April 2007 Stundie Nominations

I nominate ERichardson for this exchange.

You have made the claim that the radiation in the Van Allen Belt is fatal to astronauts. Other people have put forth counter-arguments against that claim. You must either refute those counter-arguments, or you must retract your claim.

Please do one of the two.

When did I make that claim?

And the very next post...

Why must I have a qualification to tell someone that I dont agree that the Van Allen belt is non-fatal?
 
imstellar28 said:
Like I said, all properly designed building implosions fall faster than freefall. Can you refute this?

Link.


Edit: This one's ever better..

imstellar28 said:
All properly designed building implosions fall faster than gravity because they are "pulled" downward by vacuum. You don't think things can fall faster than gravity? Throw a ball into the ground.

Link.

Edit2: Imstellar is on a roll.

imstellar28 said:
Thats untrue because when you release a ball it "falls" because of the acceleration due to gravity, if you add an additional acceleration such as a rocket or give it an initial force downward its still "falling."
 
Last edited:
Roxdog insults a guy who lost his brother on 9/11:

I'm sorry you lost your brother, but the only thing that is "sad" (besides the death of your brother, of course) is your utter lack of depth and understanding. LC came on to the scene long after the news was out that 911 as we know it is a lie. Get used to it or go away and leave the grown up stuff to the grown ups.

http://www.proxyguru.net/index.php?...vd3RvcGljPTczMjcmYW1wO3ZpZXc9Z2V0bmV3cG9zdA==

Roxdog argues that his comments aren't wrong because this guy called the makers of Loose Change "a**holes". As if this guy has no right to be angry over the death of his brother and the movement of folks who are trying to make a profit off of his brother's death.
 
Roxdog insults a guy who lost his brother on 9/11:



http://www.proxyguru.net/index.php?...vd3RvcGljPTczMjcmYW1wO3ZpZXc9Z2V0bmV3cG9zdA==

Roxdog argues that his comments aren't wrong because this guy called the makers of Loose Change "a**holes". As if this guy has no right to be angry over the death of his brother and the movement of folks who are trying to make a profit off of his brother's death.

Wow, yeah I guess if this guy met Rox and cracked him in the jaw it would be proof it would be proof 9/11 was an inside job.
 
Roxdog insults a guy who lost his brother on 9/11:



http://www.proxyguru.net/index.php?...vd3RvcGljPTczMjcmYW1wO3ZpZXc9Z2V0bmV3cG9zdA==

Roxdog argues that his comments aren't wrong because this guy called the makers of Loose Change "a**holes". As if this guy has no right to be angry over the death of his brother and the movement of folks who are trying to make a profit off of his brother's death.

"I'm am (sic) normally very polite and nice until my intelligence or sanity is questioned." - Roxdog [source]
 
thehighwaymang @ LCF said:
but dylan i have one question

after you got denied from purchase film school would ever, ever in ur wildest dreams, think you would be argueably heading the 911 truth movement as it is exploding and you have the power to literally end the nwo?

dylan avery @ LCF said:

:rolleyes:
 
Most claims in LC are true. The viewer is left to ponder the significance of them and is encouraged to do further research.

How many documentaries supporting the official story encourage viewers to look into things?

Why do we fall for stuff like LC, it this a flaw we all have? Does Dylan have enough money to hire people to speak the party line? Why do people who think they are open minded progressive thinking young/old rebels fall for fraud, the very thing they oppose, so easily?

I have to include myself, why do we fall for stupid stuff? Why do we want to take the illusion and not think? LC for me was too easy to see as fluff and lies. Why do some think it is real? What did the LC believers miss? Was it typing class, football practice, track practice, flight training, calculus, chemistry, biology, physics, dynamics, statics, or just cause and effect, that day in Second Grade?
 
Last edited:
I have been carrying out some ongoing experiments for the last week or so which I would like to publish my initial results on the first one...

Experiment 1

A pebble of mass 0.25kg was placed on the ground in my back yard. On a twice daily basis the height of the pebble from the ground was observed for any changes that might indicate a change in the GPE state of the pebble. The pebble is 0.01m high so the measurement of the initial height hi was taken from its centre of mass at 0.005m high. The results to date are as follows...

Obs Height
hi 0.005m
1.2 0.005m
2.1 0.005m
2.2 0.005m
3.1 0.005m
3.2 0.005m
4.1 0.005m
4.2 0.005m
5.1 0.005m
5.2 0.005m
6.1 0.005m
6.2 0.005m

Obviously, it is early days yet but I would like to ask the more scientific on here if they could run this experiment concurrently with me. I am wondering if a pebble of much smaller mass might statistically be more likely to achieve greater than 0.005m height (from centre of mass). I may start to take temperature tests of the surface of the pebble to see if the heat energy of the sun might be affecting the experiment, any theories on that? I am also wondering if my measuring equipment might not be accurate enough to measure the change in height that would result from any spontaneous flow of GPE into the the pebble.

I nominate Experiment one as the best example of meaningful 9/11 research to date. Finally some simple observable facts that are as good as any support to date of the 9/11 truth movement conclusions, what ever they may be.
 
Quest @ LCF said:
Justice has never been served on the Columbine shooting. In fact, "false-flag shootings" are a valuable tool in the NWO's arsenal. What better way to tighten up gun laws, scare students from organizing anti-war rallies, make students look violent and provide and excuse for ever-increasing survielance?

Sad and pathetic...isn't it?
 

Back
Top Bottom