April Stundie Nominations

But gawd.. the shills with their demands for proof, is it just me or does anyone feel like slapping them.
Click to expand...

Wow. One wonders if he even stopped to read what he wrote.:boggled:
 
If this does not take the cake.

From: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=96802.0


I'm glad McCarthy is speaking out about this. I have a cousin in my family that has autism, and we realized he got one too many vaccine shots.

Wow - it wasn't that I had no idea about the NWO, but the EXTENT of their AGENDAS have been MINDBLOWING as well. I mean I had NO IDEA that spreading homosexuality through whatever means was on their plate. I always thought that it was nothing more than a birth defect, and we have to show alot of compassion toward them.
Click to expand...


I am going to go cry.
 
Spreading homosexuality through whatever means?
And here I've been doing it for toasters...
 
Disbelief said:
Good lord, I wonder if he gets upset at those who use proper English and know how to spell as well.
Click to expand...

In all fairness to the author of this nomination, CYiNCE did omit the last sentence of the post as not relevent to the Stundie but which may explain the improper English.

...los Mexicanos son Norteamericanos tambien.
Click to expand...
 
Heiwa said:
So I made a model and dropped upper part C (M = k m) on lower structure A:

Remember upper part C with mass M was previously resting on A.

Mac4.jpg


First drop was perfect - upper part C columns collapsed as expected. Lower structure A survived impact, as expected. A carries same mass M as before

Second drop was less perfect - upper part C columns just collapsed locally on one side and part C was tilting up top.

I wonder why A didn't collapse one-way? Maybe it was too strong? Stronger than C anyway.

Something for Hardfire to report?
Click to expand...

Image is integral part of nomination...
 
This one speaks for itself. And I was first to nominate! hah! :rnlaugh:

Galileo said:
It looks to me like Craig Ranke is just an honest researcher. It is not his fault the witness lied. What would you rather have Craig do, continue to use a witness that has been discredited?
Click to expand...
 
Was Hurricane Erin "faked"? Enquiring minds want to know!

hoi.polloi said:
Doesn't it make more sense that the "hurricane," if there was a hurricane or not, was documented specifically to keep flights cordoned away from New York?

Perhaps there were reports about Erin faked well in advance in order to create an 'atmosphere,' if you will, for a more controlled airspace.
Click to expand...


9/11 Truth Movement Forums.


hoi.polloi said:
QUOTE

The reason I think it would be hard to hide
a hurricane is because there are many atmospheric
gauges, etc., that are independently controlled.
Click to expand...



Using the ISO management systems, as documented and advertised (and proudly employed) at www.iso.org, it becomes increasingly clear just how much the 'independence' of 'various' sources is indeed the illusion of the banker puppetmasters.

Take, for instance, NIST and Reuters. Two very simple organizations, both with fewer employees than Siemens or 3M or even contributors to the World Wildlife Fund. Yet, both are seen as the ultimate authority on their respective specialties: science reports and reported science.

Put them together and you have an infinite paradox, controlled by a close network of people, distributing information to the various underling organizations who think they are dependent on them.

Where do you get your information? Der Speigel. Oh, well my New York Times said the same thing. Really? Wow, so did my Washington Post. d'uuhhh....

I trust this opinion piece, based on an article by Associated Press, based on an article from Reuters, based on a report from NIST, based on an order from the Pentagon.

It's not that difficult to imagine this.

I ask again: was the hurricane faked?
Click to expand...


Further along, same thread.
 
Last edited:
Wow.

It seems "teh stupid" reproduces in spring too.
 
It's sometimes a bit difficult to know which Heiwa post to nominate, but he seems to be suggesting at the moment that the tops of the twin towers are still up there.

Heiwa said:
OK, we haven't seen any buckled columns on any photos, and have we seen any downward movement of the building mass above? On all videos I see the mass above being blown apart above the buckled columns, so that the roof drops making the impression that the building mass moves down.
Click to expand...

If the building mass didn't move down, then, uh... what???

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
It's sometimes a bit difficult to know which Heiwa post to nominate, but he seems to be suggesting at the moment that the tops of the twin towers are still up there.

If the building mass didn't move down, then, uh... what???

Dave
Click to expand...


And apparently the roof isn't part of the building mass. Where exactly does the roof stop and the building begin?
 
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=151122&view=findpost&p=2829495

I believe that God is alien. That It made the Earth and then left. That It knew already what would become of it and what would happen more or less from start to finish, just as a needle is put upon a record playing on a record player. The needle will go through all the songs until the finish. There is no need for it to remain and watch over. What we dont know is the afterlife and that's were it gets interesting for people. As for the living however, they are all alone in the vast universe.
Click to expand...

Wow. I was really hoping he had full knowledge of the alien afterlife, too. Dadblastit.

Welp, I guess we can call up the people at SETI and tell them to go get real jobs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom