• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Army Center for Military History FOIA Complete

And here are the CIT favorites....the ANC eyewitnesses.

NEIT 419 - [Name Exempt B6] Facility Manager, Arlington National Cemetery, 12/12/01, saw the faces of the passengers of Flight 77 as it flew overhead at 100 feet. (pdf file)

NEIT 420 - [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/13/01, saw the approach of the plane at Arlington Cemetery. He ran for cover because the plane was flying so low. (pdf file)

NEIT 421 - Mr. [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/13/01 [Name Exempt B6] Mr. [Name Exempt B6] - ANC. Eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. Saw fireball. Good account. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 422 - Mr. [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/12/01 [Name Exempt B6] Mr. [Name Exempt B6] was exiting a maintenance building nearest the Pentagon when he saw the plane rise up over the Navy Annex and then accelerate adn dive for the Pentagon. Dove for the ground. Observed another plane avoid the area and veer off. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 423 - Mr. [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/12/01 [Name Exempt B6] Mr. [Name Exempt B6] Arlington employee saw a second plane after hearing the first plane hit. He saw teh second plane circle away from the Pentagon. This may be the C130 sent to check out what was happening. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 426 - Mr. [Name Exempt B6] & Mr. [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/13/01 [Name Exempt B6] Impromptu interview with two Arlington Landscape managers who saw plane pass their office windows and crash. Also explained they believed 2nd aircraft to be a commuter that routinely passed over at that time. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 427 - Mr. [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/12/01 [Name Exempt B6] saw Flight 77 overhead from the motor pool in Arlington National Cemetery. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 428 - [Name Exempt B6], Arlington National Cemetery, 12/12/01, ANC employee was in the maintenance building when plane hit and as he exited he saw a second plane. (pdf file)
 
Fairfax County Police provided support in the way of traffic officers, paramedic helicopters, and assisting the FBI and FAA in retracing the flight path of the plane.

NEIT 709 - Officer [Name Exempt B6] Police Motorcycleman, Fairfax County Police, 4/15/02 [Name Exempt B6] Officer [Name Exempt B6] describes the scene at the Pentagon on 11 September. He also discusses his subsequent assignments at the Pentagon over the next two weeks and the operations of the Fairfax Motor Squad. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 710 - 2LT [Name Exempt B6], Motor Section Supervisor, Fairfax County Police, 04/15/02 (Lapic) 2LT [Name Exempt B6] describes his experiences controlling traffic and personnel outside the Pentagon on 11 September. (pdf file)

NEIT 746 and 747 - Officer(s) [Name Exempt B6] Paramedics, Fairfax County Police, 04/29/02 [Name Exempt B6] describes experiences at the Pentagon as members of the Fairfax County Police Helicopter Unit on 11 September. (mp3 audio)

NEIT 748 and 749 - [Name Exempt B6] (748), Helicopter Pilots, Fairfax County Police, 04/29/02 (Lapic) Mr. Bittner describes his flying missions at the Pentagon on 11 and 12 September for the FAA and the FBI. Describes mission with FAA official to retrace last mile of planes flight path. Officer [Name Exempt B6] (749), Helicopter Pilot, Fairfax County Police, 04/29/02 (Lapic) Officer Mountjoy describes the photo missions he flew over the Pentagon for the FBI. He provided copies of these photographs to CMH. (pdf file)
 
CIT response.

I swear, their motto should be "If at first you don't succeed, try, try cherrypick again."
 
Of course...

But I downloaded neit426 today and whoa nelly there is a quote that in there that is HUGE!

The guy works at ANC but was inside the building when the explosion happened. He gives a pretty good account of he C-130 BUT he also relays how people were confused about what had just happened and some were saying that the plane kept on going!!!!
Click to expand...

He does not mention that there is also an interview with a soldier at Ft. Myer up the road that swears the landing gear was down too. This is really HUGE! The landing gear were down on the plane! Lets not mention that almost to a man, the ANC witnesses assert (before time took its toll) the plane hit the Pentagon and not one of them (interviewed) saw the plane "keep on going".

When I made that mp3 I knew old Craig would pick up on that comment. Good to know he is still so easy.
 
"We are tripping all over ourselves"? Cherry picker appeared to miss the fact that 911Files specifically mentioned that they were CIT's ANC witnesses in his post.

ShakeyCraig is freaking delusional. Ah hell, given that the final nail in Da Twoof's coffin is in exactly two hours, I'll give him a break.

But what are they going to call us after Obama is sworn in? Government Loyalists for the Onetime Bush Engine?

Wait, that spells G.L.O.B.E., oh my gosh: NWO!
 
The guy works at ANC but was inside the building when the explosion happened. He gives a pretty good account of he C-130 BUT he also relays how people were confused about what had just happened and some were saying that the plane kept on going!!!!
Click to expand...

So is Craig's bone of contention the fact that the guy speaking was in the building and that the only aircraft he personally saw was the C-130, or is it that he is giving what amounts to heresay about others having believed that the plane had kept going?

If its the former then what's his point? Everyone agrees that a C-130 was overhead, well overhead, several hundreds of feet overhead, several hundreds of feet above the ground at all times.

If its the later then Craig is once again using the minority eyewitness report (in this case, heresay about a minority report) and claiming that it shows that the majority are wrong.
 
Have CIT ever released for public consumption all of their UNEDITED interviews with said witnesses?

Some how, I think not. Love to hear the leading questions in those interviews.

Oh, and since I know you are reading Craig, how goes the effort in providing your info to the authorities? Any impeachments on the horizon? lol.

TAM:)
 
Ranke yesterday:

But I downloaded neit426 today and whoa nelly there is a quote that in there that is HUGE!

The guy works at ANC but was inside the building when the explosion happened. He gives a pretty good account of he C-130 BUT he also relays how people were confused about what had just happened and some were saying that the plane kept on going!!!!

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread429517/pg1
Click to expand...
Ranke in October:

As they are, the transcripts and audio recordings have the names of the witnesses redacted and therefore only amount to invalid government supplied data that is certainly rather vulnerable to manipulation.

http://the911forum.freeforums.org/p...ents-army-center-of-military-history-t74.html
Click to expand...
Oh dear.
 
Last edited:
That is okay, CIT will change tune very quickly. I am converting an interview to mp3 as I write that is the death nail to the CIT fantasy. If Craig is intellectually honest in the least, he will have to close up shop. Want to place bets now?
 
911files said:
That is okay, CIT will change tune very quickly. I am converting an interview to mp3 as I write that is the death nail to the CIT fantasy. If Craig is intellectually honest in the least, he will have to close up shop. Want to place bets now?
Click to expand...

I don't take sucker bets.
 
911files said:
That is okay, CIT will change tune very quickly. I am converting an interview to mp3 as I write that is the death nail to the CIT fantasy. If Craig is intellectually honest in the least, he will have to close up shop. Want to place bets now?
Click to expand...

Bet that he won't close up shop? I bet that he won't close up shop, and I will offer double or nothing to anyone who can show that Craig or his Zaftig Pal, Mute Aldo, are intellectually honest.
 
911files said:
That is okay, CIT will change tune very quickly. I am converting an interview to mp3 as I write that is the death nail to the CIT fantasy. If Craig is intellectually honest in the least, he will have to close up shop. Want to place bets now?
Click to expand...

As long as CIT has the sanction of its victims (truthers who still believe AA77 did NOT hit the Pentagon), Ranke will keep on going.

But you may have enough to finally convince those Truthers to throw the bums out.
 
Here is what Craig and his side-kick Aldo have been searching for, the perfect fly-over eyewitness! This witness is a trained journalist with experience working aircraft accidents.

CMH Interview NEIT 596 is an interview with a Stars and Stripes reporter who was at the time of the attack headed down the A-wing corridor to get to the Metro stop. Her intent was to head over to the NTSB to follow-up with them on the WTC event. She was slowed by custodians ahead of her and was leisurely looking out the windows overlooking the Courtyard. She was at the time opposite the Corridor 3 and 4 junction point at the Courtyard. So at the time of the impact event, she was looking in the direction of the impact. She felt the explosion and secondary explosion. She saw the fireball arise from the other side of the building. Her impression at the time was that it must have been a truck bomb.

neit596location.jpg


The thing that is missing is that although she had the best view available of the sky over the Pentagon without any distractions or being subject to the “flash-bang” sleuth-of-hand tactics described by CIT/P4T, is what she did NOT see. She did not see a plane! So the perfect eyewitness who was positioned to be the star fly-over witness has let CIT down. Let's see if Craig gets as excited about this as he did the hearsay ANC witnesses.

By the way Craig, this witness is verifiable. She wrote a few articles in Stars and Stripes regarding the event and should be easy to track down by your cracker-jack investigative team. I really want you to explain to us how she could have missed a low-flying aircraft flying over the Courtyard, or turning towards the South Lot.
 
911files said:
By the way Craig, this witness is verifiable. She wrote a few articles in Stars and Stripes regarding the event and should be easy to track down by your cracker-jack investigative team. I really want you to explain to us how she could have missed a low-flying aircraft flying over the Courtyard, or turning towards the South Lot.
Click to expand...

Particularly as she mentions her name on the tape. She also "corroborates" her account in an article under her byline published 9/12/2001.
 
911files said:
Here is what Craig and his side-kick Aldo have been searching for, the perfect fly-over eyewitness! This witness is a trained journalist with experience working aircraft accidents.

CMH Interview NEIT 596 is an interview with a Stars and Stripes reporter who was at the time of the attack headed down the A-wing corridor to get to the Metro stop. Her intent was to head over to the NTSB to follow-up with them on the WTC event. She was slowed by custodians ahead of her and was leisurely looking out the windows overlooking the Courtyard. She was at the time opposite the Corridor 3 and 4 junction point at the Courtyard. So at the time of the impact event, she was looking in the direction of the impact. She felt the explosion and secondary explosion. She saw the fireball arise from the other side of the building. Her impression at the time was that it must have been a truck bomb.

[qimg]http://aal77.com/jref/neit596location.jpg[/qimg]

The thing that is missing is that although she had the best view available of the sky over the Pentagon without any distractions or being subject to the “flash-bang” sleuth-of-hand tactics described by CIT/P4T, is what she did NOT see. She did not see a plane! So the perfect eyewitness who was positioned to be the star fly-over witness has let CIT down. Let's see if Craig gets as excited about this as he did the hearsay ANC witnesses.

By the way Craig, this witness is verifiable. She wrote a few articles in Stars and Stripes regarding the event and should be easy to track down by your cracker-jack investigative team. I really want you to explain to us how she could have missed a low-flying aircraft flying over the Courtyard, or turning towards the South Lot.
Click to expand...

oooh, oooh Mr. Kotter............
[Cit] she ducked![/CiT]
ala their explanation of Sean Boger seeing the aircraft hit the building.

ETA: [CiT] she was looking at the fireball but the plane was south of that, over the other wing ( what is that the SE wing) of the Pentagon[/CiT]
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom