• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Please stop side stepping. Gravy is writing papers saying 7 fell due to damage and fire, even though he is not an engineer and NIST have not concluded their inquiry.
they have on buildings 1 & 2. Only 7 is stull under investigation. Gravy is using the info from the report on 1 & 2 which says damage and fire.
 
You even lie about lying. Pathetic.

Your OKC thread awaits, Docker. Have at it, with all your evidence.

Answer my question gravy. Why are you writing papers saying 7 fell due to fire and damage, and telling people this, when NIST have not concluded their final report on it?

I await an answer
 
Please stop side stepping. Gravy is writing papers saying 7 fell due to damage and fire, even though he is not an engineer and NIST have not concluded their inquiry.
does it matter? does gravy ever claim to be a structural engineer? is there some problem with looking at evidence and drawing conclusions? if a structural engineer came along and said gravy was wrong, do you think gravy woudl clal the engineer a liar?
 
does it matter? does gravy ever claim to be a structural engineer? is there some problem with looking at evidence and drawing conclusions? if a structural engineer came along and said gravy was wrong, do you think gravy woudl clal the engineer a liar?

Gravy has no right to pre-empt a scientific investigation and present those findings as fact. He is not a scientist (as far as I know)
 
I have written no papers nor have I reached conclusions. I'm doing what gravy should be doing. Waiting for the experts to conclude.
Incidentally, OKC was not a single truck bomb.
Another lie? This is wild, wild stuff! Are you a pathological liar, Docker? What is going on?
 
I have written no papers nor have I reached conclusions. I'm doing what gravy should be doing. Waiting for the experts to conclude.

No, you are posting vague accusations on a message board. You lack of application of scientific process, and transparency of actions speak very loudly of your intent.
 
Gravy has no right to pre-empt a scientific investigation and present those findings as fact. He is not a scientist (as far as I know)

He is preempting nothing
Main Entry: pre·empt
Pronunciation: prE-'em(p)t
Function: verb
Etymology: back-formation from preemption
transitive verb
1 : to acquire (as land) by preemption
2 : to seize upon to the exclusion of others : take for oneself <the movement was then preempted by a lunatic fringe>
3 : to replace with something considered to be of greater value or priority : take precedence over <the program did not appear, having been preempted by a baseball game -- Robert MacNeil>
4 : to gain a commanding or preeminent place in
5 : to prevent from happening or taking place : FORESTALL, PRECLUDE
 
Name a person I have accused. Give me their name. I am waiting.

You are accusing unnamed parties. Not unlike a "John Doe" lawsuit, whereby the defendant's name is not known until warrants are executed, etc. Don't play the martyr, no one is buying it.
 

Back
Top Bottom