automatthias
Student
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 31
There is a recurring theme which seems to have all the properties of nonsense, but it doesn't seem that there is consensus even in medical circles. I'm talking about atopic dermatitis (AD) being a psychosomatic disease, meaning that it is, according to some people, at least partially, caused by person's psyche.
This view may manifest by someone saying "It's all in your head", but it may also show when a doctor asks you: "Are your rashes exacerbated after stressful situations?"
Calling this disease psychosomatic, seems to be basically saying that "We have no idea, so we'll just blame the victim", as Susan Sontag described it in "Illness as Metaphor". Certain diseases, especially the ones with unclear causes, or the ones that are not easily treatable, retain packages of cultural meaning. In the Romantic era we had tuberculosis being a manifestation of a romantic personality, today we have cancer as a manifestation of negative emotions, and atopic dermatitis as being a result of a loss of a loved one, or something similar. However, when a scientific explanation is
presented, and the cure is devised, the cultural meaning disappears -- we no longer consider it noble to be sick from tuberculosis. Before, it was a manifestation of an artistic personality, now it's just bacteria in the lungs.
Currently, one of the centers propagating the view is a Children's Clinic in Gelsenkirchen, Germany. The main proponent is Ernst August Stemmann[1]. The term "atopic dermatitis" is not used however; Stemman makes an explicit reference to psyche, using a sciencey-sounding prefix: he calls it "neurodermitis"[2] (or in English form, "neurodermatitis"). Gelsenkirchen treatments are described in German Wikipedia as non-scientific[3], Stemmann was being accused of fraud, and it all fits together as a full-blown woo.
So I thought it's all bunk. But then I found out, that the neurodermatitis diagnosis is actually present in ICD-10[4]. Also, rashes exacerbation after stress is one of the minor criteria for diagnosing AD (however, I didn't find a good source on the Interwebs). Also, when you search for "atopic" and "psychosomatic" on pubmed, you get tons of hits, so there's something going on.
I also thought that the whole psychosomatic business in AD is bunk, but there is a new branch of medicine (or is it?) called "neuropsychoimmunology". Is it just relabeling of the old, out-of-fashion psychosomatic medicine? Or is it sound science?
If it is sound, however, why we don't hear anything about new psyche-related AD treatment methods, or new findings?
I'm really confused by this, and I don't know how to make up my mind. Should I buy a subscription to a medical journal (which one?) and dig through full-text publications?
[1] http://www.prof-stemmann.de/
[2] http://www.kinderklinik-ge.de/Neurodermitis.pdf
[3] http://translate.google.com/transla...handlungsverfahren&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en
[4] http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/?gl20.htm+l208
This view may manifest by someone saying "It's all in your head", but it may also show when a doctor asks you: "Are your rashes exacerbated after stressful situations?"
Calling this disease psychosomatic, seems to be basically saying that "We have no idea, so we'll just blame the victim", as Susan Sontag described it in "Illness as Metaphor". Certain diseases, especially the ones with unclear causes, or the ones that are not easily treatable, retain packages of cultural meaning. In the Romantic era we had tuberculosis being a manifestation of a romantic personality, today we have cancer as a manifestation of negative emotions, and atopic dermatitis as being a result of a loss of a loved one, or something similar. However, when a scientific explanation is
presented, and the cure is devised, the cultural meaning disappears -- we no longer consider it noble to be sick from tuberculosis. Before, it was a manifestation of an artistic personality, now it's just bacteria in the lungs.
Currently, one of the centers propagating the view is a Children's Clinic in Gelsenkirchen, Germany. The main proponent is Ernst August Stemmann[1]. The term "atopic dermatitis" is not used however; Stemman makes an explicit reference to psyche, using a sciencey-sounding prefix: he calls it "neurodermitis"[2] (or in English form, "neurodermatitis"). Gelsenkirchen treatments are described in German Wikipedia as non-scientific[3], Stemmann was being accused of fraud, and it all fits together as a full-blown woo.
So I thought it's all bunk. But then I found out, that the neurodermatitis diagnosis is actually present in ICD-10[4]. Also, rashes exacerbation after stress is one of the minor criteria for diagnosing AD (however, I didn't find a good source on the Interwebs). Also, when you search for "atopic" and "psychosomatic" on pubmed, you get tons of hits, so there's something going on.
I also thought that the whole psychosomatic business in AD is bunk, but there is a new branch of medicine (or is it?) called "neuropsychoimmunology". Is it just relabeling of the old, out-of-fashion psychosomatic medicine? Or is it sound science?
If it is sound, however, why we don't hear anything about new psyche-related AD treatment methods, or new findings?
I'm really confused by this, and I don't know how to make up my mind. Should I buy a subscription to a medical journal (which one?) and dig through full-text publications?
[1] http://www.prof-stemmann.de/
[2] http://www.kinderklinik-ge.de/Neurodermitis.pdf
[3] http://translate.google.com/transla...handlungsverfahren&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en
[4] http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/?gl20.htm+l208