• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion - continuation thread

It seems more likely that you will return in two or three months to repeat the claim that you will, at some point in the future, present some evidence.

From supernatural sources I have at my fingertips I find that said evidence will be presented at 2:23 AM October 23, 2317 by the poster's direct male ancestor.
 
You guys need to cut him some slack. Do you know what the net latency is like from an alternative dimension's Planet X? Refreshing the page alone takes forever, let alone actually posting.
 
I will produce the proof. Stay tuned

No, we are not obliged to indulge your schedule. You've drawn the conclusion that the Apollo missions were faked. Either this conclusion is based on evidence already in your possession, such that it can be presented immediately, or it was not based on evidence and you're now contemplating going to find some with which you can backfill your predetermined belief.

Since your ongoing delay has stretched to ridiculous length, it's clear you really don't have any evidence. And it's therefore a matter of prediction that you will show up -- if at all -- with the same tired, long-debunked claims that you will deposit and then decline further to touch.
 
Of course there is only one truly rational response to all to all the moon landing deniers.

Go back to the moon and a build a big, shining, clearly visible city on the surface. Preferably the area turned to earth during a new moon. Preferably in the shape of a middle finger pointing up.
 
Of course there is only one truly rational response to all to all the moon landing deniers.

Go back to the moon and a build a big, shining, clearly visible city on the surface. Preferably the area turned to earth during a new moon. Preferably in the shape of a middle finger pointing up.

A) That would be a massive city, since not even our biggest cities on Earth can be seen from the moon

and B) You are aware that the side of the moon we see during the new moon (if you look hard enough for it during the day) is the exact same side we see during the full moon right?
 
No, we are not obliged to indulge your schedule. You've drawn the conclusion that the Apollo missions were faked. Either this conclusion is based on evidence already in your possession, such that it can be presented immediately, or it was not based on evidence and you're now contemplating going to find some with which you can backfill your predetermined belief.

Since your ongoing delay has stretched to ridiculous length, it's clear you really don't have any evidence. And it's therefore a matter of prediction that you will show up -- if at all -- with the same tired, long-debunked claims that you will deposit and then decline further to touch.

Expect a reply in a few months. After all, it has only been sixty years plus since the main event happened.

Skinny has only had two years to present the evidence he claims to have ever since he got here, yet has failed to present because reasons.

Jabba2, perhaps.
 
Expect a reply in a few months. After all, it has only been sixty years plus since the main event happened.

Skinny has only had two years to present the evidence he claims to have ever since he got here, yet has failed to present because reasons.

Jabba2, perhaps.

You posting from the future?
 
A) That would be a massive city, since not even our biggest cities on Earth can be seen from the moon

and B) You are aware that the side of the moon we see during the new moon (if you look hard enough for it during the day) is the exact same side we see during the full moon right?

a: we are humans, why not think big? Besides I thought that earth at night the cities were clearly visible from space
b: So we build it there, hence why I specified the side pointed to earth that is dark during a new moon so the lights are visible
c: hyberbole / poking fun of conspiracy theorists does not always make me make posts ment to be taken as anything other than a (maybe bad) joke.
 

Back
Top Bottom