I'm not ruling out that he only uses 15% of his brain.I saw him at a local bookstore about eight years ago. He spent most of the time talking about his history, including having been told by a doctor that his powers existed because he used 15 percent of his brain, more than the 10 percent other people use.
During his brief reading, I counted 6 hits out of 26 guesses. He repeated a lot of his hits and some of his guesses were very broad ("Just had, or had in the last year").
Afterward, I asked some of the people how accurate his guesses were. Their evaluations ranged from "most of them" to "all".
I guess this is an example of observer bias. Either on their part or mine.
What do you mean by that?I decided never to see John Edward after he channeled my grandpa for a total stranger.![]()
What do you mean by that?
including having been told by a doctor that his powers existed because he used 15 percent of his brain, more than the 10 percent other people use.
He spent most of the time talking about his history, including having been told by a doctor that his powers existed because he used 15 percent of his brain, more than the 10 percent other people use.
I mean that the game John Edward plays is so generic that even my own grandpa matched some of his phony readings. The nerve of grandpa, showing up at other people's seances...he was never so dishonest when he was alive...must have lost some human decency after he croaked.What do you mean by that?
One part that I remember was that you could not discuss your experience with anyone in the media.
How would they stop someone. I mean what if you just sent an anonymous letter to the media. Assuming they would care.
I was on the John Edward show. He even had a multiple guess "hit" on me that was featured on the show. However, it was edited so that my answer to another question was edited in after one of his questions. In other words, his question and my answer were deliberately mismatched. Only a fraction of what went on in the studio was actually seen in the final 30 minute show. He was wrong about a lot and was very aggressive when somebody failed to acknowledge something he said.
Also, his "production assistants" were always around while we waited to get into the studio. They told us to keep very quiet, and they overheard a lot. I think that the whole place is bugged somehow. Also, once in the studio we had to wait around for almost two hours before the show began. Throughout that time everybody was talking about what dead relative of theirs might pop up.
Remember that all this occurred under microphones and with cameras already set up. My guess is that he was backstage listening and looking at us all and noting certain readings. When he finally appeared, he looked at the audience as if he were trying to spot people he recognized.
He also had ringers in the audience. I can tell because about fifteen people arrived in a chartered van, and once inside they did not sit together.
[FONT=Courier New, Courier, MS Sans Serif] Here is a letter sent to the JREF by an anonymous audience member.[/FONT]