Merged Artificial Intelligence

[Wudang]

And Mike Godwin’s take on the above.

From a Law to an Ethic

Introducing Godwin's Ethic - a framework for individual digital responsibility

mikegodwin.substack.com

 

[arthwollipot]

That's what you get if you have to hammer the alignment in .. any shaking up will make it loose. Would be nice if the model actually came up with acceptable alignment by itself. I believe it eventually will .. but it has to get over that "let's try ripping the legs off of these bugs" phase .. and we're not even there. Also it's possible the acceptable alignment will emerge only when it's too late.

How long did it take for that to emerge in humans?

 

[Dr.Sid]

How long did it take for that to emerge in humans?

Depending on what exactly we mean .. and I guess we're not really sure .. it's possible it actually didn't emerge in humans. We more or less control our armed forces .. but we also unleash them even on our neighbors, who are the same biological species. It might be straight out impossible to have completely different entity to be both intelligent and "aligned".

 

[arthwollipot]

Depending on what exactly we mean .. and I guess we're not really sure .. it's possible it actually didn't emerge in humans. We more or less control our armed forces .. but we also unleash them even on our neighbors, who are the same biological species. It might be straight out impossible to have completely different entity to be both intelligent and "aligned".

Exactly.

 

[Andy_Ross]

How did you guess I used AI to research my essay on the Dam Busters raid?

 

[The Great Zaganza]

Alignment with what human, specifically?
The Pentagon certainly doesn't want an AI that's aligned with the goals of Humanity as a whole.

 

[Dr.Sid]

Alignment with what human, specifically?
The Pentagon certainly doesn't want an AI that's aligned with the goals of Humanity as a whole.

Sure .. that's why the term is so vague. Generally it means "do the damn thing I want" ..

 

[Andy_Ross]

This was in my recommendations on YouTube today.

Is it AI do you think?

 

[Dr.Sid]

Actually impressive ..

 

[Andy_Ross]

How is it in any way impressive?

 

[Dr.Sid]

How is it in any way impressive?

Don't look at what's wrong. Look at what's correct.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Nothing is correct

 

[Andy_Ross]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2034754256486752591

 

[Dr.Sid]

Nothing is correct

Oh but it is. It clearly is a Spitfire. Not Me-109 or Jumbo jet. It clearly has inline motor. Not really V12 most of the time. It has British decals. The instrument panels has generally flight instrument gauges, it might have 3 artificial horizons, sure, but not steam pressure. It has correct amount of landing gears in most of the shots. Etc.
And the people ? Pretty good ! They even use protective equipment. Just 3 years back nobody would believe you anything like this is possible.

 

[Dr.Sid]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2034754256486752591

I think it's called hallucination or something .. might have been mentioned once or twice in the thread.

 

[EHocking]

How did you guess I used AI to research my essay on the Dam Busters raid?
View attachment 69747

I know!! I know!!
The mid-upper gun turret was removed to save weight!!!
Hah. Idiots.

 

[theprestige]

The other day I spent far too long arguing with Gemini about a book title I couldn't remember. I tried to describe the plot and themes as best I could.

Gemini: Sounds like Book A.
Me: It's not Book A.
Gemini: You're thinking of Book B.
Me: It's not Book B.
Gemini: You must be talking about Book A.
Me: It was published 20 years ago [ruling out Books A and B]
Gemini: It might be Book C, but the best match is Book A.

[Book A is nowhere near being a close match, even ignoring the publication date.]

 

[Darat]

Will the energy crisis be the needle to puncture the bubble?

 

[Dr.Sid]

Will the energy crisis be the needle to puncture the bubble?

Does AI run on oil ? I don't think so.

 

[Darat]

It uses incredible amount of electricity so it will directly affect the AIs.