Anyone know about the unreleased Midwest bigfoot video

[xblade]

Heard yesterday that there is a video of bigfoot taken somewhere in the Midwest that is supposed to be the most compelling bigfoot footage since the Patterson flick. It hasn't been released yet, and is currently being studied by "experts". Does anyone have any details on this video? They were keeping it hush hush on the talk show.

 

[William Parcher]

Here.

 

[xblade]

Cool. Thanks WP. Can't wait to see how this one pans out. Wonder if there will be any possum guts involved?

 

[LTC8K6]

The BFRO?

Their powder is always wet...

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

Heard yesterday that there is a video of bigfoot taken somewhere in the Midwest that is supposed to be the most compelling bigfoot footage since the Patterson flick. It hasn't been released yet, and is currently being studied by "experts". Does anyone have any details on this video? They were keeping it hush hush on the talk show.

A film studied by experts?

Probably as some believe- the "Kentucky" project et al with Bindernagel and times to coincide with this new "show".

It doesnt take a "year' to analyze anything- that should tell thinking minds something

 

[makaya325]

well longtabber, it took 2 years to peer review the findings of a new species, so its not unreasonable to suggest its possible. however, i believe, if bf exists, it exists in the remote regions of tibet, bc, himalayas, not kentucky!

 

[Skeptical Greg]

Medved said it is the most compelling piece of footage since the PG film.

Sort of like saying " The Little Mermaid " was the most compelling mermaid footage since " Splash " ...

 

[makaya325]

dio, its useless comparing mermaids, whos existence is ruled out, to the slim possibility of a large animal living on the fringes of civilization. i see where ur coming from though

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

well longtabber, it took 2 years to peer review the findings of a new species, so its not unreasonable to suggest its possible. however, i believe, if bf exists, it exists in the remote regions of tibet, bc, himalayas, not kentucky!

Thats a whole lot different than what we are talking about here- to review what they have shouldnt take much more than 30 minutes.

But that wont happen because of the shroud of secrecy that will surround all the first hand evidence from legitimate 3rd party analysis in a transparent mode.

Also, the reports as written will never be released for authentication- you will just be "told' what they said.

All information will remain secret and the location and such so nobody can go back there and validate anything. ( with NDA's, uncooperative landowners and the whole bit)

BUT, there will be something for SALE ( you can be sure of that) and Bindernagel will believe, Meldrum will confirm and Fahrenbach will preach it from the pulpit for Vanity fair in Texas next year.

This "new find" BS is always the same theme always with the same non answers leading to the same woo conclusion.

This is easier to predict than a pro wrestling match because in sports entertainment, every once in a while, Vince will throw the audience a curve ( just to keep them interested)

 

[makaya325]

well, i dont think meldrum and fahrenbach are woos nor is bindernagel. in fact, theyre the 3 who bring it to the field. i have known henner for over 2 yrs, and his info is very interesting.

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

well, i dont think meldrum and fahrenbach are woos nor is bindernagel. in fact, theyre the 3 who bring it to the field. i have known henner for over 2 yrs, and his info is very interesting.

Technically, they are worse than woos. They are pathetic examples of scientists. Their methods are crap, their deductions are the worst kind of tripe, their datasets are cherrypicked fantasy, their investigative methodologies would make the keystone Cops look like CSI and none of them have produced the first scientifically valid recognized evidence of anything.

You know Henner? Ask him about bigfoot orgies, 30 ft steps, habituation, toting goats and how he used the scientific method to validate those claims.

Then we can get to peacocks and other things.

 

[makaya325]

well i wouldnt say their worse than woos. if thats true, then daegling, radford are cherry pickers and arent good researchers, who lack in geography, zoology, paleontology

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

well i wouldnt say their worse than woos. if thats true, then daegling, radford are cherry pickers and arent good researchers, who lack in geography, zoology, paleontology

Prehaps but that doesnt alter the fact that the 3 "premier" scientists in BFdom combined equate to 3 flat tires on a 71 VW minibus with a blown engine.

 

[makaya325]

so who are good researchers?

matt crowley

katy moskowitz

bobbie short?

 

[LONGTABBER PE]

so who are good researchers?

matt crowley

katy moskowitz

bobbie short?

Define "good'

I have had no dealings with Bobbie Short but from what I've read of her work, she's right there with the 3 flat tires.

I have however had dealings ( personally and off the boards) with Mr Crowley and Mrs Strain and I would consider their work and opinions of the HIGHEST quality and professionalism and both of them have earned my personal and professional respect. ( even tho Hairy and I often find ourselves at opposite ends of the discussion)

 

[Uncayimmy]

dio, its useless comparing mermaids, whos existence is ruled out, to the slim possibility of a large animal living on the fringes of civilization. i see where ur coming from though

When did mermaids get ruled out but bigfoot beasts were left on the table? I must have missed that meeting. Can you provide a link?

 

[makaya325]

its a useless analogy. i try to avoid those to not come out as a wise guy. its kind of like insulting the subject itself. mermaids do exist, they are simply manatees, so they exist as something.

 

[Uncayimmy]

its a useless analogy. i try to avoid those to not come out as a wise guy. its kind of like insulting the subject itself. mermaids do exist, they are simply manatees, so they exist as something.

Some would argue that discussing bigfoot beasts is insulting to real science.

I dispute your contention that mermaids are really just manatees, which are slow-moving creatures that feed in shallow water. The parallel to BF is that mermaids were also invented and perpetuated by culture. Only instead of artist depictions and campfire stories we have alleged videos and websites.

If you don't want to sound like a wiseguy, I can respect that. But you're not a wiseguy because science understates BF - it's that BFers overstate their evidence.

 

[makaya325]

well, we know giganto existed, so is that proof a bigfoot-like creature did exist in the past?

 

[makaya325]

unca, bigfoot was created by the media, but sasquatch was told by native americans like my elders, and no one pays attention to that any more