tbrookin
Unregistered
T
It's hard to find good sources on the web. An article in a scientific journal would probably have more pictures, but unfortunately scientific journals are usually pricey, and for that reason don't have free web content. "Science News" is like the "Cliff's Notes" of science, so you get one picture. 
There are several sites around the world with similar features (if you read carefully, it mentions that). I would say that the article is lengthy, but the theory itself is relatively simple, and has the capability to explain the variations in these patterns. That article certainly didn't prove anything, but it seems that the geologists who investigate this phenomenon (and posess all the relevant facts) think that this theory is the best explanation.
There are several sites around the world with similar features (if you read carefully, it mentions that). I would say that the article is lengthy, but the theory itself is relatively simple, and has the capability to explain the variations in these patterns. That article certainly didn't prove anything, but it seems that the geologists who investigate this phenomenon (and posess all the relevant facts) think that this theory is the best explanation.
