Any Updates on Mark Basile's Study?

Brainster said:
Heh, I vaguely remember Professor Jones sending some of his supposedly incendiary red and grey chips to somebody else to independently test, and the guy reported back that he found them inactive, and speculated that something had happened to them in transit.

ETA: Found it. A Frédéric Henry-Couannier tested the chips and could not get them to ignite. He speculated that either they had already been ignited or that his sample had been "deactivated to prevent my independent corroboration of a crucial proof."
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Pathetic Appeal to Magic duly noted! Ferric oxide is about as stable as a compound can get and metallic aluminum is de facto stable. There is simply no way thermite can be "deactivated" by aging. But we all knew that. :rolleyes:
 
Redwood said:
:rolleyes: Pathetic Appeal to Magic duly noted! Ferric oxide is about as stable as a compound can get and metallic aluminum is de facto stable. There is simply no way thermite can be "deactivated" by aging. But we all knew that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

But this is super special highly secrete nano-therm*te, who knows what technology exists to be able to activate/deactivate it :boxedin:
 
cjnewson88 said:
But this is super special highly secrete nano-therm*te, who knows what technology exists to be able to activate/deactivate it :boxedin:
Click to expand...

Who's to say it couldn't be some secret modified therm*te?? :eek:

I heard from this one paper the military was interested in researching this kind of thing.

Thermite confirmed. Checkmate. ;)
 
DGM said:
Has anyone actually confirmed Basile actually planed to do this outside of the website produced by Rich Shaddock (ANETA.org)?

We all know that the A.N.E.T.A is an organisation of one. They claim to have raised $6000 to fund this study but, no news has been released about any progress.

I think there never was any plan to do a study. "Truthers" won't care as long as the idea that there will be a study remains. This "study" will never take place and it was never going to.
Click to expand...

Just a reminder about how predictable CT's are - the above posted here in 2014.
 
Mark F said:
Just a reminder about how predictable CT's are - the above posted here in 2014.
Click to expand...

Not sure if DGM's question from four years ago has ever been answered, but yes, Mark Basile confirmed in Juli 2013 that he was doing this project and collecting $5000 initially, $10,000 ideally, on the 9/11 Truth Teleconference, where he was a featured guest on Juli 31, 2013:
Audio-recording (Mark is on from 1:25 min to 29:33 min)
Minutes

I recognize Mark's voice and speaking style from a couple of videos, and from talking to him personally on the phone in something like early 2012 (I remember talking to him about the problem of destructive tests like DSC, and him suggesting that chips be split in half, with one half being kept for non-destructive tests and future reference, and the other half being used in destructive test. I am pretty sure we talked about a future study Basile was thinking of doing, but I am not sure that there was at the time a specific fundraising going on).
 
Oystein said:
"I recognize Mark's voice and speaking style from a couple of videos, and from talking to him personally on the phone in something like early 2012 (I remember talking to him about the problem of destructive tests like DSC, and him suggesting that chips be split in half, with one half being kept for non-destructive tests and future reference, and the other half being used in destructive test..."
Click to expand...

It is a pity that Dr. Millette refused to take that approach with his flawed red chip study.
 
Short reminder for Criteria - hee has yet to respond to this old failure of his:

Oystein said:
Criteria said:
It appears that no one here understands the subject of Raman Spectroscopy well enough to support an opinion about its value to Mark Basile’s research.
Click to expand...
I had addressed this at length in post #837.

The short version: You had created a Strawman - a fallacy, as you know.

You need to address that post. Until then, I am laughing at you.
Click to expand...
 
Oystein said:
Short reminder for Criteria - hee has yet to respond to this old failure of his:
Click to expand...

Browse Advances in Applied Spectroscopy - Concepts and Techniques c2017 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

From my research, it appears that chemist Mark Basile has decided to follow an identification methodology employed by scientists currently trying to identify the chemical formula of the amazingly durable ancient Roman concrete.
 
Last edited:
Criteria said:
Browse Advances in Applied Spectroscopy - Concepts and Techniques c2017 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

From my research, it appears that chemist Mark Basile has decided to follow an identification methodology employed by scientists currently trying to identify the chemical formula of the amazingly durable ancient Roman concrete.
Click to expand...
Drink Beer, spend money, is the methodology he employed. It take years to perfect.

Mark Basile, no clue what happened on 9/11. No steel damaged by thermite on 9/11, makes the study a delusional quest by paranoid conspiracy theorists.
 
Criteria said:
Browse Advances in Applied Spectroscopy - Concepts and Techniques c2017 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

From my research, it appears that chemist Mark Basile has decided to follow an identification methodology employed by scientists currently trying to identify the chemical formula of the amazingly durable ancient Roman concrete.
Click to expand...

And? How does any of this address anything in post #837 - which called out a crashing failure of yours? (Your post #834 failed in ignoring that the "science" of Jones, Harrit, Basile has been addressed by us many many years ago in full, and in erecting a strawman, claiming FALSELY that I "feel Mark Basile’s choice of Raman Spectroscopy has no legitimacy").

You still need to address your FAIL.
 
Criteria said:
It is a pity that Dr. Millette refused to take that approach with his flawed red chip study.
Click to expand...
Millette didn't refuse to do it. He wasn't hired to perform destructive tests, he was hired to tell whether the chips were thermite, and he did exactly that, by competent methods.

When someone asks you to do something, you can choose not to do it. That's refusing. That's, for example, what you're doing by not addressing the posts that Oystein has asked you to address: you're refusing to address them. Basile is also refusing to perform the analysis that he received donations to perform. Millette, however, did not refuse to do any destructive tests, because no one asked him to do them.
 
Last edited:
Another month gone and nothing to show for the thousands of dollars donated by gullible truthers. How sad.
 
ProBonoShill said:
Another month gone and nothing to show for the thousands of dollars donated by gullible truthers. How sad.
Click to expand...

Ziggi and Mark Basile have now been unable to fulfill their original promise (or be honest about the results of lab testing that was actually done) for 54 months.

54 MONTHS!

LOL at these fraudsters and those who would defend them. Additionally, it is now the end of the summer and so Ziggi has broken the new promise he made just this spring re providing a "major" update and results from a raman spectroscopy study of Mark Basile's sample. As the years pass by, Ziggi continues to break just as many promises as he makes and is too embarrassed to even pretend to defend himself and the fraud he and Mark Basile perpetrated re the original broken promise any longer.
 
Last edited:
Another month has passed.

It has now been 55 months since Mark Basile had the funds he needed to fulfill his original promise of sending his sample to a lab for independent analysis.

Ziggi is in hiding after blowing his promises for "major updates" this spring and summer. Basile himself hasn't been heard form directly in ages. Not even a single truther can muster any support for either of these fraudsters any more.

Ziggi, if you don't want to be called a liar, then you should try not lying so much. Ziggi Zugam is a liar and an embarrassment to truthers, if that's even possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom