Anyone interested in debunking Pandora's Box Chapter Two?

Rosetta stone

Whatever happened to the pentacon researchers edition? Anyone know?

That's my favourite example of 'truther' mentality:

We'll gather together a mass of evidence, with countless interviews with people who support our beliefs, then we'll edit it down to a user friendly version and put that on the internet.

Only the big one, the 'researchers edition' doesn't exist. We have to continue to work on it.

We have to edit to try to counter the debunking of our smoking gun version.

Oh and we have a hollywood chick lined up to do the voice over but we can't afford her until we have sold some 'smoking gun' dvds....and no one is buying.

So now we have the mythical 'pilots for truth'. The fantasists who think they have the rosetta stone which will decode the fdr and prove that the fdr claimed to be from the plane which crashed into the pentagon and is presented in support of that claim, doesn't actually show the plane crashing into the pentagon.

As ever, 'truthers' project on to others what they themselves are thinking.

Truther: The evil govt wants to round up the citizenry and put them in camps
Truther: I really want to round people up and put them in camps

Truther: The government planted faked data which contradicts their case, because they're stupid
Truther: I believe in a conspiracy so full of contradictions I feel stupid

Developing an opinion before you have seen the video might make you seem closed minded or worse--stupid like a twoofer.

Dude, watch the video. Then comment.
 
Sorry but I've watched the "video", it's just a radio interview. It's not scientific and the "evidence" is stricly hearsay from a very bias group of individuals.

Why does your movement use hearsay when the official story uses science?
 
No studity what-so-ever

I haven't, but that's because I have a standing rule stating that I do not visit CT sites. The studity typically on display at such sites causes my brain to scream in protest after only a few moments of exposure.

However, if anyone would like to list the points made by this video, I'd be happy to discuss them.

Is it the studity that causes you debunkers to be so closed minded? I watched the video and observed no studity. Give it a chance?
 
Developing an opinion before you have seen the video might make you seem closed minded or worse--stupid like a twoofer.

Dude, watch the video. Then comment.

Dude, i couldn't give a flying **** about a 'pilots for truth' video.

Don't you see? It's too late now. Maybe in 2005 or even 2006 it might have mattered. But now making videos to get your biased argument across is just pointless.

Tell me, what do the police say about pandoras chapt 2?
 
Wrong video

Sorry but I've watched the "video", it's just a radio interview. It's not scientific and the "evidence" is stricly hearsay from a very bias group of individuals.

Why does your movement use hearsay when the official story uses science?

Pandora's Box Chapter Two analyses the FDR data and animation released by the NTSB from flight 77. It's a little lower on the page.
 
Biased argument

Dude, i couldn't give a flying **** about a 'pilots for truth' video.

Don't you see? It's too late now. Maybe in 2005 or even 2006 it might have mattered. But now making videos to get your biased argument across is just pointless.

Tell me, what do the police say about pandoras chapt 2?

Why are you on this thread if you don't care about the topic? I'm beginning to think it's not just the truthers who are stupid.

You've judged the video without seeing it. Brilliant!
 
Studity

I haven't, but that's because I have a standing rule stating that I do not visit CT sites. The studity typically on display at such sites causes my brain to scream in protest after only a few moments of exposure.

However, if anyone would like to list the points made by this video, I'd be happy to discuss them.

Corsair didn't like the studity.
 
Pandora's Box Chapter Two analyses the FDR data and animation released by the NTSB from flight 77. It's a little lower on the page.

You mean that edited animation by the Pilots for 9/11 Truth based on the FDR that they found at the CRASH SITE INSIDE THE PENTAGON?

The very existence of such data is proof that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
 
Pandora's Box Chapter Two analyses the FDR data and animation released by the NTSB from flight 77. It's a little lower on the page.

Do you mean “Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two Flight Of American 77 (Trailer)”? I learned something about extremely inappropriate music, but very little else.
 
Speaking of which, that reply had nothing to do with the fact that you are using hearsay.
 
I’ve watched the “Revolution Radio” one and the Pentagon-related section of the Zembla one. Is there something else I need to see?

The video is came out about a month ago. I personally haven't paid much attention to the pentagon previously due to the lack of evidence but the video is pretty interesting. It's the first public presentation of the FDR data from flight 77.
 
Heresay

Speaking of which, that reply had nothing to do with the fact that you are using hearsay.

I am not using heresay. I just pointed out an interesting video and you watched a different one. Maybe the people who produced that video used heresay.
 
Is it the studity that causes you debunkers to be so closed minded?
I won't speak for anyone else 'round here, but stupidity does make me close-minded, yes. I don't react well to it at all, especially when it's self-evident. So this video, whatever its purported usefulness may be, has been tarred by the brush of the CT bandwagon. Not fair, perhaps, but that's life.

I watched the video and observed no studity. Give it a chance?
Because I'd rather just discuss the points it makes here. Simpler, easier, and more direct, for me at least. Why should anyone need to actually watch the video to discuss whatever issues it raises? Is there something in it which can only be seen to be understood?
 
Last edited:
Why are you on this thread if you don't care about the topic? I'm beginning to think it's not just the truthers who are stupid.

You've judged the video without seeing it. Brilliant!

Yep, really brilliant.

Just like the 'truthers' who have never read the NIST report
Or the 911 commission report

But happily claim them to be erroneous.

Frustrating aint it?

Summarise the pandora chapt 2 for me, please. Just to prove that you watched it, and understood it.

Oh, and what response did they get from the state and federal law enforcement agencies of the US, the many delegates of the UN and the worlds media when they sent this video to them to prove that 911 was an inside job? Any news on that?
 
The video is came out about a month ago. I personally haven't paid much attention to the pentagon previously due to the lack of evidence but the video is pretty interesting. It's the first public presentation of the FDR data from flight 77.

Well, yes that’s fairly interesting, but I can’t see what bearing it has on my original point.
 
The real thing

Do you mean “Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two Flight Of American 77 (Trailer)”? I learned something about extremely inappropriate music, but very little else.

I don't think it's just a trailer. Maybe the music is the studity that is bothering Corsair.

Now I see it. That's only a trailer. Here's the real thing on google:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580&q=pandora%27s+black+box

Sorry about that, and sorry about the music.
 

Back
Top Bottom