He didn't say he appeared in the '60's/70's 7-up TV programme.
Why do you keep telling ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ lies all the time.
He was likely referring to a contemporary programme of the same name in his community circle. It's the name of a popular fizzy drink!!! Hardly esoteric.
Poppycock. He was documented as having claimed to have been IN THAT PROGRAM WHEN HE WAS 7 YEARS OLD. What ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ community circle do you think he was in?
He was a prolific runner.
He was a prolific liar and fantasist as well
Other marathon runners say his running claims are doable and not at all unusual.
Bull-◊◊◊◊, you're lying again
Running 600 miles in six days is a rare, elite feat in ultra-distance running that most recently made headlines due to an extraordinary
verified athletic record by Megan Eckert.
No of Arday's feats of running he claims to have accomplished have been documented.
He was a professor at Glasgow.
Stop lying. Glasgow University denied he was ever a visiting professor.
I dare say when he visited the USA he described himself as a 'visiting professor' colloquially.
Rubbish. You have no ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ idea what you are talking about. For someone who claims to have a degree (what was it again, accounting?) you sure are missing a lot of knowledge you ought to have.
"Visiting Professor" is not some casual colloquial term... It is a specific term with a specific meaning. A
Visiting Professor is a scholar, researcher, or expert from an external institution who temporarily visits a host university or college
to teach classes, deliver lectures, or conduct joint research. These roles typically span a duration of a few months up to one or two years.
He was never a visiting professor at Glasgow Univeristy Ashe claimed.
He was never a visiti g professor at the Univeristy of Ohio as he claimed.
He lied about both.
There might well have been threats made to him.
He claimed he was attacked with a knife by an intruder at Cambridge.
Why are you so desperate to believe the far-right eugenicists without an iota of evidence?
Why are you so desperate to believe the far left wokesters and DEI sycophants that this guy was squeaky clean when the evidence is clear, unequivocal and overwhelming that Arday was a prolific liar, a fraud and a serial plagiarist.
What psychological comfort do you get from this person's public takedown? What crime did he ever commit?
I get no "psycholicagal comfort" , but I worked ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ hard to earn
my degree, and it chaps my arse to see them given away like a plastic toy in a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ Corn Flakes packet to people who lied and cheated off fellow academics to get one.
But yeah, you prefer to believe anonymous haters and bots.
The reporter who investigated Arday and found his wrongdoing is not an anonymous haters or a bot.
None of the sources I have linked and/or quoted are anonymous haters or bots.