Any 'pro-Palestinian' atheists here?

So you believe after 100s of years of living in diaspora, generation after generation, you still are indigenous population of that place?
Where did I say this? Re-read my post. The issue I have is the statement that those living there (that which I replied to), even if a portion of those people are simply migrant workers and/or have been situated there for no longer than when the 'First Aliyah' took place, are referred to as the indigenous people in the area in question.

Capiche?

I know Jews were from that place a long long time ago.
But meanwhile other people lived there. And it brings alot of troubles creating a nation there. and especially it is a huge exceptions for Jews being made.
No other people had so much luck to have the International community creating a nation for them.
Jews have consistently lived there. This isn't some piece of fiction from Star wars ('long long time ago'), but an actual connection, historically, to the land.

Nation building has never been trouble free. Case and point, the brunt of all Western nations.

Native Americans dont get that in the Americas, the Aborigenis dont get that in Australia, Kurds dont get that in the Middle east etc etc.
Native Americans/Aboriginals just had two of the largest nations built around them. Kurds have always received the crappy end of the deal, be they in Turkey or Iraq.

Native Americans/Aboriginals also haven't launched wars against their the Americans/Australians in order to eliminate them. The other way around though, it can be argued that this holds true.

What is left is to negotiate to terms and reparations to both sides displaced.

I dont say it should not have been done, but there must be some understanding as to why the people actually living there were not very happy with that decision.
You mean for the many groups of people that weren't happy with the wars and adjoining displacement.

Just like most in the USA would not be happy to give a huge part of the land they see as theirs to someone else and let them have an independent nation there. Same for the rest of America, same for Australia, same for Iran/Turkey/Iraq.
A huge part of their land? The 50 some odd square kilometers of land in the West Bank? This is huge? Not to forget the potential land swaps that were in peace negotiations for decades already.

Put the ridiculous size differences of the US and Australia into question. Now factor this in to the WB, the settlement blocs, land swaps and reparations and you'll see how ridiculous the correlation between Israel/Palestine and the US/Australia is.
 
I've split several posts to Abandon All Hope. Stop personalizing your arguments, please, and stick to the topic instead.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
wow, nice historical revisionism.

It is trivially obvious that we can't be looking at the same history. You being a supporter of Arafat the Rubble Rat, foreign ersatz "Palestinian", just like most of his followers.

You have your "history". I have mine.

u could get a job at the IHR. :)

How much does it pay? What are the benefits? Would I have to relocate?

Hey. Somebody might as well make some money off this ludicrous hostile fixation on one tiny little country.

Come to think of it, that's why the ludicrous fixation is being maintained. Appetites have been created. Now the appetites can be fed, for profit and/or manipulative purposes.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom