• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

You are accusing unnamed parties. Not unlike a "John Doe" lawsuit, whereby the defendant's name is not known until warrants are executed, etc. Don't play the martyr, no one is buying it.

So I am not accusing people. Glad we got that cleared up.

Please stop misrepresenting me.
 
The paper is in you sig. I am not quoting a paper you wrote.
Okay, so that's three lies on two pages.

Remember this, from last night?
I refuse to even discuss eyewitness accounts with people that just cherry pick the ones that support them.
Remember me asking you again and again for your quotes that contradict mine, and you failing to produce them?

That's because you lied.

So what's going on, Docker? Why can't, or why won't, you stop lying?
 
So I am not accusing people. Glad we got that cleared up.

Please stop misrepresenting me.
Then you agree that Chief Daniel Nigro was telling the truth about building 7 and about his order to withdraw from it?
 
Then you agree that Chief Daniel Nigro was telling the truth about building 7 and about his order to withdraw from it?

Yes I see no reason for him to lie, but that doesn't prove blasts weren't involved.

Why did you claim Jones is "deliberately" misrepresenting the events of 9/11? You can't know this. Prove it or it's libel.
 
I don't know. Thats why i'm waiting for the final report. Although I welcome their decision to examine blast scenarios.
The NIST port isn't about Nigro's statement. I ask you again: do you agree that he was telling the truth?
 
The NIST port isn't about Nigro's statement. I ask you again: do you agree that he was telling the truth?

Yes I agree, I don't think any fireman would be involved in blowing up buildings. I think the death of those brave firemen was the saddest part about 9/11.
 
Why did you claim Jones is "deliberately" misrepresenting the events of 9/11? You can't know this. Prove it or it's libel.
“See, guys, this is all ‘straw man.’ We never said the firemen were involved. He just claimed we said it. He’s a liar! That’s what liars do. They build straw men.”

“Just like you heard it: he claimed we blamed the firemen. We never said that. He just made it up.”

“He blamed us for saying the firefighters were in on it.”

“He’s claiming I blame firefighters. ...And none of it’s true.”

“He set the subject, he made up that we blame the firefighters.”
Alex Jones’ PrisonPlanet.com: Silverstein, FDNY Decided to “Pull WTC 7”

Alex Jones' infowars.com: “World Trade Center 7 Imploded by Silverstein, FDNY And Others”
 
Gravy how dare you say that Jones deliberately misled when he produced the slide showing building 7?
 
Alex Jones’ PrisonPlanet.com: Silverstein, FDNY Decided to “Pull WTC 7”

Alex Jones' infowars.com: “World Trade Center 7 Imploded by Silverstein, FDNY And Others”

I agree, Jones is wrong to even mention the FDNY.
 
Yes I agree, I don't think any fireman would be involved in blowing up buildings. I think the death of those brave firemen was the saddest part about 9/11.
Maybe Alex Jones isn't the guy you want as your avatar, then, even in jest.
 
Gravy how dare you say that Jones deliberately misled when he produced the slide showing building 7?
didnt you just get done calling gravy a liar for commenting on WTC7 before the NIST report was completed? so what does that make jones?
 
Gravy how dare you say that Jones deliberately misled when he produced the slide showing building 7?
Steven Jones deliberately misled about building 7 several times. Which slide do you mean: the one where he said the photo was taken from near the north tower in the afternoon, or the one from the north side that represented 7's "small fires?"
 
Steven Jones deliberately misled about building 7 several times. Which slide do you mean?

The slide where he shows 7 earlier in the day with little smoke. He gave that lecture a while ago, you cannot say it was deliberate.
 

Back
Top Bottom