Pantaz
Muse
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 982
Yeah... and did you notice where it says "Mythbusters" and not "clinical trial"?They also completely botched placebos and controls. And a sample size of two...![]()
Yeah... and did you notice where it says "Mythbusters" and not "clinical trial"?They also completely botched placebos and controls. And a sample size of two...![]()
Just look at the horizon. Proven to be effective.
http://yearofsciencebc.ca/stories-s...ld/where-s-your-sea-legs-look-at-the-horizon/
Are you saying that looking at the horizon is proven to prevent or cure motion-sickness 100% of the time? I call nonsense on that.
If it were that simple, motion-sickness wouldn't exist. I know for a fact that it doesn't work for me.
Or that it's proven to be effective in some cases? Sure, I don't doubt that. But that's useless to the percent who aren't helped, so it's not a matter of "just" looking at the horizon to cure the problem.
Works in many, many cases.
So do lots of other things. That's quite a different claim than telling people to "just look at the horizon," as if it were the one simple solution.
Might as well say, "just wear the wristband," since it too apparently works in many, many cases.
Mythbusters tested several remedies. The only one that worked consistently was Ginger.
Always worked for me.
Has anybody tried Mary Ann?
Has there been any serious research in pressure points? Everyone knows what a light but precise strike to the solar plexus or funny bone does.
What you are saying is like saying; "Aspirin does not work for some arthritis sufferers, so you might as well wear a copper bracelet."
No, I'm not advocating the wrist band. I'm advocating precision in talking about treatments, especially in a thread about the validity of studies concerning one particular treatment. It would be non-helpful to tell arthritis sufferers "just take aspirin," as if the only reason they're still suffering from arthritis is because they're too stupid to have thought of that.
Do you have a link to actual studies about watching the horizon? I tried to follow the links in the article and couldn't find anything that actually described how the study was set up, what percentage were helped, whether it was double blind, and so forth.
But pressure points that are erogenous in a platonic way (think of shiatzu head and neck massage), doesn't they release endorphines?There are plenty of spots that can damage or hurt people if you whack them hard enough. Hitting the spots you mentioined, the carotid artery, the philtrum, the optical nerve, or the male beanbag have all been researched and proven to be "pressure points" in various martial arts...
...but as far as scientific research showing that pressure points heal or fix something, not so much.
The root of the problem seems to be that the ears tell you you are moving, but your eyes tell you you are not. The brain says "we are betting different inputs, we must be poisoned, Vomit! NOW!"
So, in a boat. looking at the horizon lets your eyes see the same motion that your ears sense.
In an airplane things are usually reversed- your ears sense no motion, but your eyes do see the plane flying, the land moving. Looking out the window make it worse, you need to look into the airplane. Synch your senses.