volatile
Scholar and a Gentleman
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 6,729
I think the loophole is that the Shabaz Goy is someone outside of the home.
So... pizza delivery is kosher? Is that right?
I think the loophole is that the Shabaz Goy is someone outside of the home.
So... pizza delivery is kosher? Is that right?
With all do respect to Judaism, isn't this one of those really absurd beliefs right up there with burying a saint's statue in your yard for good luck?
On a slightly more serious note, what is the supposed penalty if one doesn't follow these rules about not using lifts, etc?
These are all man made superstitions, justified by years of repetition for no good reason. Someone might as well say, do not walk under a ladder or it will damn you to eternal torment. Using a lift on the 'Sabbath' is superstition running riot.
It's this kind of stuff that convinced the young Sledge many years ago that religion is rubbish. God created the whole universe and everything in it, but will be angry if you operate a light switch on a certain day? Bulldust. How egotistical would you have to be to honestly believe a supereme being would care about you turning a light on?
Keeping a fire going all night and all day on the off chance you want hot water tomorrow afternoon takes a lot of firewood and is therefore expensive.
So... pizza delivery is kosher? Is that right?
This makes sense, the problem is when they try to get around the difficulties imposed by their own rules by looking for legalistic shortcuts that I find it strange.
Either accept that you are doing something to make your life difficult or don't do it. Trying to work around the difficulty is what I just do not understand.
Well at this point rule lawyering is basicaly part of judaism to the point where not doing it would be rather unusal (for an extreme example see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv ).
This makes sense, the problem is when they try to get around the difficulties imposed by their own rules by looking for legalistic shortcuts that I find it strange.
Either accept that you are doing something to make your life difficult or don't do it. Trying to work around the difficulty is what I just do not understand.
Of course do any of them deliver on the sabbath?
I think that the proper blessings have to be made, which basically makes it impossible for a non-Jew to prepare kosher food, but I could be wrong about that.
So apparently, I live in an Eruv.
You learn something every day.
Not aware of that being a requirment and the amount of stuff marked kosher in the average supermarket would require rather a large percentage of the jewish population to be working in the food preperation industry if that was the case.
Incidentally, how would such Jews call the lift to descend, or would they simply wait for some non-Jew on a higher floor to call it?
Bad news if you're a Jew living on the top floor.
This article touches on rules of the sabbath and whether use of an elevator that stops on every floor violates the sabbath for observant Jews.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/nyregion/10elevator.html?ref=middleeast
With all do respect to Judaism, isn't this one of those really absurd beliefs right up there with burying a saint's statue in your yard for good luck?
So one could knit on an already-in-progress sock, but could not cast on a new sock or bind off a finished one? [/knitter]Generally, observant Jews are forbidden from creating new things, or transforming an existing thing into its final form, on the sabbath.
There's a scene in one of Chaim Potok's novels where the non-observant hero, a psychologist, is visiting his extremely Orthodox father over the Sabbath. During the visit he gets a message that one of his patients needs immediate attention (he may have attempted suicide). The hero's father is strictly forbidden from using the telephone or handling money on the Sabbath -- but as soon as he hears about this patient, he at once telephones for a taxi and gives his son money to pay for it.Saving life supercedes all the sabbath rules, so presumably they had a different line for emergencies.
That's why McDonald's has the Filet-o-Fish sandwich: back when the menu was limited to burgers, fries, shakes, soft drinks and coffee, sales in heavily Catholic communities were dropping off drastically on Fridays. (This is the incident that also demonstrates that Ray Kroc was a decent marketer but an idiot when it came to food: instead of "smelly" fish, he wanted to extend the menu to include a meatfree, Friday-safe "Hula Burger" -- a ring of canned pineapple, grilled, topped with cheese, and served on a bun. It was not a rip-roaring success.)A very good example. It may not be mandatory, but it's still "culturally enforced" (at least around here) -- every restaurant within a hundred miles of here seems to do clam chowder as the Friday soup-of-the-day and the special is always a fish sandwich or something. You can't walk in to a restaurant without being forcibly reminded that God really wants you to eat fish today.
Unlike religion per se!Using a model of religion derived from Christianity to understand other religions tends to produce misunderstandings.
Correct. Please do respect due respect!By the way, the phrase is "due respect," not "do respect." ("Due" = "owed.")
Yes - that makes sense!The justification as I understand it is that by doing the activities to get around the rules you are thinking about and showing respect for the rules.

Yes - find the loopholes in the law (but only the "true, legitimate" loopholes, not those hypocritical other types, mind) - that's the spirit - there's a good Jew!Which lawyer would you say knows the law better? The guy who looks at the straightforward answer and declares it is illegal, or the guy who finds the loophole that makes it legal? I think the loophole finder would be the better lawyer, right? Assuming that it is a true, legitimate, loophole, not some sort of wishful thinking or "you won't get caught" sort of loophole, but more like the "using clause 218b of the tax reform act of 1975, ....." sort of loophole.
All this "working around the difficulty" is part of knowing and understanding the law. It demonstrates your understanding of Torah, and proves you are a good Jew.
So this is why the Kama Sutra was written, and which, no doubt, translates across all religions!If you do something every normal day, either don't do it on the sabbath, or do it differently.
When did the grass start growing?!The other prohibition against "work" is based on the fact that God took 6 days to create the universe, but rested on the seventh. Now, the most misunderstood element of the sabbath prohibitions, as practiced in Judaism, is the idea that one ought to refrain from "work", in honor of God's day of rest. That's a misunderstanding, and maybe a mistranslation. The prohibited actions are not "work", but rather "creation". God spent six days creating and shaping and forming the world, but on the seventh day did no creation.
Yes - I can see the sense in that. Turning on an automatic washing machine (as opposed to doing the laundry by hand!) and sitting round a camp fire are pretty analogous!When one lights a match, one creates a fire. Creating a fire is something that is forbidden on the sabbath, because of the "creating" part. When electricity came along, they decided that completing an electric circuit was a lot like creating a fire, and so it was forbidden.
There's the rub. I don't see what all the fuss is about. Automate everything - how lazy can one get?!And this was inconvenient, but workable, so long as electrical devices were the sorts of things that were either "on" or "off" and had a switch that a person activated to make them do something. Here in the modern world, we have more and more things that activate automatically. They have some sensor that is always working, but when it detects something, it does some work, all without human intervention. Once again, the rabbits have to figure out what to do.
I can think of a much better example, but I wouldn't wish to degrade the thread. Suffice to say it would require much staying power!So one could knit on an already-in-progress sock, but could not cast on a new sock or bind off a finished one? [/knitter]
Unlike the MacArabia here in the Middle East. A resounding winner - even with me!(This is the incident that also demonstrates that Ray Kroc was a decent marketer but an idiot when it came to food: instead of "smelly" fish, he wanted to extend the menu to include a meatfree, Friday-safe "Hula Burger" -- a ring of canned pineapple, grilled, topped with cheese, and served on a bun. It was not a rip-roaring success.)
...snip...
All this "working around the difficulty" is part of knowing and understanding the law. It demonstrates your understanding of Torah, and proves you are a good Jew.
So long as no ham or bacon, or improper ingredients are on it, I think it might fit.
Well at this point rule lawyering is basicaly part of judaism to the point where not doing it would be rather unusal (for an extreme example see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv ).
There is also a tradition of jewish jokes that play with such rule lawyering:
So one could knit on an already-in-progress sock, but could not cast on a new sock or bind off a finished one? [/knitter]