Are you psychic? Boundary Institute's Free GotPsi Tests

[Michel H]

My full post being:



And of course:

The rest of your post contains some pretty impressive stuff too, regarding my apparent telepathy:

... The private thoughts, which to me are as clear as the externally expressed thoughts make it crystal clear that ...

... Michel H, I can literally hear the cognitive dissonance grind in your mind. ...

Not surprisingly, you said later that this was just "sarcasm" (sic). This was not unexpected, I suppose such statements simply reflect the fact you don't want to admit I am telepathic in a serious and consistent way. You are not the only one who has behaved in this way. However, your statement that your original post was just sarcasm was not credible because it simply did not fit the definition of "sarcasm" in the English language: there was no apparent element of humor or mockery in it. So, this gives me a little idea about which of your two statements is genuine.

 

[Daylightstar]

The rest of your post contains some pretty impressive stuff too, regarding my apparent telepathy:


Not surprisingly, you said later that this was just "sarcasm" (sic). This was not unexpected, I suppose such statements simply reflect the fact you don't want to admit I am telepathic in a serious and consistent way. You are not the only one who has behaved in this way. However, your statement that your original post was just sarcasm was not credible because it simply did not fit the definition of "sarcasm" in the English language: there was no apparent element of humor or mockery in it. So, this gives me a little idea about which of your two statements is genuine.

This is not unexpected.
The mockery is clearly visible to normally healthy people:

... You want to fit and construe everything into your telepathy delusion.
...

Anyways, you're hijacking this thread. You should bring your sorry claims to your own thread.

 

[p0lka]

While the results of my first two tests on this forum were good, I think, they were not so good that I could afford analyzing them by just counting up how many answers were right, how many were wrong, and calculating percentages.

As I have explained, I had to do assess "credibilities", for each reply. For example, if someone replies: "I know for a fact that you wrote a 4", and the next person answers:" Tis is a ridiculus ******* "test", I can only use a die. I sai 3", I would assign a positive credibility rating to the first person, and a negative credibility rating to the next person. In this way, it is possible to greatly improve the results, in a reasonably objective way.

Similarly, the results of my latest tests on this forum, which provided relatively low quality evidence, needed that type of credibility analysis.

Do you see what you did there?
you assigned positive credibility to the person who answered in a way that confirmed what you are trying to prove, and you assigned a negative possibility to the person who answered in a way that didn't confirm what you are trying to prove.

end result:
you will end up with positive credibilities for everyone that agrees with you and negative credibilities for everyone who doesn't.
how is that scientific?

 

[Michel H]

...
how is that scientific?

It is scientific because the credibility ratings depend (at least in principle) only on the words that the answerer said, the general "tone" of his/her answer, but not on the number equal to 1, 2, 3 or 4 (in this example) that the person responded, as an answer to the main question "telepathy test: which number did I write?". So, in a world with no telepathy, the "naughty" answerers would get the same correct answer rate as the "nice" ones, about 25%. But this is not what was observed (the "nice" answerers seemed to be doing better), so telepathy must apparently exist.

 

[SpuriusMaximus]

Well, when I was in school, all my teachers said I was a psychic. Oh, wait, it was "psycho"

 

[EHocking]

Well, when I was in school, all my teachers said I was a psychic. Oh, wait, it was "psycho"

Well, when I was in school, one of my teachers taught psychics. Oh, wait, it was "physics"

 

[Rincewind]

Psycho Physics?

 

[sootywooty31]

I am not special in anyway as i said their are many better than me as i mentioned earlier in the thread. As for CV no i would never mention but when i was in sales for many years it helped me hunt down good areas to look with very little effort.

All the best, Paul.

 

[fagin]

Weren't you going to prove something a page back?

Still waiting...

 

[sootywooty31]

Also if the first part of string theory is correct that all is connected somehow rv could be possible, look how someone observing in the double slit experiment changes the behaviour of the particles even, and the maths seem to balance well for the first 10 dimensions involved.

I think with the final 11th dimension the maths are a bit fantastic myself, in a crude attempt to explain the BB, i have always believed in dimensions of some sort even before ST was thought of when i studied physics in the 70s, and mayb think the last dimension could of be mindons of some sort which pushed our present universe from nothing into existence as one.

Its like with our own small minds we can go around a golf course in 18 shots, but as more and more factors or elements develop the task becomes a much harder test lol!

All the best, Paul.

 

[sootywooty31]

Weren't you going to prove something a page back?

Still waiting...

I think mayb is wrong way around waiting for someone to get one 3 match even.

 

[sootywooty31]

Still must leave again now! i have left a few things to ponder.

All the best, Paul.

 

[fagin]

Also if the first part of string theory is correct that all is connected somehow rv could be possible, look how someone observing in the double slit experiment changes the behaviour of the particles even, and the maths seem to balance well for the first 10 dimensions involved.

I think with the final 11th dimension the maths are a bit fantastic myself, in a crude attempt to explain the BB, i have always believed in dimensions of some sort even before ST was thought of when i studied physics in the 70s, and mayb think the last dimension could of be mindons of some sort which pushed our present universe from nothing into existence as one.

Its like with our own small minds we can go around a golf course in 18 shots, but as more and more factors or elements develop the task becomes a much harder test lol!

All the best, Paul.

Um

I think mayb is wrong way around waiting for someone to get one 3 match even.

Er

Still must leave again now! i have left a few things to ponder.

All the best, Paul.

OK. Bye bye.

 

[Garrette]

I think string theory predates the 1970s, so I am not prepared to give credit for originality.

 

[Daylightstar]

... somehow rv could be possible, look how someone observing in the double slit experiment changes the behaviour of the particles even, ...

Except of course that no one can change the 'behavior of the particles' by 'observing in the double slit experiment'.
Forget rv.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I think that some of the posts on the top half of this page are an excellent demonstration for why you shouldn't pretend to buy into people's delusions as a joke.