 
Great thanks in advance.
I hope that Vorpal's razors will be siutable to shave the hair every where on the skin for both women and men. Please, Vorpal, send me yourself so as to shave according to your recommendation. It is the only practical trustable way to begin shaving with VPs.

Troll.
 
Attiyah-formulated scientific statements are not claims. At least, they are self-proven theories.
Science doesn't work that way. You make a testable hypothesis, then you test it, then you look at the results. You're skipping the whole "science" step. This makes you a crackpot.

And what does "self-proven theories" mean? They prove themselves by their existence? Or you simply believe in them so strongly that you've blocked all of the counter-evidence from your mind?
 
Please say to Dinwar that Ibn Sīnā really disagrees to describe Attiyah as a crackpot.

I was just talking to Ibn al-Haytham and he says you are full of it.

ETA: If you are not trolling, please quote Ibn Sīnā to show where he agrees with you.
 
Last edited:
Please say to Dinwar that Ibn Sīnā really disagrees to describe Attiyah as a crackpot.
Why should I care? All of the evidence indicates that you're a crackpot. You propose ideas that contradict all known experimental evidence and laws of physics, refuse to test your ideas, insult those who don't accept them, pretty much refuse to engage in any substantive discussion about your ideas after proposing them, etc. All traits of a crackpot.

Besides, a guy who died nearly a thousand years ago is hardly a ringing endorsement. Got anyone more modern? Say, since we figured out that the Earth goes around the Sun?
 
Who the @#$% is this Atilla dude and why should I care?
Filling the gap left by Bishadi during his suspension?
ETA: I didn't realise his history, one post in '08 and then nothing more until just after Bishadi's suspension............
 
Last edited:
Filling the gap left by Bishadi during his suspension?
ETA: I didn't realise his history, one post in '08 and then nothing more until just after Bishadi's suspension............

While correlation does not equal causation, it does tend to nod, wink, and point suggestively at a good starting place for seeking out a causal connection.

(With a nod, a wink, and a suggestive pointing toward XKCD)
 
Tatyana's Law:

If you google a posters screen name, you will find they have been posting the same bizarre things over the inter net for several years.

attiyah zahdeh, you may want to try some conspiracy theory sites, for example, Alex Jones.

They will probably think you are a genius.

I did just that and you are right. Same for Bashadi.
 
I was just talking to Ibn al-Haytham and he says you are full of it.

ETA: If you are not trolling, please quote Ibn Sīnā to show where he agrees with you.

Well-played :clap:

Ibn al-Haytham is more on-topic in terms of subject matter, yet I was referring to Ibn Sīnā's insistence on evidence of efficacy when recommending a therapy. While his findings might be out-dated, his methodology continues to be the foundation for clinical trials to this day.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom