• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Artificial Intelligence Research: Supermathematics and Physics

(1) The aim is to build artificial general intelligence.

(2) Machine learning often concerns constraining algorithms with respect to biological examples.

(3) Babies are great examples of some non trivial basis for artificial general intelligence; babies are great examples of biological baseis we can use to inspire smart algorithms, especially in the aims of (1), regarding (2).

Does the above help?


I've seen this idea before, in a John Sladek novel.
 
Last edited:
I don't make sense of your statement above.
What do you mean?

Picture, if you will, a view of the ceiling above you. Glance up at it, should that be of visual aid. Now imagine the bottom of a bottle partially obstructing your view of said ceiling. For at least one poster on the forum, your postings herald the imminent onset of this view, as surely as 'betwixt' follows...well, nothing at all.
 
(1) The aim is to build artificial general intelligence.

(2) Machine learning often concerns constraining algorithms with respect to biological examples.

(3) Babies are great examples of some non trivial basis for artificial general intelligence; babies are great examples of biological baseis we can use to inspire smart algorithms, especially in the aims of (1), regarding (2).

Does the above help?

I've seen this idea before, in a John Sladek novel.

The concept is also regular in machine learning:

(1) Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People

(2) Early Visual Concept Learning with Unsupervised Deep Learning

(3) The Consciousness Prior

....
 
Picture, if you will, a view of the ceiling above you. Glance up at it, should that be of visual aid. Now imagine the bottom of a bottle partially obstructing your view of said ceiling. For at least one poster on the forum, your postings herald the imminent onset of this view, as surely as 'betwixt' follows...well, nothing at all.

Now you've lost me completely..
What is it that you are trying to say?
 
You are obviously a very silly human then, according to the godlike one.

I have it on good authority that I am a minimally capable God, because I make stuff. Inorite? Cool, or what? I'm working on Commandments and **** now.
 
I aim to improve.
What is incoherent about the sentences in question?

Well no one seems to have a clue what you're saying, for one.

"Babies are great examples of some non trivial basis for artificial general intelligence; babies are great examples of biological baseis we can use to inspire smart algorithms, especially in the aims of (1), regarding (2)."

What does that even mean?
 
Well no one seems to have a clue what you're saying, for one.

"Babies are great examples of some non trivial basis for artificial general intelligence; babies are great examples of biological baseis we can use to inspire smart algorithms, especially in the aims of (1), regarding (2)."

What does that even mean?

Recall my earlier quote:

(1) The aim is to build artificial general intelligence.

(2) Machine learning often concerns constraining algorithms with respect to biological examples.

(3) Babies are great examples of some non trivial basis for artificial general intelligence; babies are great examples of biological baseis we can use to inspire smart algorithms, especially in the aims of (1), regarding (2).

Does the above help?

Following from (1) and (2), quite literally, babies are good biological examples which can perhaps inspire the construction of artificial general intelligence.

In particular, babies are intelligent agents, and we can use babies' behaviours as a non-trivial basis (a complex working example) that we can use to inspire the construction of smarter and smarter algorithms, that start out somewhat blank (as babies essentially do) and learn over time.
 

Back
Top Bottom