• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anomolies at ground zero

Garb said:
Well it is kind of common knowledge that a plane hit the towers and that this plane didn't dissapear out of thin air.

What if I didn't? Does this prove your claims ture then?
Click to expand...

So you haven't read it despite claiming that you have.
 
kookbreaker said:
When what the firemen said resembles what you claim, then you may have a point.

The fact is: The firemen who reported 'minor fires' (actually they said they needed two engines, hardly 'minor') were bot at the impact point. It was doubtful if any firemen got to that point.

So what the firemen said was accurate. What is not accurate is where you claim they were.

http://www.911myths.com/html/no_wtc2_inferno_.html
Click to expand...

They said two lines not two engines.
 
Docker said:
So you haven't read it despite claiming that you have.
Click to expand...

This is true. But moot. The point you evaded was that the they were only on the 78th floor. Not the impact point.

I take it that you concede that they were not where you claim they were?
 
Docker said:
Retraact your lie you mean. So I am supposed to listen to a man that lies about the sources he has read?
Click to expand...


are we supposed to listen to someone that has never provided evidence, and sources, or facts about the claims they make.

Seemingly, if we provide evidence of what we claim, we are now liars, but when you make a claim without evidence, you want us to believe you.
 
Docker said:
Retraact your lie you mean. So I am supposed to listen to a man that lies about the sources he has read?
Click to expand...

Yes, you are much more credible, a man who lies about everything he says and doesn't cite his sources...
 
Docker said:
They said two lines not two engines.
Click to expand...

The link provided says:
9:52 a.m.

Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven to Battalion Seven Alpha."

"Freddie, come on over. Freddie, come on over by us."

Battalion Seven Chief: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones."

Ladder 15: "What stair are you in, Orio?"

Battalion Seven Aide: "Seven Alpha to lobby command post."

Ladder Fifteen: "Fifteen to Battalion Seven."

Battalion Seven Chief: "... Ladder 15."

Ladder 15: "Chief, what stair you in?"

Battalion Seven Chief: "South stairway Adam, South Tower."

Ladder 15: "Floor 78?"

Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four, numerous civilians, we gonna need two engines up here."

Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're on our way."

http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/firefighter-tape-excerpts.htm
Click to expand...

In this context, Battalion Seven Chief appears to be using "engines" and "lines" interchangeably. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Docker said:
he has now admitted he hasn't read it.
Click to expand...

and you haven't either. so what makes you so special? your both liars...cool.


I've read about half of the report *(only the sections that i was interested in, and re-reading to read other sections when I feel the need to prove something). Not everyone has sat down and read the whole thing. You didn't even read one page. Garb could have read three pages;; that's more than you did.
 
Arus808 said:
and you haven't either. so what makes you so special? your both liars...cool.


I've read about half of the report *(only the sections that i was interested in, and re-reading to read other sections when I feel the need to prove something). Not everyone has sat down and read the whole thing. You didn't even read one page. Garb could have read three pages;; that's more than you did.
Click to expand...

Rofl
 
so, they would need two hoses. Assuming, of course, you are correct. (My brother has been FDNY for the last 15 years. I'll ask him about their jargon later)

Do you know how many men it takes to handle a hose?
 
Docker said:
A hose.
Click to expand...

false. please dont comment on things you dont have any clue as to what they mean.

btw, it has several meanings when used in firefighting. Its determined on the situation, the kind of fire they are fighting and the context its used in.
 
Garb said:
Yes, you are much more credible, a man who lies about everything he says and doesn't cite his sources...
Click to expand...

You have admitted you lied. Thus, you have admitted you argue with people without even looking at the evidence you cite.

Now could you name one lie that I have told?
 
he reached the 78th floor. He did not anaylize the 79th and up.

Of course the building collpased. So he didn't fully realize the full damage.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom